Using implementation and program theory to examine communication strategies in national wildlife federation's backyard wildlife habitat program

Applied Environmental Education and Communication

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 219-238

  Palmer, Dain ^a   Dann, Shari L ^b  

^a North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896694066     PISSN: 1533015X     EISSN: 15330389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15330150490886115     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bennett, D. (1978). Analyzing impacts of extension programs, No. ECS575, U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture, Extension Service. Washington, DC: USA.
2. Bruening, T. H. (1991). Communicating with farmers about environmental issues. Journal of Applied Communications, 75(1), 34-40.
3. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
4. Gamon, J., Bounaga, L., & Miller, W. W. (1992). Identifying informational sources and educational methods for soil conservation information used by landowners of highly erodible fields. Journal of Applied Communications, 76(1), 1-5.
5. Jeannette, K. J., & Meyer, M. H. (2002). Online learning equals traditional classroom training for Master Gardeners. HortTechnology, 12(1), 148-156.
6. Laughin, K. M., & Schmidt, J. L. (1995). Maximizing program delivery in extension: Lessons from leadership transformation. Journal of Extension, 33(4). Retrieved 6 February, 2003, from 〈http://www.joe.org/joe/1995august/a4.html〉.
7. Mizejeski, D. (2002). NationalWildlife Federation's wildlife habitat planning guide: For backyards and beyond. Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation.
8. NWFa. (n.d.). Backyard Wildlife Habitat program guidelines. Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation.
9. NWFb. (n.d.). Mihchigan Habitat Stewards training manual: Working to Create and Enhance Wildlife Habitat in Your Community. Ann Arbor, MI: National Wildlife Federation.
10. NWFc. (n.d.). Backyard Wildlife Habitat website. Retrieved December, 2002, from 〈http://www.nwf.org/backyardwildlifehabitat〉.
11. NWFd. (n.d.). Backyard Wildife Habitat brochure. Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation.
12. Pomerantz, G. A., & Blanchard, K. A. (1992). Successful communication and education strategies for wildlife conservation. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 57, 156-163.
13. Rodewald, A. D. (2001). Delivery systems-Is the "latest" technology the greatest? Journal of Extension, 39(4). Retrieved 18 February, 2003, from 〈http://www.joe.org/joe/2001august/tt2.html〉.
14. Rollins, T. J., Bruening, T. B., & Radhakrishna, R. B. (1991). Identifying extension information delivery methods for environmental issues. Journal of Applied Communications, 75(2), 1-9.
15. Roper Organization Inc. (1990). The environment: Public attitudes and individual behavior. New York.
16. Schoenfeld, C., & Griffin, R. J. (1981). Communication: A human factor. In R. T. Dumke, G. V. Burger, & J. R. Marsh (Eds.),Wildlife management on private lands, (pp. 130-152). Milwaukee, WI: Wildlife management on private lands, symposium May 3-6, 1981. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Chapter of the Wildlife Society.
17. SPSS, Inc. (2000). SPSS for Windows, Release 10.0.7, standard version [Computer software]. Chicago: SPSS.
18. Suvedi, M., Campo, S., & Lapinski, M. K. (1999). Trends in Michigan farmers' behaviors and perspectives on the delivery of information. Journal of Applied Communications, 83(3), 33-50.
19. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000. Retrieved 25 June, 2003 from 〈http://www.census.gov/〉.
20. Van Der Zanden, A. M., Rost, B., & Eckel, R. (2002). Basic botany on-line: A training tool for the Master Gardener program. Journal of Extension, 40(5). Retrieved 18 February, 2003, from 〈http://www.joe.org/joe/2002october/rb3.shtml〉.
21. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Winship, C., & L. Radbill. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23(2), 230-257.