jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-12

  de Leeuw, Joshua R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amazon Mechanical Turk; JavaScript; Online experiments

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DEVICES; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIBRARY SCIENCE; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS; WEB BROWSER;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIBRARY AUTOMATION; LIBRARY TECHNICAL SERVICES; RESEARCH DESIGN; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84896690776     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
2. Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS ONE, 8, e51382. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
3. Eriksen, B., & Eriksen, C. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
4. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 129–139. doi:10.3758/BF03210958
5. Goldstone, R., Rogosky, B., Pevtzow, R., & Blair, M. (2005). Perceptual and semantic reorganization during category learning. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 651–678). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
7. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., & Rist, F. (1994). Selective attention and response competition in schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Research, 53, 129–139.
8. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
9. McDonnell, J. V., Martin, J. B., Markant, D. B., Coenen, A., Rich, A. S., & Gureckis, T. M. (2012). psiTurk (Version 1.02) [Software]. New York, NY: New York University. Available from https://github.com/NYUCCL/psiTurk
10. Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441–474. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90016-0
11. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
12. Reips, U.-D., & Neuhaus, C. (2002). WEXTOR: A Web-based tool for generating and visualizing experimental designs and procedures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 234–240. doi:10.3758/BF03195449
13. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the turkers? Worker demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In CHI ’10: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2863–2872). New York: ACM.
14. Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: six replication attempts. PloS ONE, 7, e51382. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051382