Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 337-345

  De Souza Nunes, Leandro Soeiro ^a   Bornstein, Michael M ^a   Sendi, Pedram ^b   Buser, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NOSE MUCOSA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH IMPLANT; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BICUSPID; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; NASAL MUCOSA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; YOUNG ADULT;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

EID: 84896588273     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1475     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Buser D, Martin WD, Belser UC. Surgical considerations with regard to singletooth replacements in the esthetic zone: Standard procedure in sites without bone deficiencies. In: Buser D, Belser U, Wismeijer D (eds). ITI Treatment Guide, vol 1. Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone. Berlin: Quintessence, 2006: 26-37.
2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karning T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313-323.
3. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 809-818.
4. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hardtissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 820-828.
5. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212-218.
6. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 21-27.
7. Araújo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 606-614.
8. Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 19-29.
9. Flick S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Hürzeler M. Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: A volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 356-363.
10. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 13-21.
11. Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1168-1171.
12. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 48-56.
13. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 113-119.
14. Belser UC. Replacement of an upper left persisting deciduous canine with a regular neck implant, restored with a ceramometal crown, horizontally screw-retained. In: Buser D, Belser U, Wismeijer D (eds). ITI Treatment Guide, vol 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone. Berlin: Quintessence, 2006: 159-177.
15. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 856-863.
16. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (≤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 816-825.
17. Strietzel FP. Sinus floor elevation and augmentation. Evidence-based analysis of prognosis and risk factors [in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2004; 8: 93-105.
18. Bornstein MM, Chappuis V, von Arx T, Buser D. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1034-1043.
19. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary surgery. The osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994; 15: 152-160.
20. Summers RB. The osteotome techniqu. Part 4. Future site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16: 1090-1099.
21. Harorh A, Bocutoğlu O. The comparison of vertical height and width of maxillary sinus by means of Waters’ view radiograms taken from dentate and edentulous cases. Ann Dent 1995; 54: 47-49.
22. Ohba T, Langlais RP, Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Hashimoto K. Maxillary sinus floor in edentulous and dentate patients. Indian J Dent Res 2001; 12: 121-125.
23. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: A study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 163-168.
24. Ariji Y, Ariji E, Yoshiura K, Kanda S. Computed tomographic indices for maxillary sinus size in comparison with the sinus volume. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 19-24.
25. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: Clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(suppl): 218-236.
26. Pjetursson BE, Rast C, Brägger U, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients’ perception. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 667-676.
27. Katsuyama H, Jensen SS. Treatment options for sinus floor elevation. In: Chen S, Buser D, Wismeijer D (eds). ITI Treatment Guide, vol 5. Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures. Berlin: Quintessence, 2006: 33-57.
28. Saglam AA. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 143-147.
29. Güler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Biçer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 741-746.
30. Pramstraller M, Farina R, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L. Ridge dimensions of the edentulous posterior maxilla: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 127 patients using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 54-61.
31. Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinuslift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 462-465.
32. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 256-265.
33. Park YB, Jeon HS, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HS. Analysis of the anatomy of the maxillary sinus septum using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 1070-1078.
34. Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: Incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25: 261-265.
35. Velásquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: A 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 854-860.
36. Koymen R, Gocmen-Mas N, Karacayli U, Ortakoglu K, Ozen T, Yazici AC. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: Surgery and radiology. Clin Anat 2009; 22: 563-570.
37. Rak KM, Newell JD II, Yakes WF, Damiano MA, Luethke JM. Paranasal sinuses on MR images of the brain: Significance of mucosal thickening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156: 381-384.
38. Min Y, Lee J, Shin J. Radiologic assessment of diseased mucosa of the maxillary sinus after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 657-662.
39. Peleg M, Chaushu G, Mazor Z, Ardekian L, Bakoon M. Radiological findings of the post-sinus lift maxillary sinus: A computerized tomography follow-up. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 1564-1573.
40. Pruna X. Morpho-functional evaluation of osteomeatal complex in chronic sinusitis by coronal CT. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1461-1468.
41. Cagici CA, Yilmazer C, Hurcan C, Ozer C, Ozer F. Appropriate interslice gap for screening coronal paranasal sinus tomography for mucosal thickening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266: 519-525.
42. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: Results from the health 2000 health examination survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e80-e87.
43. Havas TE, Motbey JA, Gullane PJ. Prevalence of incidental abnormalities on computed tomographic scans of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 856-859.
44. Janner SF, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: A radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1446-1453.
45. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 80-89.
46. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. European association for osseointegration. EAO guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European association for osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 566-570.
47. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, et al. EAO guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European association for osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1243-1253.
48. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 27-40.
49. Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar traum. Part 1: Traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol 2007; 23: 95-104.