The collaborative autonomy model of medical decision-making

Neurocritical Care

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 311-318

  Rubin, Michael A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Beneficence; Critical care; Medical ethics; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; BIOETHICS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; VIGNETTE; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

BENEFICENCE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 84896549659     PISSN: 15416933     EISSN: 15560961     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-013-9922-2     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Sulmasy DP, Terry PB, Weisman CS, Miller DJ, Stallings RY, Vettese MA, Haller KB. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:621-9. (Pubitemid 28169638)
2. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systemic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-7.
3. Lanoix M. Where angels fear to tread: proxy consent and novel technologies. Brain Inj. 2010;24:1336-42.
4. White DB, Malvar G, Karr J, Lo B, Curtis JR. Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):743-50.
5. Prioreschi P. The Hippocratic oath: a code for physicians, not a pythagorean manifesto. Med Hypotheses. 1995;44(6):447-62.
6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. USA: Oxford University Press; 2001.
7. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma D. For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in medical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
8. Kenny SA. The oxford illustrated history of western philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
9. Youngner S, Jackson DL, Allen M. Staff attitudes towards the care of the critically ill in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1979;7(2):35.
10. Rothman DJ. Were Tuskegee & Willowbrook studies in 'nature'? Hastings Center Rep. 1982;12:5-7.
11. Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie R, Miller F, Wendler D. The oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
12. Truog RD, Kesselheim AS, Joffe S. Paying patients for their tissue: the legacy of Henrietta lacks. Science. 2012;337(6090):37-8.
13. Markman JR, Markman M. Running an ethical trial 60 years after the Nuremberg code. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(12):1139-46. (Pubitemid 350182970)
14. Stevens ML. The Quinlan case revisited: a history of the cultural politics of medicine and the law. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21(2):347-66 (discussion 367-72).
15. Brindisi TJ. Right to die-court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; health care decisions act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Univ Baltimore Law Rev. 1994;23(2):619-44.
16. Engelhardt HT. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
17. Veatch RM. Patient, heal thyself: how the new medicine puts the patient in charge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
18. Arnold RM, Kellum J. Moral justifications for surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:S347-53. (Pubitemid 36583822)
19. Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(4):214-8.
20. Davis MA, Hoffman JR, Hsu J. Impact of patient acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision-making. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(8):781-5. (Pubitemid 29372644)
21. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531-5. (Pubitemid 41003809)
22. Chung GS, Lawrence RE, Curlin FA, Arora V, Meltzer DO. Predictors of hospitalised patients' preferences for physician-directed medical decision-making. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(2):77-82.
23. Johnson SK, Bautista CA, Hong SY, Weissfeld L, White DB. An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(7):915-21.
24. Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(9):763-9. (Pubitemid 126450365)
25. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Read Health Care Ethics. 2000;1:40-9.
26. Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010;18(1):60-84.