Antimineralization treatment and patient-prosthesis mismatch are major determinants of the onset and incidence of structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic heart valves

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 147, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1219-1224

  Flameng, Willem ^a   Rega, Filip ^a   Vercalsteren, Monique ^a   Herijgers, Paul ^a   Meuris, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; OLEIC ACID; POLYSORBATE 80;

AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CALCIFICATION; CATTLE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REGURGITATION; HEART VALVE STENOSIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; PERICARDIUM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MINERALS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 84896546873     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. W. Flameng, M.C. Herregods, M. Vercalsteren, P. Herijgers, K. Bogaerts, and B. Meuris Prosthesis-patient mismatch predicts structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic heart valves Circulation 121 2010 2123 2129
2. A. Carpentier Hemodynamic factors affecting the fate of valvular bioprosthesis Circulation 121 2010 2083 2084
3. S.H. Rahimtoola The year in valvular heart disease J Am Coll Cardiol 58 2011 1197 1207
4. R. Rosenhek Almanac 2011: valvular heart disease: the national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology Heart 97 2011 2007 2017
5. M.H. Yacoub, and I. El-Hamamsy Valvular disease: the private life of tissue valves Nat Rev Cardiol 7 2010 424 426
6. W. Flameng, B. Meuris, J. Yperman, V.G. De, P. Herijgers, and E. Verbeken Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132 2006 89 98
7. P. Pibarot, and J.G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J Am Coll Cardiol 36 2000 1131 1141
8. J.R. Seguin, D. Grandmougin, T. Folliguet, H. Warembourg, F. Laborde, and P.A. Chaptal Long-term results with the Sorin Pericarbon valve in the aortic position: a multicenter study J Heart Valve Dis 7 1998 278 282
9. J. Chambers, W. Dolman, J. Jawetz, A. Ramos, J. Collaco, and J. Barros-Pena An echocardiographic description of the Sulzer Carbomedics Synergy ST (Labcor) porcine valve in the aortic position J Heart Valve Dis 9 2000 661 666
10. C.W. Akins, D.C. Miller, M.I. Turina, N.T. Kouchoukos, E.H. Blackstone, and G.L. Grunkemeier et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135 2008 732 738
11. G.R. Barnhart, M. Jones, T. Ishihara, A.M. Chavez, D.M. Rose, and V.J. Ferrans Failure of porcine aortic and bovine pericardial prosthetic valves: an experimental investigation in young sheep Circulation 66 1982 I150 I153
12. M. Jones, E.E. Eidbo, S.L. Hilbert, V.J. Ferrans, and R.E. Clark The effects of anticalcification treatments on bioprosthetic heart valves implanted in sheep ASAIO Trans 34 1988 1027 1030
13. F.J. Schoen, R.J. Levy, S.L. Hilbert, and R.W. Bianco Antimineralization treatments for bioprosthetic heart valves: assessment of efficacy and safety J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104 1992 1285 1288
14. K. Hammermeister, G.K. Sethi, W.G. Henderson, F.L. Grover, C. Oprian, and S.H. Rahimtoola Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial J Am Coll Cardiol 36 2000 1152 1158
15. N. al-Khaja, A. Belboul, M. Rashid, A. el-Gatit, D. Roberts, and S. Larsson et al. The influence of age on the durability of Carpentier-Edwards biological valves: thirteen years follow-up Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 5 1991 635 640
16. W.R. Jamieson, L.H. Burr, M.T. Janusz, A.I. Munro, R.I. Hayden, and R.T. Miyagishima et al. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology Ann Thorac Surg 67 1999 10 17
17. A.P. Kappetein, J.J. Takkenberg, J.P. Puvimanasinghe, W.R. Jamieson, M. Eijkemans, and A.J. Bogers Does the type of biological valve affect patient outcome? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 5 2006 398 402
18. Y.A. Goffin, and M.A. Bartik Porcine aortic versus bovine pericardial valves: a comparative study of unimplanted and from patient explanted bioprostheses Life Support Syst 5 1987 127 143
19. M. Valente, U. Bortolotti, E. Arbustini, E. Talenti, G. Thiene, and V. Gallucci Glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine bioprosthesis: factors affecting performance as determined by pathologic studies Chest 83 1983 607 611
20. S.H. Rahimtoola The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch Circulation 58 1978 20 24
21. D. Mohty, J.G. Dumesnil, N. Echahidi, P. Mathieu, F. Dagenais, and P. Voisine et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 39 47
22. W. Pan A multiple imputation approach to Cox regression with interval-censored data Biometrics 56 2000 199 203
23. W. Flameng, P. Herijgers, and K. Bogaerts Recurrence of mitral valve regurgitation after mitral valve repair in degenerative valve disease Circulation 107 2003 1609 1613