Effect of the endothelial shear stress patterns on neointimal proliferation following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: An optical coherence tomography study

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 315-324

  Bourantas, Christos V ^a   Papafaklis, Michail I ^b   Kotsia, Anna ^c   Farooq, Vasim ^a   Muramatsu, Takashi ^a   Gomez Lara, Josep ^a   Zhang, Yao Jun ^a   Iqbal, Javaid ^a   Kalatzis, Fanis G ^d   Naka, Katerina K ^c   Fotiadis, Dimitrios I ^d   Dorange, Cecile ^e   Wang, Jin ^e   Rapoza, Richard ^e   Garcia Garcia, Hector M ^a   Onuma, Yoshinobu ^a   Michalis, Lampros K ^c   Serruys, Patrick W ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^e ABBOTT VASCULAR   (United States)

Author keywords

bioresorbable scaffold; endothelial shear stress; neointimal formation; optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONIST; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; EVEROLIMUS; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; RENIN INHIBITOR;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTERIAL WALL THICKNESS; ARTICLE; BIORESORBABLE SCAFFOLD; BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR SCAFFOLD; BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG ELUTING STENT; ENDOTHELIAL SHEAR STRESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANTATION; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOINTIMA; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SURGICAL PATIENT; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; CORONARY STENOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; SURGERY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOINTIMA; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84896544067     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.034     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:43-9. (Pubitemid 28064720)
2. Farb A, Weber DK, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Virmani R. Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 2002;105:2974-80. (Pubitemid 34693829)
3. Shimada Y, Kataoka T, Courtney BK, et al. Influence of plaque calcium on neointimal hyperplasia following bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:866-9. (Pubitemid 43837069)
4. Koskinas KC, Chatzizisis YS, Antoniadis AP, Giannoglou GD. Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1337-49.
5. Prati F, Di Mario C, Moussa I, et al. In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the stent: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1999;99:1011-4. (Pubitemid 29104489)
6. Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Theodorakis PE, et al. The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus- and paclitaxeleluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010;3:1181-9.
7. Wentzel JJ, Krams R, Schuurbiers JC, et al. Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after Wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2001;103:1740-5. (Pubitemid 32291410)
8. Cheng C, Tempel D, Oostlander A, et al. Rapamycin modulates the eNOS vs. shear stress relationship. Cardiovasc Res 2008;78:123-9. (Pubitemid 351430952)
9. Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y. From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? Eur Heart J 2012;33:16-25b.
10. Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al. First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:620-32.
11. Brugaletta S, Radu MD, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? Atherosclerosis 2012;221:106-12.
12. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Ormiston JA, et al. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes. Circulation 2010;122:2301-12.
13. Gomez-Lara J, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, et al. A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010;3:1190-8.
14. Gomez-Lara J, Radu M, Brugaletta S, et al. Serial analysis of the malapposed and uncovered struts of the new generation of everolimuseluting bioresorbable scaffold with optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011;4:992-1001.
15. Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Theodorakis PE, Katsouras CS, Fotiadis DI, Michalis LK. Relationship of shear stress with in-stent restenosis: bare metal stenting and the effect of brachytherapy. Int J Cardiol 2009;134:25-32.
16. Duraiswamy N, Schoephoerster RT, Moore JE Jr. Comparison of nearwall hemodynamic parameters in stented artery models. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:061006.
17. Jimenez JM, Davies PF. Hemodynamically driven stent strut design. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37:1483-94.
18. Mejia J, Ruzzeh B, Mongrain R, Leask R, Bertrand OF. Evaluation of the effect of stent strut profile on shear stress distribution using statistical moments. Biomed Eng Online 2009;8:8.
19. LaDisa JF Jr., Olson LE, Guler I, et al. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:947-57. (Pubitemid 40283676)
20. Pant S, Bressloff NW, Forrester AI, Curzen N. The influence of strutconnectors in stented vessels: a comparison of pulsatile flow through five coronary stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:1893-907.
21. Suzuki N, Nanda H, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Assessment of potential relationship between wall shear stress and arterial wall response after bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:357-64.
22. Gijsen FJ, Oortman RM, Wentzel JJ, et al. Usefulness of shear stress pattern in predicting neointima distribution in sirolimus-eluting stents in coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1325-8. (Pubitemid 37431144)
23. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Radu MD, Diletti R, et al. Spatial distribution and temporal evolution of scattering centers by optical coherence tomography in the poly(L-lactide) backbone of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Circ J 2012;76:342-50.
24. Stone PH, Saito S, Takahashi S, et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION study. Circulation 2012;126:172-81.
25. Yazdani SK, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, Su SH, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. In vitro and in vivo characterisation of biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stent. EuroIntervention 2011;7:835-43.
26. Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Regar E, et al. A bioabsorbable everolimuseluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet 2008;371:899-907. (Pubitemid 351384734)
27. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Dudek D, et al. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1578-88.
28. Oberhauser JP, Hossainy S, Rapoza RJ. Design principles and performance of bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds. EuroIntervention 2009;5 Suppl F:F15-22.
29. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2379-93. (Pubitemid 46962266)
30. Vorpahl M, Finn AV, Nakano M, Virmani R. The bioabsorption process: tissue and cellular mechanisms and outcomes. EuroIntervention 2009;5 Suppl F:F28-35.
31. Bourantas CV, Papafaklis MI, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Short- and long-term implications of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation on the local endothelial shear stress patterns. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2014;7:100-1.
32. Brugaletta S, Gomez-Lara J, Diletti R, et al. Comparison of in vivo eccentricity and symmetry indices between metallic stents and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;79:219-28.