Interrelations Between Four Antepartum Obstetric Interventions and Cesarean Delivery in Women at Low Risk: A Systematic Review and Modeling of the Cascade of Interventions

Birth

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 70-78

  Rossignol, Michel ^a,b   Chaillet, Nils ^c   Boughrassa, Faiza ^a   Moutquin, Jean Marie ^b  

^a Institut national d excellence en santé et en services sociaux INESSS   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Electronic fetal monitoring; Epidemiology; Epidural analgesia; Instrumental delivery; Labor acceleration; Labor induction; Obstetrics

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIC AGENT;

CESAREAN SECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR INDUCTION; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; RISK; STATISTICS;

CESAREAN DELIVERY; ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR ACCELERATION; LABOR INDUCTION; OBSTETRICS;

ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CESAREAN SECTION; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; ODDS RATIO; OXYTOCICS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84896520277     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12088     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Blanchette H. The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: What are the consequences? Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:687-90.
2. Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, et al. Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:979-84.
3. Tillett J. Decision making by women during the process of labor. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2009;23:204-6.
4. Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Wang YA, et al. Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: A population-based study. Women Birth. 2007;20:41-8.
5. Rossignol M, Boughrassa F, Moutquin JM. Promising measures for reducing the recourse to preventable obstetrical interventions in low risk women (in French). Québec, Canada: Institut d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), 2012. Accessed November 26, 2012. Available at: http://inesss.qc.ca.
6. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.
7. University of Ottawa. Attributable Risk and Population Attributable Risk (PAR) Measures. Accessed August 2, 2012. Available at: http://www.med.uottawa.ca/sim/data/PAR_e.htm.
8. Blix E, Reiner LM, Klovning A, Oian P. Pronostic Value of the labour admission test and its effectiveness compared with auscultation only: A systematic review. BJOG 2005;112:1595-604.
9. Gourounti K, Sandall J. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of foetal heart rate: Effects on neonatal Apgar score, on the rate of caesarean sections and on the rate of instrumental delivery - a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2007;44:1029-35.
10. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic foetal monitoring (EFM) for foetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD006066.
11. Thacker SB, Stroup DF. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;2:CD000063.
12. Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, et al. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:149-55.
13. Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetière C, et al. Non-pharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared to usual care: A meta-analysis. Birth 2014 [in press].
14. Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD003246.
15. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, et al. Systematic review: Elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:252-63.
16. Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD004945.
17. Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:6-17.
18. Wei S, Wo BL, Xu H, et al. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2:CD006794.
19. Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD007123.
20. Public Health Agency of Canada. What Mothers Say: The CANDIAN Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, Canada: Public health agency of Canada, 2009.
21. Simpson KR, Atterbury J. Trends and issues in labor induction in the United States: Implications for clinical practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003;32:767-79.
22. Dugas M, Shorten A, Dubé E, et al. Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 2012;74:1968-78.
23. Say R, Robson S, Thomson R. Helping pregnant women make better decisions: A systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000261.
24. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: Approach to delivery after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:331-6.
25. Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: A meta-analysis. Birth 2007;34:53-64.
26. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;6:CD005528.
27. Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:791-7.