Acute intracranial hemorrhage in CT: Benefits of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction techniques

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 445-449

  Bodelle, Boris ^a   Klein, E ^a   Naguib, N N N ^a   Bauer, R W ^a   Kerl, J M ^a   Al Butmeh, F ^a   Wichmann, J L ^a   Ackermann, H ^a   Lehnert, T ^a   Vogl, T J ^a   Schulz, B ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ACUTE DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896482469     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3801     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:321-29 (Pubitemid 36909472)
2. Yates SJ, Pike LC, Goldstone KE. Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. Br J Radiol 2004;77:472-78 (Pubitemid 38807561)
3. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, et al. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1979-91 (Pubitemid 36949729)
4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84 (Pubitemid 350190758)
5. Wiest PW, Locken JA, Heintz PH, et al. CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002;23:402-10 (Pubitemid 36002016)
6. Schenzle JC, Sommer WH, Neumaier K, et al. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose? Invest Radiol 2010;45:347-53
7. Vandenberghe S, D'Asseler Y, Van de Walle R, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2001;25:105-11 (Pubitemid 32011237)
8. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;259:565-73
9. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:649-54
10. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764-71
11. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:126-31
12. Schulz B, Beeres M, Bodelle B, et al. Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1072-76
13. Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D, et al. Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:480-85
14. Bulla S, Blanke P, Hassepass F, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2246-50
15. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:636-43
16. Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, et al. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 2007;242:109-19 (Pubitemid 44956015)
17. Ren Q, Dewan SK, Li M, et al. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in brain CT. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2597-601
18. Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B, et al. Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:218-24
19. Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, et al. Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1578-82
20. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, et al. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191-99
21. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2012;22:138-43
22. Smith AB, Dillon WP, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1628-32 (Pubitemid 47598129)