Review of innovations in digital health technology to promote weight control

Current Diabetes Reports

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Thomas, J Graham ^a   Bond, Dale S ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet; Digital health; eHealth; mHealth; Obesity; Physical activity; Technology; Weight control

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSUMER; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIETARY INTAKE; DIGITAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; OBESITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REVIEW; SELF MONITORING; SENSOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TEXT MESSAGING; VIRTUAL REALITY; WEIGHT CONTROL; WEIGHT GAIN; WEIGHT REDUCTION; AMBULATORY MONITORING; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

BODY WEIGHT; CELL PHONES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; OBESITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WEIGHT LOSS; WEIGHT REDUCTION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84896433732     PISSN: 15344827     EISSN: 15390829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11892-014-0485-1     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Freeman C, Louçã F. As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
2. Parker JC, Thorson E. Health communication in the new media landscape. New York: Springer Publishing; 2009.
3. Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280:1371-4. (Pubitemid 28264817)
4. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081-93. (Pubitemid 47329572)
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults - United States, 2001 and 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1209-12.
6. Ford ES, Kohl HW, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:608-14.
7. Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:13-27.
8. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among us adults, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012;307:491-7.
9. Withrow D, Alter DA. The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity. Obes Rev. 2011;12:131-41.
10. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815-25.
11. Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K, et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:824-30.
12. Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34:841-59.
13. Tsai AG, Wadden TA, Volger S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention to treat obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37 Suppl 1:S31-7.
14. Lee JS, Sheer JL, Lopez N, Rosenbaum S. Coverage of obesity treatment: a state-by-state analysis of Medicaid and state insurance laws. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:596-604.
15. Topol EJ, Topol EJ. The creative destruction of medicine: how the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books; 2012.
16. Tufano JT, Karras BT. Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e58.
17. Duggan M, Smith A. Cell Internet Use 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; Sept 16, 2013. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2013/Cell-Internet.aspx, Accessed September 30, 2013.
18. File T. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Current Population Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 2013;20-568.
19. Smith A. Smartphone Ownership - 2013 Update. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; June 5, 2013. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2013/Smartphone-Ownership-2013.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
20. Zickuhr K. Tablet Ownership 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. June 10, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tablet- Ownership-2013.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
21. Global System for Mobile Communications Association. The Mobile Economy 2013. Global System for Mobile Communications Association, London, UK. 2013. Available at: http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/GSMA%20Mobile%20Economy%202013. pdf. Accessed September 30, 2013.
22. Kellogg D. Among Mobile Phone Users, Hispanics, Asians are Most-Likely Smartphone Owners in the U.S." Nielsen News, Online + Mobile. 2011. Available at: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/among-mobile-phone- users-hispanics-asians-are-most-likely-smartphone-owners-in-the-u-s/. Accessed September 30, 2013.
23. Calzada PJ, Anderson-Worts P. The obesity epidemic: are minority individuals equally affected? Prim Care. 2009;36:307-17.
24. Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 15, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx, Accessed September 30, 2013.
25. Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Mobile Health 2012. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2012. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2012/Mobile-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
26. Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 28, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
27. Fox S. Pew Internet: Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; July 1, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2011/November/Pew- Internet-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
28. Zickuhr K, Smith S. Digital Differences. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; April, 2012. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital- differences/Main-Report/Internet-adoption-over-time.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.
29. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172-7. (Pubitemid 32198482)
30. • Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:92-102. This review highlights the importance of self-monitoring for weight control, and contains a discussion of the role of selfmonitoring technology. The review also provides recommendations for the design of future studies to best enhance our understanding of why and how self-monitoring is effective for weight control.
31. Wing RR, Crane MM, Thomas JG, Kumar R, Weinberg B. Improving weight loss outcomes of community interventions by incorporating behavioral strategies. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2513-9.
32. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1620-5. (Pubitemid 44232371)
33. Arem H, Irwin M. A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e236-43.
34. Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11:306-21.
35. Winett RA, Tate DF, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG. Long-term weight gain prevention: a theoretically based Internet approach. Prev Med. 2005;41:629-41. (Pubitemid 40732380)
36. Svetkey LP, Stevens VJ, Brantley PJ, et al. Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1139-48. (Pubitemid 351398428)
37. Krukowski RA, Harvey-Berino J, Ashikaga T, Thomas CS, Micco N. Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:775-82.
38. Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity. 2010;18:308-13.
39. Webber KH, Tate DF, Ward DS, Bowling JM. Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42:161-7.
40. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:56-66.
41. Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, Forsyth LH, Roberts MB, Traficante RM. Efficacy of an individualized motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:174-80. (Pubitemid 29072332)
42. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailoredweight- lossmaterials.Health Psychol. 1999;18:487-94. (Pubitemid 29468521)
43. • Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, et al. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e1. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that widely available text messaging technology can be used to produce weight loss. It also highlights the advantages of treatment tailoring and interactivity.
44. Shapiro JR, Koro T, Doran N, et al. Text4Diet: a randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. Prev Med. 2012;55:412-7.
45. Burke LE, Styn MA, Sereika SM, et al. Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:20-6.
46. Burke LE, Conroy MB, Sereika SM, et al. The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity. 2011;19:338-44.
47. Burke LE, Styn MA, Glanz K, et al. SMART trial: a randomized clinical trial of self-monitoring in behavioral weight management-design and baseline findings. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:540-51.
48. Acharya SD, Elci OU, Sereika SM, Styn MA, Burke LE. Using a personal digital assistant for self-monitoring influences diet quality in comparison to a standard paper record among overweight/obese adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:583-8.
49. Spring B, Schneider K, McFadden HG, et al. Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:789-96.
50. Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-E-Call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1:e3.
51. •• Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, et al. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1041. This randomized controlled trial is one of the first to use smartphone technology as a primary means of delivering behavioral weight loss treatment. The design also incorporates innovative uses of the technology for competition and peer support.
52. Klinkner W. The New Lose It! Lose It! Blog, Boston, MA; October, 2012. Available at: http://blog.loseit.com/2012/10/10/the-new-lose-it/. Accessed September 30, 2013.
53. • Breton E, Fuemmeler B, Abroms L. Weight loss - there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:523-9. This study is important because it illustrates the lack of empirically validated weight loss strategies in commercial smartphone apps for weight loss, which have been downloaded millions of times. The findings of this paper suggest that partnerships between developers of commercial smartphone applications and academic researchers could be advantageous for producing the most sophisticated and effective weight loss applications.
54. Bacigalupo R, Cudd P, Littlewood C, Bissell P, Hawley MS, Buckley WH. Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14:279-91.
55. Omre AH. Bluetooth low energy: wireless connectivity for medical monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:457-63.
56. Gorini A, Gaggioli A, Vigna C, Riva G. A second life for eHealth: prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e21.
57. Sullivan DK, Goetz JR, Gibson CA, et al. Improving weight maintenance using virtual reality (Second Life). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45:264-8.
58. Yee N, Bailenson J. The Proteus Effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33:271-90.
59. Fox J, Bailenson JN. Virtual self-modeling: the effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol. 2009;12:1-25.
60. Entertain Software Association. 2013 sales, demographic and usage data: essential facts about the computer and video game industry Entertain Software Association, Washington, D.C.; 2013. Available at: http://www.theesa.com/facts/ pdfs/ESA-EF-2013.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2013.
61. Rizzo AS, Lange B, Suma EA, Bolas M. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: new tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:256-64.
62. Lee W, Chae YM, Kim S, Ho SH, Choi I. Evaluation of a mobile phone-based diet game for weight control. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:270-5.
63. Wing RR, Pinto AM, Crane MM, Kumar R, Weinberg BM, Gorin AA. A statewide intervention reduces BMI in adults: Shape Up Rhode Island results. Obesity. 2009;17:991-5.
64. Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity. 2007;15:3091-6. (Pubitemid 351256672)
65. Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:2968-79.
66. Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1231-9. (Pubitemid 40616646)
67. Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, et al. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009;15:540-59.
68. Mulvaney S, Ritterband L, Bosslet L.Mobile intervention design in diabetes: review and recommendations. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:486-93.
69. Tran J, Tran R, White JR. Smartphone-based glucose monitors and applications in the management of diabetes: an overview of 10 salient "apps" and a novel smartphone-connected blood glucose monitor. Clin Diabetes. 2012;30:173-8.
70. Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity. 2013;21:25-31.