Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Nemani, Venu M ^a   Aichmair, Alexander ^a   Taher, Fadi ^b   Lebl, Darren R ^a   Hughes, Alexander P ^a   Sama, Andrew A ^a   Cammisa, Frank P ^a   Girardi, Federico P ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b WILHELMINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

interbody fusion; LLIF; minimally invasive; revision; spinal stenosis; transpsoas; XLIF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULOPATHY; REOPERATION; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL STENOSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 84896400768     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000141     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sengupta DK, Fischgrund JS. Lumbar stenosis. In: Bono CM, Garfi n SR, eds. Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 132-41.
2. Phillips FM, Sun MH. Thoracolumbar decompression: anterior and posterior. In: Bono CM, Garfi n SR, eds. Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004; 246-51.
3. Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Huang RR, et al. Neurologic defi cit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 1192-9.
4. Berjano P, Lamartina C. Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 ( suppl 2 ): S242-53.
5. Kepler CK, Sharma AK, Huang RC, et al. Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 329-33.
6. Kotwal S, Kawaguchi S, Lebl D, et al. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up [published online ahead of print September 6, 2012]. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182706ce7.
7. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2257-70. (Pubitemid 46849156)
8. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1295-304.
9. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 794-810. (Pubitemid 351281641)
10. Hansraj KK, Cammisa FP, Jr, O'Leary PF, et al. Decompressive surgery for typical lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 384: 10-7. (Pubitemid 33599763)
11. Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K, et al. Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does incidental durotomy affect outcome ? Spine 2012; 37: 406-13.
12. Al-Mutair A, Bednar DA. Spinal epidural hematoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 494-502.
13. Lee CK. Lumbar spinal instability (olisthesis) after extensive posterior spinal decompression. Spine 1983; 8: 429-33. (Pubitemid 13016797)
14. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 2005; 30: 1351-8. (Pubitemid 41760292)
15. Tuschel A, Chavanne A, Eder C, et al. Implant survival analysis and failure modes of the X STOP interspinous distraction device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: 1826-31.
16. Epstein NE. X-Stop: foot drop. Spine J 2009; 9: e6-9.
17. Kuchta J, Sobottke R, Eysel P, et al. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 823-9.
18. Kepler CK, Huang RC, Sharma AK, et al. Factors infl uencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 2012; 4: 71-5.
19. Kepler CK, Rihn JA, Radcliff KE, et al. Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 2012; 4: 15-20.
20. Laws CJ, Coughlin DG, Lotz JC, et al. Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study. Spine 2012; 37: 819-25.
21. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, et al. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E8.
22. Caputo AM, Michael KW, Chapman TM, Jr, et al. Clinical outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Scientific World J 2012; 2012: 680643.
23. Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N, et al. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 92-6.
24. Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, et al. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine 2010; 35 ( suppl 26 ): S331-7.