Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Lee, Jae Chul ^a   Kim, Yongdai ^b   Soh, Jae Wan ^a   Shin, Byung Joon ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

adjacent segment disease; lumbar spinal fusion; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; posterolateral fusion; risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LAMINECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SPINE FUSION; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT PLANNING; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL DISEASES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896389112     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988; 13: 375-7.
2. Chen WJ, Lai PL, Niu CC, et al. Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: E519-24.
3. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 970-81. (Pubitemid 26127219)
4. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004; 29: 1938-44. (Pubitemid 39181056)
5. Brantigan JW, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, et al. Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fi ber cage implant versus allograft bone. An investigational study in the Spanish goat. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 1994; 19: 1436-44.
6. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fi ber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the fi rst 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) 1993; 18: 2106-7.
7. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, et al. Analysis of titanium mesh cages in adults with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2407-15.
8. Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, et al. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine 2006; 31: 1351-7; discussion 8.
9. Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, et al. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Surg Neurol 2005; 64: 303-8; discussion 8. (Pubitemid 41337889)
10. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1497-503. (Pubitemid 38886539)
11. Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J 2011; 11: 11-20.
12. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-28. (Pubitemid 29211592)
13. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53: 891-903.
14. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 526-31.
15. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion, A biomechanical study. Spine 1984; 9: 574-81. (Pubitemid 14010208)
16. Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of fi ve different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacentlevel intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 150-5. (Pubitemid 47325401)
17. Chiang MF, Zhong ZC, Chen CS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by fi nite element analysis. Spine 2006; 31: E682-9.
18. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9: 392-400. (Pubitemid 26423733)
19. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 314-9. (Pubitemid 32762776)
20. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2253-7. (Pubitemid 47415109)
21. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fi xation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 1995; 8: 464-73.
22. Etebar S, Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fi xation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 163-9. (Pubitemid 29155896)
23. Pellise F, Hernandez A, Vidal X, et al. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 2007; 32: 574-9. (Pubitemid 46398925)
24. Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 2152-8. (Pubitemid 350276100)
25. Aiki H, Ohwada O, Kobayashi H, et al. Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 490-5. (Pubitemid 41414157)
26. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 1637-43.
27. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 338-45.
28. Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Allam Y, et al. Reoperation rate after instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a report on 1680 cases. Spine 2004; 29: 2516-20. (Pubitemid 40353271)
29. Wiltse LL, Radecki SE, Biel HM, et al. Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 1999; 12: 27-33. (Pubitemid 30261607)
30. Solberg TK, Sorlie A, Sjaavik K, et al. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine ? Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 56-63.
31. Ha KY, Son JM, Im JH, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after surgical correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47: 346-51.
32. Min JH, Jang JS, Jung B, et al. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 305-9.