Multiple samples aCGH analysis for rare CNVs detection

Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Sykulski, Maciej ^a   Gambin, Tomasz ^b,d   Bartnik, Magdalena ^c   Derwińska, Katarzyna ^c   Wiśniowiecka Kowalnik, Barbara ^c   Stankiewicz, Paweł ^c,d   Gambin, Anna ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c INSTITUTE OF MOTHER AND CHILD   (Poland)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896351642     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20439113     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-3-12     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lupski JR. Genomic disorders ten years on. Genome Med 2009, 1(4):42. 10.1186/gm42, 2684663, 19439022.
2. O'Hagan RC, et al. Array comparative genome hybridization for tumor classification and gene discovery in mouse models of malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 2003, 63:5352-5356.
3. Miller DT, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010, 86(5):749-764. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006, 2869000, 20466091.
4. Hehir-Kwa JY, Wieskamp N, Webber C, Pfundt R, Brunner HG, Gilissen C, de Vries BBA, Ponting CP, Veltman JA. Accurate distinction of pathogenic from benign CNVs in mental retardation. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(4):e1000752. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000752], 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000752, 2858682, 20421931.
5. Boone PM, et al. Detection of clinically relevant exonic copy-number changes by array CGH. Hum Mutat 2010, 31(12):1326-1342. 10.1002/humu.21360, 3158569, 20848651.
6. Matsunami N, Hadley D, Hensel CH, Christensen GB, Kim C, Frackelton E, Thomas K, da Silva RP, Stevens J, Baird L, Otterud B, Ho K, Varvil T, Leppert T, Lambert CG, Leppert M, Hakonarson H. Identification of rare recurrent copy number variants in high-risk autism families and their prevalence in a large ASD population. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e52239. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052239], 10.1371/journal.pone.0052239, 3544904, 23341896.
7. Koolen DA, et al. Genomic microarrays in mental retardation: A practical workflow for diagnostic applications. Hum Mutat 2009, 30(3):283-292. 10.1002/humu.20883, 19085936.
8. Picard F, et al. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:27. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-27, 549559, 15705208.
9. Cahan P, et al. wuHMM: a robust algorithm to detect DNA copy number variation using long oligonucleotide microarray data. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(7):e41. 10.1093/nar/gkn110, 2367727, 18334530.
10. Ben-Yaacov E, Eldar YC. A fast and flexible method for the segmentation of aCGH data. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(16):i139-i145.
11. Eilers PHC, de Menezes RX. Quantile smoothing of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(7):1146-1153. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti148, 15572474.
12. Snijders AM, et al. Rare amplicons implicate frequent deregulation of cell fate specification pathways in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2005, 24:4232-4242. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208601, 15824737.
13. Diskin SJ, et al. STAC: A method for testing the significance of DNA copy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Res 2006, 16(9):1149-1158. 10.1101/gr.5076506, 1557772, 16899652.
14. et al. Mitchell Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays. PLoS Genet 2007, 3(8):e143. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030143, 1950957, 17722985, Mitchell.
15. Nowak G, et al. A fused lasso latent feature model for analyzing multi-sample aCGH data. Biostatistics 2011, 12(4):776-791. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr012, 3169672, 21642389.
16. Mefford HC, et al. A method for rapid, targeted CNV genotyping identifies rare variants associated with neurocognitive disease. Genome Res 2009, 9:1579-1585.
17. Cardoso J, et al. Genomic profiling by DNA amplification of laser capture microdissected tissues and array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(19):e146. 10.1093/nar/gnh142, 528818, 15514107.
18. Leprêtre F, et al. Waved aCGH: to smooth or not to smooth. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(7):e94. 10.1093/nar/gkp1215, 2853126, 20071741.
19. van de Wiel MA, et al. Smoothing waves in array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(9):1099-1104. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp132, 19276148.
20. Faucett WA. International standard cytogenomic array consortium. interview by Alyson Krokosky, Sharon F Terry. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010, 14(5):585. 10.1089/gtmb.2010.1513, 20958093.
21. Zhang Y, et al. Systematic analysis, comparison, and integration of disease based human genetic association data and mouse genetic phenotypic information. BMC Med Genom 2010, 3:1.
22. Zhang J, et al. Development of bioinformatics resources for display and analysis of copy number and other structural variants in the human genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006, 115:205-214. 10.1159/000095916, 17124402.
23. Zahurak M, Parmigiani G, Yu W, Scharpf RB, Berman D, Schaeffer E, Shabbeer S, Cope L. Pre-processing Agilent microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:142. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/142/abstract].[PMID: 17472750], 10.1186/1471-2105-8-142, 1876252, 17472750.
24. Agilent Technologies Agilent feature extraction software - user guide. [http://www.genomics.agilent.com/files/Manual/G4460-90025_FE_User.pdf], Agilent Technologies.
25. Olshen AB, et al. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004, 5:557-572. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh008, 15475419.
26. Gogoi P, et al. A survey of outlier detection methods in network anomaly identification. Comput J 2011, 54:570-588.
27. Nelsen RB. An Introduction to Copulas (Lecture Notes in Statistics) 1998, Springer.
28. Tewari A, Giering MJ, Raghunathan A. Parametric Characterization of Multimodal Distributions with Non-gaussian Modes. 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Volume 0 2011, 286-292. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
29. Rhead B, et al. The UCSC genome browser database: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 38(Database):D613-D619. 2808870, 19906737.
30. Derwińska K, Bartnik M, Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik B, Jagla M, Rudziński A, Pietrzyk JJ, Kawalec W, Ziólkowska L, Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak A, Gambin T, Sykulski M, Shaw CA, Gambin A, Mazurczak T, Obersztyn E, Bocian E, Stankiewicz P. Assessment of the role of copy-number variants in 150 patients with congenital heart defects. Med Wieku Rozwoj 2012, 16(3):175-182. [PMID:23378395].
31. Bartnik M, Szczepanik E, Derwińska K, Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik B, Gambin T, Sykulski M, Ziemkiewicz K, Kedzior M, Gos M, Hoffman-Zacharska D, Mazurczak T, Jeziorek A, Antczak-Marach D, Rudzka-Dybala M, Mazurkiewicz H, Goszczańska-Ciuchta A, Zalewska-Miszkurka Z, Terczyńska I, Sobierajewicz M, Shaw CA, Gambin A, Mierzewska H, Mazurczak T, Obersztyn E, Bocian E, Stankiewicz P. Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in 102 patients with epilepsy and additional neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2012, 159B(7):760-771. [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.b.32081/abstract], 10.1002/ajmg.b.32081, 22825934.
32. Buysse K, et al. Challenges for CNV interpretation in clinical molecular karyotyping: Lessons learned from a 1001 sample experience. Eur J Med Genet 2009, 52(6):398-403. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.09.002, 19765681.
33. Mefford HC, Eichler EE. Duplication hotspots, rare genomic disorders, and common disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009, 19(3):196-204. 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.003, 2746670, 19477115.