The effects of psychological treatment in primary care in Sweden - A practice-based study

Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 204-212

  Holmqvist, Rolf ^a   Ström, Thomas ^a   Foldemo, Anniqa ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Patient moderator variables; Practice based study; Psychological treatment; Supportive therapy; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLIANCE; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL OUTCOME IN ROUTINE EVALUATION OUTCOME MEASURE SCALE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; CRISIS INTERVENTION; DEPRESSION; DIRECTIVE THERAPY; DYNAMIC THERAPY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORIENTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE BASED STUDY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; PSYCHOTHERAPIST ATTITUDE; REFLECTIVE ABILITY; REFLECTIVE THERAPY; REMISSION; SOCIAL CARE; STUDY DESIGN; SUPPORTIVE THERAPY; SWEDEN; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDERS; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896336527     PISSN: 08039488     EISSN: 15024725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2013.797023     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J. Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clin Psychol Psychother 2003; 10: 319-27.
2. Shadish WR, Navarro AM, Matt GE, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 512-29.
3. Barkham M, Connell J, Stiles WB, Miles JNV, Margison F, Evans C, et al. Dose - effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74: 160-7.
4. Wampold BE, Budge SL, Laska KM, Del Re AC, Baardseth TP, Flü ckiger C, et al. Evidence-based treatments for depression and anxiety versus treatment-as-usual: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 31: 1304-12.
5. Stiles WB, Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J, Connell J. Effectiveness of cognitive - behavioural, person-centred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary-care routine practice: Replication in a larger sample. Psychol Med 2008; 38: 677-88.
6. Kraus DR, Castonguay L, Boswell JF, Nordberg SS, Hayes JA. Therapist effectiveness: Implications for accountability and patient Care. Psychother Res 2011; 21: 267-76.
7. Clark DM, Fairburn CG, Wessely S. Psychological treatment outcomes in routine NHS services: A commentary on Stiles et al. Psychol Med 2008; 38: 629-34.
8. Stiles WB, Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J, Connell J. Correspondence. Psychol Med 2007; 38: 905-10.
9. Minami T, Wampold BE, Serlin RC, Hamilton EG, Brown GS, Kircher JC. Benchmarking the effectiveness of psychotherapy treatment for adult depression in a managed care environment: A preliminary study. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008; 76: 116-24.
10. Lambert M. Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychother Res 2007; 17: 1-14.
11. Tanielian TL, Marcus SC, Suarez AP, Pincus HA. Trends in psychiatric practice. 1988-1998, II: Caseload and treatment characteristics. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 880.
12. Rockland LH. A review of supportive psychotherapy, 1986-1992. Hosp Community Psych 1993; 44: 1053-60.
13. Budge S, Baardseth TP, Wampold BE, Flckiger C. Researcher allegiance and supportive therapy: Pernicious effects on results of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Psychother Counsell 2010; 12: 23-39.
14. Lipsitz JD, Gur M, Vermes D, Petkova E, Cheng J, Miller N, et al. A randomized trial of interpersonal therapy versus supportive therapy for social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety 2008; 25: 542-53.
15. Cuijpers P, Driessen E, Hollon SD, van Oppen P, Barth J, Andersson G. The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 32: 280- 91.
16. Roth A, Fonagy P. What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research, 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
17. Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, Mellor-Clark J, McGrath, G, et al. Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180: 51-60.
18. Barkham M, Gilbert N, Connell J, Marshall C, Twigg E. Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186: 239-46.
19. Mellor-Clark J, Barkham M, Connell J, Evans C. Practice-based evidence and need for a standardised evaluation system: Informing the design of the CORE System. Eur J Psychother Counsell Health 1999; 3: 357-74.
20. Mellor-Clark J, Barkham M. Quality evaluation: Methods, measures and meaning. In: Feltham C and Horton I, editors. Handbook of counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 207-24.
21. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 12-19.
22. Elfström M, Evans C, Carlsson S. Validation of the Swedish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clin Psychol Psychother (in press).
23. Pinsker H. A primer of supportive therapy. Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press; 1997.
24. Winston A, Rosenthal R, Pinsker, H. Learning supportive therapy. An illustrated guide. Arlington, VA: APA; 2012.