Current perspectives in the use of molecular imaging to target surgical treatments for genitourinary cancers

European Urology

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 947-964

  Greco, Francesco ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^b   Gill, Inderbir S ^c   Kaouk, Jihad H ^d   Remzi, Mesut ^e   Thompson, R Houston ^f   Van Leeuwen, Fijs W B ^g   Van Der Poel, Henk G ^h   Fornara, Paolo ^a   Rassweiler, Jens ⁱ  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e Department of Urology Landesklinikum Korneuburg ^*  (Austria)

^f MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^g LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁱ SLK Kliniken Heilbronn   (Germany)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Genitourinary oncologic surgery; Image guided surgery; Molecular imaging; Surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

ADRENAL CANCER; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER SURGERY; CYSTOSCOPY; ECHOGRAPHY; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; KIDNEY CANCER; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NARROW BAND IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TESTIS CANCER; UROGENITAL TRACT CANCER;

AUGMENTED REALITY; GENITOURINARY ONCOLOGIC SURGERY; IMAGE-GUIDED SURGERY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; SURGICAL NAVIGATION;

ADRENAL GLAND NEOPLASMS; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; OPTICAL IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TESTICULAR NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84896335948     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.033     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. V. Ntziachristos Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology Nat Methods 7 2010 603 614
2. K. Bouchelouche, and P. Oehr Recent developments in urologic oncology: positron emission tomography molecular imaging Curr Opin Oncol 20 2008 321 326
3. K. Bouchelouche, and P. Oehr Positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography of urological malignancies: an update review J Urol 179 2008 34 45
4. T. Powles, I. Murray, C. Brock, T. Oliver, and N. Avril Molecular positron emission tomography and PET/CT imaging in urological malignancies Eur Urol 51 2007 1511 1521 discussion 1520-1
5. J. Rioja, M. Rodríguez-Fraile, and R. Lima-Favaretto et al. Role of positron emission tomography in urological oncology BJU Int 106 2010 1578 1593
6. M.S. Gee, M.G. Harisinghani, and S. Tabatabaei Molecular imaging in urologic surgery Urol Clin North Am 36 2009 125 132
7. D.W. Piston, B.R. Masters, and W.W. Webb Three-dimensionally resolved NAD(P)H cellular metabolic redox imaging of the in situ cornea with two-photon excitation laser scanning microscopy J Microsc 178 1995 20 27
8. T.H. Pham, F. Bevilacqua, T. Spott, J.S. Dam, B.J. Tromberg, and S. Andersson-Engels Quantifying the absorption and reduced scattering coefficients of tissue-like turbid media over a broad spectral range with noncontact Fourier transform hyperspectral imaging Appl Opt 39 2000 6487 6497
9. N.S. van den Berg, F.W. van Leeuwen, and H.G. van der Poel Fluorescence guidance in urologic surgery Curr Opin Urol 22 2012 109 120
10. S.M. Larson, and H. Schöder Advances in positron emission tomography applications for urologic cancers Curr Opin Urol 18 2008 65 70
11. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, and J. Tetzlaff et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 151 2009 W65 W94
12. J.S. Barkun, J.K. Aronson, and L.S. Feldman et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations Lancet 374 2009 1089 1096
13. M.L. Thakur, and B.C. Lentle SNM; Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Joint SNM/RSNA Molecular Imaging Summit Statement J Nucl Med 46 2005 11N 13N 42N
14. D.A. Mankoff A definition of molecular imaging J Nucl Med 48 2007 18N
15. J. Coleman, R. Nascimento, and S.B. Solomon Advances in imaging for urologic procedures Nat Clin Pract Urol 4 2007 498 504
16. R. Weissleder, and V. Ntziachristos Shedding light onto live molecular targets Nat Med 9 2003 123 128
17. A. Bogaards, H.J. Sterenborg, J. Trachtenberg, B.C. Wilson, and L. Lilge In vivo quantification of fluorescent molecular markers in real-time by ratio imaging for diagnostic screening and image-guided surgery Lasers Surg Med 39 2007 605 613
18. S. Keereweer, J.D. Kerrebijn, and P.B. van Driel et al. Optical image-guided surgery - where do we stand? Mol Imaging Biol 13 2011 199 207
19. M. Baumhauer, M. Feuerstein, and H.P. Meinzer et al. Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations J Endourol 22 2008 751 766
20. P. Crow, N. Stone, C.A. Kendall, R.A. Persad, and M.P. Wright Optical diagnostics in urology: current applications and future prospects BJU Int 92 2003 400 407
21. D. Zaak, A. Karl, and R. Knuchel et al. Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder using fluorescence endoscopy BJU Int 96 2005 217 222
22. O. Ukimura Image-guided surgery in minimally invasive urology Curr Opin Urol 20 2010 136 140
23. G. Li, M. Cuilleron, and M. Cottier et al. The use of MN/CA9 gene expression in identifying malignant solid renal tumors Eur Urol 49 2006 401 405
24. R.G. Nascimento, J. Coleman, and S.B. Solomon Current and future imaging for urologic interventions Curr Opin Urol 18 2008 116 121
25. D. Teber, S. Guven, and T. Simpfendörfer et al. Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results Eur Urol 56 2009 332 338
26. O.R. Brouwer, T. Buckle, and A. Bunschoten et al. Image navigation as a means to expand the boundaries of fluorescence-guided surgery Phys Med Biol 57 2012 3123 3136
27. R. Mårvik, T. Langø, and G.A. Tangen et al. Laparoscopic navigation pointer for 3D image guided surgery Surg Endosc 18 2004 1242 1248
28. M. Feuerstein, T. Mussack, S.M. Heining, and N. Navab Intraoperative laparoscope augmentation for port placement and resection planning in minimally invasive liver resection IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27 2008 355 369
29. D. Teber, M. Baumhauer, E.O. Guven, and J. Rassweiler Robotic and imaging in urological surgery Curr Opin Urol 19 2009 108 113
30. J. Rassweiler, M. Baumhauer, and U. Weickert et al. The role of imaging and navigation for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery J Endourol 23 2009 793 802
31. J. Marescaux, F. Rubino, M. Arenas, D. Mutter, and L. Soler Augmented reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy JAMA 292 2004 2214 2215
32. S. Nicolau, L. Soler, D. Mutter, and J. Marescaux Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology Surg Oncol 20 2011 189 201
33. H.G. van der Poel, T. Buckle, O.R. Brouwer, R.A. Valdés Olmos, and F.W.B. van Leeuwen Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer Eur Urol 60 2011 826 833
34. T. Buckle, O.R. Brouwer, R.A. Valdés Olmos, H.G. van der Poel, and F.W. van Leeuwen Relationship between intraprostatic tracer deposits and sentinel lymph node mapping in prostate cancer patients J Nucl Med 53 2012 1026 1033
35. T. Buckle, P.T. Chin, and F.W. van Leeuwen (Non-targeted) radioactive/fluorescent nanoparticles and their potential in combined pre- and intraoperative imaging during sentinel lymph node resection Nanotechnology 21 2010 482001
36. A.C. van Leeuwen, T. Buckle, and G. Bendle et al. Tracer-cocktail injections for combined pre- and intraoperative multimodal imaging of lymph nodes in a spontaneous mouse prostate tumor model J Biomed Opt 16 2011 016004
37. S. Jeschke, A. Beri, and M. Grüll et al. Laparoscopic radioisotope-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in staging of prostate cancer Eur Urol 53 2008 126 133
38. S. Jeschke, L. Lusuardi, A. Myatt, S. Hruby, C. Pirich, and G. Janetschek Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging Urology 80 2012 1080 1086
39. A. Häcker, S. Jeschke, and K. Leeb et al. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of [18F]fluorocholine positron emission tomography-computerized tomography and laparoscopic radioisotope guided sentinel lymph node dissection J Urol 176 2006 2014 2018
40. F. Wawroschek, H. Vogt, D. Weckermann, T. Wagner, M. Hamm, and R. Harzmann Radioisotope guided pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer J Urol 166 2001 1715 1719
41. O.R. Brouwer, T. Buckle, and L. Vermeeren et al. Comparing the hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-nanocolloid for sentinel node identification: a validation study using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT J Nucl Med 53 2012 1034 1040
42. S.H. Warncke, A. Mattei, F.G. Fuechsel, S. Z'Brun, T. Krause, and U.E. Studer Detection rate and operating time required for gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node resection after injection of technetium-99m nanocolloid into the prostate with and without preoperative imaging Eur Urol 52 2007 126 133
43. N.S. van den Berg, R.A. Valdés-Olmos, H.G. van der Poel, and F.W. van Leeuwen Sentinel lymph node biopsy for prostate cancer: a hybrid approach J Nucl Med 54 2013 493 496
44. A.D. Gupta, and M. Han Imaging guidance in minimally invasive prostatectomy Urol Oncol 29 2011 343 346
45. J.W. Moul, C.J. Kane, and S.B. Malkowicz The role of imaging studies and molecular markers for selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy Urol Clin North Am 28 2001 459 472
46. O. Ukimura, C. Magi-Galluzzi, and I.S. Gill Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins J Urol 175 2006 1304 1310
47. H.G. van der Poel, W. de Blok, A. Bex, W. Meinhardt, and S. Horenblas Perioperative transrectal ultrasonography-guided bladder neck dissection eases the learning of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy BJU Int 102 2008 849 852
48. T. Simpfendörfer, M. Baumhauer, and M. Müller Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Endourol 25 2011 1841 1845
49. D. Teber, T. Simpfendörfer, S. Guven, M. Baumhauer, A.S. Gözen, and J. Rassweiler In-vitro evaluation of a soft-tissue navigation system for laparoscopic prostatectomy J Endourol 24 2010 1487 1491
50. H.H. Davila, M. Mamcarz, I. Nadelhaft, R. Salup, J. Lockhart, and R.E. Carrion Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat BJU Int 101 2007 1048 1051
51. S. Natarajan, L.S. Marks, and D.J. Margolis et al. Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system Urol Oncol 29 2011 334 342
52. C. Adam, G. Salomon, and S. Walther et al. Photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid for the detection of positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy in patients with carcinoma of the prostate: a multicentre, prospective, phase 2 trial of a diagnostic procedure Eur Urol 55 2009 1281 1288
53. T. Yamaguchi, J. Lee, and H. Uemura et al. Prostate cancer: a comparative study of (11)C-choline PET and MR imaging combined with proton MR spectroscopy Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32 2005 742 748
54. J. Kotzerke, B.G. Volkmer, and G. Glatting et al. Intraindividual comparison of [11C]acetate and [11C]choline PET for detection of metastases of prostate cancer Nuklearmedizin 42 2003 25 30
55. M. Cimitan, R. Bortolus, and S. Morassut et al. [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33 2006 1387 1398
56. C. Springer, M.R. Hoda, N. Mohammed, H. Fajkovic, P. Fornara, and F. Greco Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumors: evaluation of the long-term oncologic and functional outcomes in 340 patients BJU Int 111 2013 281 288
57. O. Ukimura, and I.S. Gill Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience J Endourol 22 2008 803 810
58. S. Tobis, J.K. Knopf, and C.R. Silvers et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging after intravenous indocyanine green: initial clinical experience with open partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors Urology 79 2012 958 964
59. S. Tobis, J. Knopf, and C. Silvers et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging with robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience for renal cortical tumors J Urol 186 2011 47 52
60. L.M. Su, B.P. Vagvolgyi, R. Agarwal, C.E. Reiley, R.H. Taylor, and G.D. Hager Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration Urology 73 2009 896 900
61. M.R. Hoda, and G. Popken Surgical outcomes of fluorescence-guided laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX J Surg Res 154 2009 220 225
62. J.T. Wessels, A.C. Busse, and M. Rave-Fränk et al. Photosensitizing and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human renal carcinoma cells in vitro Photochem Photobiol 84 2008 228 235
63. S.L. Best, A. Thapa, and M.J. Holzer et al. Minimal arterial in-flow protects renal oxygenation and function during porcine partial nephrectomy: confirmation by hyperspectral imaging Urology 78 2011 961 966
64. E.O. Olweny, S. Faddegon, and S.L. Best et al. Renal oxygenation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; characterization using laparoscopic digital light processing (DLP®) hyperspectral imaging J Endourol 27 2013 265 269
65. S. Oguro, K. Tuncali, H. Elhawary, P.R. Morrison, N. Hata, and S.G. Silverman Image registration of pre-procedural MRI and intra-procedural CT images to aid CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6 2011 111 117
66. D.E. Kang, R.L. White Jr., J.H. Zuger, H.C. Sasser, and C.M. Teigland Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma J Urol 171 2004 1806 1809
67. C. Ohyama, Y. Chiba, T. Yamazaki, M. Endoh, S. Hoshi, and Y. Arai Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe guided laparoscopic biopsy of sentinel lymph node in patients with clinical stage I testicular tumor J Urol 168 2002 1390 1395
68. F.J. Penna, D.A. Freilich, C. Alvarenga, and H.T. Nguyen Improving lymph node yield in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection using fluorescent molecular imaging: a novel method of localizing lymph nodes in Guinea pig model Urology 78 2011 232.e15-8
69. U. Lassen, G. Daugaard, A. Eigtved, L. Hojgaard, K. Damgaard, and M. Rorth Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30 2003 396 402
70. O.R. Brouwer, R.A. Valdés-Olmos, L. Vermeeren, C.A. Hoefnagel, O.E. Nieweg, and S. Horenblas SPECT/CT and a portable gamma-camera for image-guided laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in testicular cancer J Nucl Med 52 2011 551 554
71. E.C.C. Cauberg, D.M. de Bruin, D.J. Faber, T.G. van Leeuwen, J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, and T.M. de Reijke A new generation of optical diagnostics for bladder cancer: technology, diagnostic accuracy, and future applications Eur Urol 56 2009 287 297
72. B.W. De Jong, T.C. Bakker Schut, K.P. Wolffenbuttel, J.M. Nijman, D.J. Kok, and G.J. Puppels Identification of bladder wall layers by Raman spectroscopy J Urol 168 2002 1771 1778
73. I. Kausch, M. Sommerauer, and F. Montorsi et al. Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of prospective studies Eur Urol 57 2010 595 606
74. D. Jocham, H. Stepp, and R. Waidelich Photodynamic diagnosis in urology: state-of-the-art Eur Urol 53 2008 1138 1150
75. G.G. Hermann, K. Mogensen, S. Carlsson, N. Marcussen, and S. Duun Fluorescence-guided transurethral resection of bladder tumours reduces bladder tumour recurrence due to less residual tumour tissue in Ta/T1 patients: a randomized two-centre study BJU Int 108 2011 297 303
76. H.B. Grossman, A. Stenzl, and Y. Fradet et al. Long-term decrease in bladder cancer recurrence with hexaminolevulinate enabled fluorescence cystoscopy J Urol 188 2012 58 62
77. H.W. Herr, and S.M. Donat A comparison of white-light cystoscopy and narrow-band imaging cystoscopy to detect bladder tumour recurrences BJU Int 102 2008 1111 1114
78. B. Geavlete, M. Jecu, R. Multescu, and P. Geavlete Narrow-band imaging cystoscopy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a prospective comparison to the standard approach Ther Adv Urol 4 2012 211 217
79. A. Naselli, C. Introini, and L. Timossi et al. A randomized prospective trial to assess the impact of transurethral resection in narrow band imaging modality on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence Eur Urol 61 2012 908 913
80. O. Drieskens, R. Oyen, H. Van Poppel, Y. Vankan, P. Flamen, and L. Mortelmans FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32 2005 1412 1417
81. F.E. Kuehhas, P. Weibl, G. Tosev, G. Schatzl, and G. Heinz-Peer Multidetector computed tomography virtual cystoscopy: an effective diagnostic tool in patients with hematuria Urology 79 2012 270 276
82. X. Qu, X. Huang, L. Wu, G. Huang, X. Ping, and W. Yan Comparison of virtual cystoscopy and ultrasonography for bladder cancer detection: a meta-analysis Eur J Radiol 80 2011 188 197
83. G. Salomon, J. Spethmann, and A. Beckmann et al. Accuracy of HistoScanning™ for the prediction of a negative surgical margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy BJU Int 111 2013 60 66
84. D.S. Finley, B.M. Ellingson, and S. Natarajan Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance tractography of the prostate: feasibility for mapping periprostatic fibers Urology 80 2012 219 223