Complications of indwelling retrievable versus permanent inferior vena cava filters

Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 166-173

  Desai, Tina R ^a   Morcos, Omar C ^a   Lind, Benjamin B ^a   Schindler, Nancy ^a   Caprini, Joseph A ^a   Hahn, David ^a   Warner, David ^a   Gupta, NavYash ^a  

^a NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; SYSTEMIC DISEASE; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; VENA CAVA FILTER; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 84896319241     PISSN: 2213333X     EISSN: 22133348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.10.050     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Moore P.S., Andrews J.S., Craven T.E., Davis R.P., Corriere M.A., Godshall C.J., et al. Trends in vena caval interruption. JVasc Surg 2010, 52:118-125.e3. discussion: 125-6.
2. Janjua M., Younas F., Moinuddin I., Badshah A., Basoor A., Yaekoub A.Y., et al. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters. JInvasive Cardiol 2010, 22:235-239.
3. Nazzal M., Chan E., Abbas J., Erikson G., Sediqe S., Gohara S. Complications related to inferior vena cava filters: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2010, 24:480-486.
4. Mohan C.R., Hoballah J.J., Sharp W.J., Kresowik T.F., Lu C.T., Corson J.D. Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. JVasc Surg 1995, 21:235-245. discussion: 245-6.
5. Olorunsola O.G., Kohi M.P., Fidelman N., Westphalen A.C., Kolli P.K., Taylor A.G., et al. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Gunther Tulip filters. JVasc Interv Radiol 2013, 24:566-571.
6. Greenfield L.J., McCurdy J.R., Brown P.P., Elkins R.C. Anew intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 1973, 73:599-606.
7. Stein P.D., Kayali F., Olson R.E. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Int Med 2004, 164:1541-1545.
8. Angel L.F., Tapson V., Galgon R.E., Restrepo M.I., Kaufman J. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. JVasc Interv Radiol 2011, 22:1522-1530.e3.
9. Imberti D., Bianchi M., Farina A., Siragusa S., Silingardi M., Ageno W. Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. JThromb Haemost 2005, 3:1370-1375.
10. Ray C.E., Mitchell E., Zipser S., Kao E.Y., Brown C.F., Moneta G.L. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. JVasc Interv Radiol 2006, 17:1595-1604.
11. Van Ha T.G., Chien A.S., Funaki B.S., Lorenz J., Piano G., Shen M., et al. Use of retrievable compared to permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single-institution experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008, 31:308-315.
12. Kaufman J.A., Kinney T.B., Streiff M.B., Sing R.F., Proctor M.C., Becker D., et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. JVasc Interv Radiol 2006, 17:449-459.
13. Gaspard S.F., Gaspard D.J. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are rarely removed. Am Surg 2009, 75:426-428.
14. Kim H.S., Young M.J., Narayan A.K., Hong K., Liddell R.P., Streiff M.B. Acomparison of clinical outcomes with retrievable and permanent inferior vena cava filters. JVasc Interv Radiol 2008, 19:393-399.
15. Sarosiek S., Crowther M., Sloan J.M. Indications, complications, and management of inferior vena cava filters: the experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center. JAMA Intern Med 2013, 173:513-517.
16. Zhou D., Spain J., Moon E., McLennan G., Sands M.J., Wang W. Retrospective review of 120 celect inferior vena cava filter retrievals: experience at a single institution. JVasc Interv Radiol 2012, 23:1557-1563.
17. Doody O., Given M.F., Kavnoudias H., Street M., Thomson K.R., Lyon S.M. Initial experience in 115 patients with the retrievable Cook Celect vena cava filter. JMed Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009, 53:64-68.
18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Initial Communication. Available at: Accessed August 9,2010. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm221676.htm.
19. Durack J.C., Westphalen A.C., Kekulawela S., Bhanu S.B., Avrin D.E., Gordon R.L., et al. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Gunther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012, 35:299-308.
20. Ota S., Yamada N., Tsuji A., Ishikura K., Nakamura M., Isaka N., et al. The Gunther-Tulip retrievable IVC filter: clinical experience in 118 consecutive patients. Circ J 2008, 72:287-292.