Air pollution and forest water use

Nature

Volumn 507, Issue 7491, 2014, Pages

  Holmes, Christopher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; WATER USE;

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; BIOMASS; BIOSPHERE; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FOREST WATER USE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TREE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOSYSTEM; TREES; WATER;

EID: 84896273022     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13113     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Keenan, T. F. et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499, 324-327 (2013).
2. Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J. & Huntingford, C. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 448, 791-794 (2007).
3. Chappelka, A. H. & Samuelson, L. J. Ambient ozone effects on forest trees of the eastern United States. New Phytol. 139, 91-108 (1998).
4. Skärby, L., Ro-poulsen, H., Wellburn, F. A. M. & Sheppard, L. J. Impacts of ozone on forests: a European perspective. New Phytol. 139, 109-122 (1998).
5. Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J. & Emberson, L. D. The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 637-661 (2012).
6. Wittig, V. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Naidu, S. L., Karnowky, D. F. & Long, S. P. Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 396-424 (2009).
7. McLaughlin, S. B., Nosal, M., Wullschleger, S. D. & Sun, G. Interactive effects of ozone and climate on tree growth and water use in a southern Appalachian forest in the USA. New Phytol. 174, 109-124 (2007).
8. Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G. & Sparks, J. P. Predicting photosynthesis and transpiration responses to ozone: decoupling modeled photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. Biogeosciences 9, 3113-3130 (2012).
9. Cooper, O. R., Gao, R.-S., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T. & Sweeney, C. Long-term ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United States, 1990-2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D22307 (2012).
10. Tørseth, K. et al. Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972-2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 5447-5481 (2012).
11. WHO. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe 2nd edn, 219-251, http:// www.euro.who.int/-data/assets/pdf-file/0005/74732/E71922.pdf (World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2000).
12. Karlsson, P. E. et al. New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone. Atmos. Environ. 38, 2283-2294 (2004).
13. Calatayud, V., Cerveró , J.&Sanz, M. J. Foliar, physiologicalandgrowth responses of four maple species exposed to ozone. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 185, 239-254 (2007).
14. Franks, P. J. et al. Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: fromthe geological past to the next century. New Phytol. 197, 1077-1094 (2013).
15. Hoshika, Y.,Omasa, K.&Paoletti, E.Whole-treewater use efficiency is decreased by ambient ozone and not affected by O3-induced stomatal sluggishness. PLoS ONE 7, e39270 (2012).