Measuring the value of time-lapse (4D) seismic as part of history matching in the Schiehallion UKCS field

ECMOR 2006 - 10th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Stephen, K D ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SEISMOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN FRAMEWORKS; MODEL PROBABILITIES; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; NEIGHBOURHOOD ALGORITHMS; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; POSTERIOR PROBABILITY; RESERVOIR DESCRIPTION; RESERVOIR PROPERTY;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 84896258425     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Backus, G. E. 1962. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. J. Geophysical Research, 67 (11), p4427-4440.
2. Chapin, M., Terwogt, D., and Ketting, J. 2000. From Seismic to Simulation Using New Voxel Body and Geologic Modelling Techniques, Schiehallion Field, West of Shetlands. The Leading Edge, April 2000, p408-412.
3. Floricich, M., Macbeth, C, Stammeijer, J., Staples, R., Evans, A. and Dijskman, N. 2006. Determination of a seismic and engineering consistent petro-elastic model for time-lapse seismic studies: Application to the Schiehallion Field. Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 76th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 1-6 October, 2006.
4. Gassmann, F., 1951, Uber die elastizitat poroser medien: Vier. Der Natur. Gesellschaft, 96, 1-23.
5. Leach, H. M., Herbert, N., Los, A. and Smith, R. L. 1999. The Schiehallion development. In Fleet, A. J. and Boldy, S. A. R. (eds) Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe, Proceedings of the 5th Conference, p683-692. Geol. Soc., London, UK.
6. MacBeth, C. 2004. A Classification for the Pressure-Sensitivity Properties of a Sandstone Rockframe. Geophysics, 69(2) p497-510.
7. De Marseily, G., Levendan, G., Boucher, M. and Fasanino, G., "Interpretation of Interference Tests in a Well Field Using Geostatistical Techniques to Fit the Permeability Distributions in a Reservoir Model". In Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Marechal, A. (eds), Geostatistics for Natural Resource Characterisation, pp831-849, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, September 6-17, 1984.
8. Parker J., Bertelli L., and Dromgoole P. (2003) 4D Seismic Technology Special Issue. Petroleum Geoscience, 9(1), p1-111.
9. Sambridge, M S., 1999a. Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys.J.Int., 138, 479-494.
10. Sambridge, M S., 1999b. Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophys.J.Int., 138, 727-746.
11. Stephen, K. D., Soldo, J., MacBeth, C. and Christie M. 2005. Multiple Model Seismic And Production History Matching: A Case Study. SPE94173. Proceedings of the 14th Europec Biennial Conference held in Madrid, Spain, 13-16 June 2005.
12. Stephen, K. D. and MacBeth, C. 2006a. Seismic History Matching in the Schiehallion UKCS Field. First Break, 24, April, 2006, p43-49.
13. Stephen, K. D. and MacBeth, C. 2006b. Reducing Reservoir Prediction Uncertainty Using Seismic History Matching. SPE100295. Proceedings of the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition held in Vienna, Austria, 12-15 June 2006.
14. Stephen, K. D. and MacBeth, C. 2006c Inverting for the petro-elastic model via seismic history matching. Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 76th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 1-6 October, 2006.
15. Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse Problem Theory, Elsevier, Amsterdam