Regionalism in Global Trade

Regionalism in Global Trade

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-221

  Das, Dilip K ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896248075     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845421458     Document Type: Book

References (242)

1. ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2000), Asian Development Outlook 2000: Update, Manila, September.
2. Aitken, N.D. (1973), ‘The effects of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: a temporal cross-section analysis’, American Economic Review, 63 (4), 881–892.
3. Akamatsu, K. (1961), ‘A theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 86 (1), 42–76.
4. Anderson, J.E. (1979), ‘A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation’, American Economic Review, 69, 106–116.
5. Anderson, K. (1993), ‘European integration in the 1990s: implications for world trade and for Australia’, in D.G. Mayes (ed.), External Implications of European Integration, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.120–148.
6. Anderson, K. (2001), ‘Globalization, WTO and ASEAN’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 18 (1), 12–23.
7. APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation), Eminent Persons Group (1994), ‘Achieving the APEC vision’, second report, Singapore: APEC Secretariat, August.
8. APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation) (1995a), Implementation of the Bogor Declaration, report, Osaka, November.
9. APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation) (1995b), Joint Statement, Osaka, November. Available on the Internet at http://www.apecsec.org.sg/virtualib/minismtg.mtgmin95.html
10. APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation) (1997), Joint Statement, Vancouver. November. Available on the Internet at http://www.apecsec.org.sg/virtualib/minismtg.mtgmin97.html
11. Areddy, J.T. (2000), ‘A new agenda for APEC meeting’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 6 September, p.4.
12. Arndt, S. (1969), ‘Customs union and theory of tariffs’, American Economic Review, 59 (1), 108–118.
13. AWSJ (Asian Wall Street Journal) (2000), ‘Free trade in trouble: Kuala Lumpur wrecks a consensus within ASEAN’, Hong Kong, October 12, p.12.
14. Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (1993a), ‘Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of free trade areas’, NBER Working Paper No. 4363, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
15. Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (1993b), ‘Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of customs unions’, NBER Working Paper No. 4543, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
16. Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (1999), ‘An economic theory of the GATT’, American Economic Review, 89 (1), 215–248.
17. Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (2000), ‘GATT think’, NBER Working Paper No. 8005, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
18. Baun, M.J. (1996), An Imperfect Union: The Maastricht Treaty and the New Politics of European Union, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1995), ‘Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA’, NBER Working Paper No. 5283, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
20. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen (1997), ‘Optimum currency areas and exchange rate variability: theory and evidence’, in B. Cohen (ed.), Research Frontiers in International Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.143–184.
21. Bayoumi, T., B. Eichengreen and P. Mauro (2000), ‘On regional monetary arrangements for ASEAN’, paper presented at the ADB/CEPII/KIEP Conference on Exchange Rate Arrangements in Asia, in Tokyo, 17–18 December 1999. The paper was revised in May 2000.
22. Beasley, W.G. (1987), Japanese Imperialism, 1894–1945, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Ben-David, D. (1993), ‘Equalizing exchange: trade liberalization and income convergence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), 859–887.
24. Bergstrand, J.H. (1985), ‘The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474–481.
25. Bernard, M. and J. Ravenhill (1995), ‘Beyond production cycles and flying geese: regionalization, hierarchy, and industrialization of East Asia’, World Politics, 47, January, 171–209.
26. Bhagwati, J.N. (1997), ‘The golden age: from skeptical south to fearful north’, World Economy, 20 (3), 259–284.
27. Bhagwati, J. N. and A. Panagaria (1996), The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements, Washington, DC: AEI Press.
28. Bhatia, M. (2000), ‘Free trade two-step’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 14 November, p.7.
29. Borrus, M., D. Ernst and S. Haggard (eds) (2000), International Production Networks in Asia, London and New York: Routledge.
30. Braga, C., A. Primo, R. Safadi and A. Yeats (1994), ‘NAFTA’s implications for East Asian exports’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1351, October, World Bank, Washington, DC.
31. Breuss, F. (2001), ‘Macroeconomic effects of EU enlargement for old and new members’, WIFO Working Paper No. 143/2001, Vienna: WIFP.
32. Brown, D., A.V. Deardroff, S. Djankov and R. Stern (1997), ‘An economic assessment of Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland into European Union’, in S.W. Black (ed.), Europe’s Economy Looks East: Implications for European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.160–192.
33. BIE (Bureau of Industry and Economics) (1995), Impact of the CER Trade Agreement: Lessons for Regional Economic Co-operation, report, Canberra, Australian Government Printing Services.
34. Campa, J.M. and T.L. Sorenson (1996), ‘Are trade blocs conducive to free trade?’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 40 (2), 411–437.
35. Castells, M. (1999), A Sociedada em Rede, São Paulo: Paz e Terera.
36. Cecchini, P. (1998), 1992, The European Challenge: The Benefits of a Single Market, report, Aldershot: Wildwood House.
37. Cernat, L. (2001), ‘Assessing regional trade agreements: are South-South RTAs more trade diverting?’, Study Series No. 16, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
38. Chang, W. and L.A. Winters (2000), ‘How regional blocs affect excluded countries: the price effects of MERCOSUR’, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.
39. Chen, T. and Y.H. Ku (2000), ‘Globalization of Taiwan’s small firms: the role of Southeast Asia and China’, paper presented in a symposium on Experiences and Challenges of Economic Development in Southeast and East Asia, Taipei, October.
40. CID (Center for International Development) (2003), ‘Regionalism’, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, available on the Internet at http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidtrade/issues/regionalism.html, accessed January 31.
41. Coe, D.T. and E. Helpman (1995), ‘International R&D spillovers’, European Economic Review, 107 (2), 134–149.
42. Coe. D.T., E. Helpman and A. Hoffmaister (1997), ‘North–South R&D spillovers’, Economic Review, 39 (6), 859–887.
43. Commonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Joint Task Force Report (2002), Small States: Meeting Challenges in the Global Economy, London and Washington DC, April.
44. Conti, S. and P. Graciara (2000), Local Development and Competitiveness, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. Cox, D. and R. Harris (1992), ‘North American free trade and its implications for Canada: results from a CGE model of North American trade’, World Economy, 15 (1), 31–44.
46. CSFB (Credit Swiss First Boston) (2000), Emerging Market Quarterly: Asia Q1:2001, Hong Kong, 15 December.
47. Das, Dilip K. (1990), International Trade Policy, London: Macmillan.
48. Das, Dilip K. (1993), The Yen Appreciation and the International Economy, London: Macmillan.
49. Das, Dilip K. (1996), The Asia-Pacific Economy, London: Macmillan.
50. Das, Dilip K. (1998a), ‘Trade in financial services and the role of the GATS’, Journal of World Trade, 2 (6), 79–114.
51. Das, Dilip K. (1998b), ‘Changing comparative advantage and changing composition of Asian exports’, World Economy, 21 (1), January, 121–140.
52. Das, Dilip K. (2000a), ‘Asian exports: the present predicament’, in Dilip K. Das (ed.), Asian Exports, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–24.
53. Das, Dilip K. (2000b), ‘An action agenda for the next WTO round: a post-Seattle perspective’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 3 (5), September, 7370–773.
54. Das, Dilip K. (2000c), ‘Debacle at Seattle: the way the cookie crumbled’, Journal of World Trade, 12 (3), 66–97.
55. Das, Dilip K. (2001), Global Trading System at Crossroads: A Post-Seattle Perspective, London and New York: Routledge.
56. Das, Dilip K. (2002), ‘Global trading system: from Seattle to Doha’, International Journal, 57 (4), Autumn, 605–623.
57. Das, Dilip K. (2003a), Financial Globalization and the Emerging Market Economies, London and New York: Routledge.
58. Das, Dilip K. (2003b), Economic Dimensions of Globalization, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
59. Dean, J. (1995), ‘The trade policy revolution in developing countries’, in The World Economy: Global Trade Policy, Geneva: World Trade Organization, pp.173–190.
60. Dean, J., S. Desai and J. Riedel (1994), ‘Trade policy reform in developing countries since 1985’, Discussion Paper No. 267, World Bank, Washington DC.
61. Deardroff, A.V. (1997), ‘Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a classical world?’, in J.A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.131–164.
62. Deardroff, A.V. and R.M. Stern (1994), ‘Multilateral trade negotiations and preferential trading arrangements’, in A.V. Deardroff and R.M. Stern (eds), Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp.27–94.
63. de Jonquieres, G. (2000), ‘Asian ambition’, The Financial Times, 28 November.
64. de Serres, A., P. Hoeller and C. de la Maisonneuve (2002), ‘The width of the intra-European economic border’, Economics Department Paper No. 304, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
65. De Melo, J. and A. Panagaria (1992), ‘The new regionalism in trade policy’, London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
66. Devlin, R. and A. Estevadeordal (2001), ‘What is new in the new regionalism in the Americas?’, INTAL-ITD-STA Working Paper No. 6, May, Buenos Aires.
67. Diao, X., T. Roe and A. Somwaru (1999), ‘What is the cause of growth in regional trade: trade liberalization or RTAs’, Working Paper No. 99–01, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
68. Drucker, P. (1987), Frontier of Management, New York: Harper and Row.
69. EAVG (East Asia Vision Group) (1999), East Asia Economic Co-operation System, Singapore: ASEAN Secretariat.
70. ECLAC (The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (1994), Globalization and Development, Santiago, Chile.
71. ECLAC (The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2002), Globalization and Development, LC/G.2157. SES.29.3, Santiago, Chile.
72. The Economist (2000a), ‘Asian economies: happy neighbors’, 26 August, p.71.
73. The Economist (2000b), ‘Towards a tripartite world’, 15 July, pp.20–22.
74. The Economist (2003a), ‘Will there ever be a breakthrough?’, available on the Internet at http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id= 1666372, accessed 28 March.
75. The Economist (2003b), ‘On a roll’, available on the Internet at http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1872018, accessed 27 June.
76. EIU (Economic Intelligence Unit) (2003), Leaping Dragon, Trailing Tigers? Taiwan, Hong Kong and the Challenge of Mainland China, London: EIU.
77. EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) (2003), Europe Enlarged: Understanding the Impact, London: EIU.
78. Estevadeordal, A. (2002), ‘Traditional market access issues in RIAs: an unfinished agenda in the Americas?’, paper presented at the conference on The Changing Architecture of the Global Trading System, organized by the World Trade Organization, Geneva, 26 April.
79. Estevadeordal, A., J. Harris and M. Shearer (2002a), ‘Towards trade in the Americas’, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
80. Estevadeordal, A., J. Goto and R. Saez (2002b), ‘The new regionalism in the Americas: the case of MERCOSUR’, INTAL-ITD-STA Working Paper No. 5, April, Buenos Aires.
81. Ethier, W.J. (1997), Modern International Economics, New York: W.W. Norton.
82. Ethier, W.J. (1998a), ‘Regionalism in a multilateral world’, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6), December, pp.1214–1245.
83. Ethier, W.J. (1998b), ‘The new regionalism’, Economic Journal, 108 (3), July, 677–694.
84. Ethier, W.J. (1999), ‘Regionalism in a multilateral world’, in J. Pigott and A. Woodland (eds), International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp.130–163.
85. Evans, D. (1998), ‘Options for regional integration in Southern Africa’, IDS Working Paper No. 94, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
86. Fernandez, R. (1998), ‘Returns to regionalism: an evaluation of nontraditional gains from regional trade agreements’, World Bank Economic Review, 14 (2), 32–58.
87. Flamm, K. and E. Lincoln (1998), ‘Reinvigorating APEC: how the Pacific trade and investment organization can be salvaged’, International Economy, January–February, 18–24.
88. Foroutan, F. (1998), ‘Does membership in a regional preferential trade arrangement make a country more or less protectionist?’, World Economy, 21 (3), May, 305–335.
89. Frankel, J.A. (1991), ‘Is a yen bloc forming in Pacific Asia’, in R. O’Brien (ed.), Finance and International Economy, Volume 5, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.88–102.
90. Frankel, J.A. (1997), Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
91. Frankel, J.A. and S.J. Wei (1996), ‘ASEAN in a regional perspective’, mimeo, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
92. Frankel, J.A. and S.J. Wei (1997), ‘The new regionalism and Asia: impact and options’, in N.P. Rao and A. Panagariya (eds), The Global Trading System and Developing Asia, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, pp.83–135.
93. Frankel, J., E. Stein and S.J. Wei (1994), ‘Trading blocs and the Americas: the natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural’, Working Paper No. C 94-034, University of California, Berkeley.
94. Frankel, J., E. Stein and S.J. Wei (1996), ‘Regional trading agreements: natural or supernatural’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 86, 52–56.
95. Freund, C. (2003), ‘Reciprocity in free trade agreement’, Working Paper No. 3061, World Bank, Washington, DC.
96. FT (Financial Times) (2000), ‘New balance in Asia’, 11 October, p.18.
97. Fujita, N., P. Krugman and A.J. Venables (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
98. Fukasaku, K. and F. Kimura (2002), ‘Globalization and intra-firm trade: further evidence’, in P.J. Lloyd and H.H. Lee (eds), Frontiers of Research in Intra-Industry Trade, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.130–162.
99. Funabashi, Y. (1995), Asia-Pacific Fusion: Japan’s Role in APEC, Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
100. GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) (1994), The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: the Legal Text, Geneva: GATT.
101. Gilbert, J., R. Scollay and B. Bora (2001), Assessing Regional Trading Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific, Policy Series No. 15, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
102. Greenaway, D. and W.O. Morrissey (1993), ‘Structural adjustment and liberalization in developing countries: what lessons have we learned?’, Kyklos, 24 (2), 241–262.
103. Grether, J.M. and M. Olarreaga (1998), ‘Preferential and non-preferential trade flows in world trade’, Staff Working paper No. ERAD-98-10, September, World Trade Organization, Geneva.
104. Gundlach, E., U. Hiemenz, R. Langhammer, P. Langhammer and P. Nunnenkamp (1993), ‘Regional integration in Europe and its impact on developing countries’, in K. Ohno (ed.), Regional Integration and Its Impact on Developing Countries, Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, pp.134–158.
105. Hamilton, C. and J. Whalley (1996), The World Trading System after the Uruguay Round, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
106. Hansen, G. (2001), ‘Should countries promote foreign direct investment?’, Discussion Paper Series No. 9, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, G-24, Geneva.
107. Harris, R. and D. Cox (1986), ‘Quantitative assessment of the economic impact on Canada of sectoral free trade with the United States’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19 (2), 377–394.
108. Hertel, T.W., T. Walmsley and K. Itakura (2002), ‘Dynamic effects of the “new age” free trade agreement between Japan and Singapore’, research report, Global Trade Analysis Project, Perdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
109. Heydon, K. (2002), ‘RIA market access and regulatory provisions’, paper presented at the conference on The Changing Architecture of the Global Trading System, organized by the World Trade Organization, Geneva, 26 April.
110. Hirschman, A.O. (1958), The Strategy of Economic Growth, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
111. Hoekman, B.M. and M.M. Kostecki (2001), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112. Hoekman, B.M., M. Schiff and L.A. Winters (1998), ‘Regionalism and development: main message from recent World Bank research’, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.
113. Hufbauer, G. (1994), Latin America Economic Integration, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
114. Hufbauer, G. and J. Schott (1994), ‘Regionalism in North America’, in K. Ohno (ed.), Regional Integration and Its Impact on Developing Countries, Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.
115. IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2002a), ‘Integration and trade in the Americas’, Washington, DC. Available on the Internet at http://www.iadb.org.int/itd/, accessed 22 December 2002.
116. IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2002b), Integration, Trade and Hemispheric Issues, Washington, DC: IDB.
117. IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2003), Beyond Borders: The New Regionalism in Latin America, Washington, DC: IDB.
118. Ikenberry, J.G. (2000), ‘The political economy of Asia-Pacific regionalism’, East Asian Economic Perspective, March, 35–61.
119. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2003), World Economic Outlook, Washington, DC: IMF.
120. JSG (Joint Study Group) (2000a), Report on Free Trade Agreement between Japan and Singapore, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore.
121. JSG (Joint Study Group) (2000b), Japan-Singapore Economic Agreement for a New Age Partnership, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore.
122. Keller, W. (1998), ‘Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched partners’, European Economic Review, 42 (8), 1469–1481.
123. KIEP (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy) (2000), ‘Economic effects and policy direction for Korea-Japan FTA’, Seoul: KIEP.
124. Kohler, H. (2001), ‘Opening remarks at press conference’, Tokyo. Japan National Press Club. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2001/011201.htm, accessed 12 January.
125. Kojima, K. (1968), Pacific Trade and Development, Tokyo: Japan Economic Research Center.
126. Kose, M. A. and R. Riezman (1999), ‘Understanding the welfare implications of preferential trade agreements’, CSGR Working Paper No. 45/99, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick.
127. Kose, M. A. and R. Riezman (2000), ‘Small countries and preferential trade agreements: how severe is the innocent bystander problem?’, CSGR Working Paper No. 48/00, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick.
128. Kreinen, M. (1982), ‘Effect of EC enlargement on trade in manufactures’, Kyklos, 108 (3), 110–138.
129. Kreinen, M. (1998), ‘Multinationalism, regionalism, and their implications for Asia’, paper presented at the Conference on Global Interdependence and Asia-Pacific Cooperation, 8–10 June, Hong Kong.
130. Krueger, A.O. (1996), ‘Free trade agreements versus customs union’, NBER Working Paper No. 3476, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
131. Krueger, A.O. (1999), ‘Trade creation and trade diversion under NAFTA’, NBER Working Paper No. w7429, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
132. Krugman, P. (1991a), ‘Is bilateralism bad?’, in E. Helpman and A. Razin (eds), International Trade and Trade Policy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.9–24.
133. Krugman, P. (1991b), ‘The move towards free trade zones’, in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas, pp.7–41.
134. Laird, S. (1995), ‘Trade liberalization in Latin America’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 4 (1), 101–127.
135. Laird, S. (1997), Mercosur: Objectives and Achievements, paper presented at the third annual World Bank Conference on Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, Montevideo, September.
136. Lamy, P. (2002), ‘Facing the challenge of globalization: regional integration or multilateral rules’, Buenos Aires. Available on the Internet at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/trade/speeches_articles/spla99_en.htm, accessed 1 March.
137. Lawrence, R.Z. (1996), ‘Regionalism, multilateralism, and deeper integration’, research paper, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
138. Lee, H. and D. Roland-Holst (1998), ‘Prelude to the Pacific century: overview of the region’, in H. Lee and D. Roland-Holst (eds), Economic Development and Cooperation in the Pacific Basin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.3–36.
139. Lejour, A.M., R.A. de Mooij and R. Nahuis (2001), ‘EU enlargement: economic implications for countries and industries’, CESifo Working Paper No. 585, Center for Economic Studies and Institute for Economic Research, Munich.
140. Lewis, J.D., S. Robinson and K. Theirfelder (1999), ‘After the negotiations: assessing the impact of free trade agreements in Southern Africa’, TMD Discussion Paper No. 27, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
141. Linneman, H. (1996), An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
142. Lipsey, R. (1960), ‘The theory of customs unions: a general survey’, Economic Journal, 10 (2), 498–513.
143. Lloyd, P.J. (1997), ‘The future of trans-Tasman closer economic relations’, Agenda, 2 (3), 267–280.
144. Lopez-Cordova, J.E. (2001), ‘NAFTA and the Mexican economy: analytical issues and the lessons for the FTAA’, Occasional Paper No. 9, Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean (INTAL), Buenos Aires, November.
145. Low, L. (2001), ‘Rise of regionalism’, available on the Internet at http://www.mti.gov.sg/public/infocentre/pdfFiles/Regionalism.pdf, accessed 15 February 2001.
146. Machlup, F. (1977), A History of Thought on Economic Integration, London: Macmillan.
147. Markusen, A. and C.C. Diniz (2003), ‘The differential competitiveness of Latin American regions: opportunities and constraints’, paper presented at a seminar organized by the Inter-American Development Bank on Global and Local: Confronting the Challenges of Regional Development, 22 March, Milan.
148. Mattoo, A. and C. Fink (2003), ‘Regional agreements and trade in services: policy issues’, Journal of Economic Integration (forthcoming).
149. McCleery, R. (1993), ‘Modeling NAFTA: macroeconomic effects’, in K. Ohno (ed.), Regional Integration and Its Impact on Developing Countries, Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, pp.42–60.
150. McMillan, J. (1993), ‘Does regional integration foster open trade? Economic theory and GATT’s Article XXIV’, in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds), Regional Integration and Global Trading System, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.203–241.
151. McNulty, S. (2001), ‘Singapore seeks strength via Asian model of integration’, Financial Times, 11 January, p.6.
152. Meade, J.E. (1955), The Theory of Customs Union, Amsterdam: North Holland.
153. Meltzer, A. (1991), ‘US leadership and post-war progress’, in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp.237–258.
154. Michaely, M. (1998), ‘Partners to a preferential trade agreement: implications of varying size’, Journal of International Economics, 46 (1), 73–85.
155. Midelfart-Knarvik, K-H. and H.G. Overman (2002), ‘Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified?’, Economic Policy, 35 (2), 321–359.
156. Midelfart-Knarvik, K-H., H.G. Overman, S. Redding and A.J. Venables (1999), The Location of Industry in Europe, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
157. Milner, C. and R. Read (2002), ‘Introduction: the GATT Uruguay Round, trade liberalization and the WTO’, in C. Milner and R. Read (eds), Trade Liberalization, Competition and the WTO, Cheltenham: UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp.1–22.
158. Monteagudo, A.S. and Y. Watanaki (2002), ‘Asymmetries and cooperation in the free trade areas of the Americas’, paper presented at the conference on Confronting the Challenges of Regional Development in Latin America, held in Milan, Italy, on 22 March.
159. Moore, M. (2000), ‘Globalizing Regionalism’, Press releases. WTO News, Geneva. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/spmm_e/spmm45_e.htm, accessed November 2000.
160. Mundell, R. (1964), ‘Tariff preferences and terms of trade’, Manchester School Economic Social Studies, 32, 1–13.
161. Nagarajan, N. (1998), ‘On the evidence for trade diversion in MERCOSUR’, Integration and Trade, 2 (6), 3–30.
162. Ng, F. and A. Yeats (2003), ‘Major trade trends in Asia’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3084, World Bank, Washington, DC.
163. Noland, M. (1994), ‘Asia and the NAFTA’, in Y.S. Kim and K.S. Oh (eds), The US-Korea Economic Partnership, Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishers, 134–148.
164. Nordstrom, H. (1995), ‘Customs unions, regional trading blocs and welfare’, in R.E. Baldwin, P. Haaparanta and J. Kinder (eds), Expanding Membership of European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.54–78.
165. Ocampo, J.A. (2003), ‘Asymmetries and co-operation in the Free Trade Area of Americas’, paper presented at a seminar organized by the Inter-American Development Bank on Global and Local: Confronting the Challenges of Regional Development in Milan, on 22 March.
166. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2000), One Year On, Paris: OECD.
167. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2001), An Economic Survey of Euro Area, Paris: OECD.
168. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2002), Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximizing Benefits and Minimizing Costs, Paris: OECD.
169. Ohmae, Kenichi (1985), Triad Power, MacMillan Free Press.
170. Page, S. (2000), Regionalism among Developing Countries, London: Macmillan.
171. Panagariya, A. (1998), ‘Should East Asia go regional?’, in H. Lee, D.W. Roland-Holst (eds), Economic Development and Cooperation in the Pacific Basin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.119–159.
172. Panagariya, A. (1999), ‘The regional debate: an overview’, World Economy, 22 (4), 477–511.
173. Perroni, C. and J. Whally (1996), ‘How severe is global retaliation risk under increasing regionalism?’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 86, 57–61.
174. Petri, P. (1994), ‘The East Asian trading bloc: an analytical history’, in R. Garnaut and P. Drysdale (eds), Asia Pacific Regionalism: Readings in International Economic Relations, Sydney: Harper Educational Publishers, pp.107–124.
175. Petri, P. (1997), ‘Measuring and comparing progress in APEC’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 14 (1), 44–62.
176. Pomfret, R. (1995), ‘APEC and the lessons of Asian growth’, Policy Discussion Paper No. 95/09, Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide.
177. Poyhonen, P. (1963), ‘A tentative model for the flows of trade between countries’, Weltwirtschatftliches Archiv, 90 (1), 85–104.
178. Puga, D. (2002), ‘European regional policy in the light of recent location theories’, Journal of Economic Geography, 2 (4), 372–406.
179. Ravenhill, J. (2003), ‘The move to preferential trade in the western Pacific rim’, Asia-Pacific Issues, No. 69, June, Honolulu, Hawai’I, East–West Centre.
180. Riezman, R. (1999), ‘Can bilateral trade agreements help induce free trade?’, CSGR Working Paper No. 44/99, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick.
181. Roessler, F. (1993), ‘The relationship between regional integration agreements and the multilateral trade order’, in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds), Regional Integration and the Global Trading System, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.180–202.
182. Rutherford, T.F. and J. Martinez (2000), ‘Welfare effects of regional trade integration of Central American and Caribbean nations with NAFTA and MERCOSUR’, World Economy, June, 799–825.
183. Sachs, J.D. and A. Warner (1995), ‘Economic reform and the process of global integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp.1–118.
184. Safadi, R. and A. Yeats (1993), ‘The North American Free Trade Agreement: its effect on South Asia’, Journal of Asian Economics, 5 (2), 197–216.
185. Sager, M.A. (1997), ‘Regional trade agreements: their role and the economic impact on trade flows’, The World Economy, 20 (1), January, 239–273.
186. Sakakibara, E. and S. Yamakawa (2003), ‘Regional integration in East Asia: challenges and opportunities’, Part I and Part II, Keio University.
187. Schiff, M. (1997), ‘Small is beautiful: preferential trade agreements and the impact of country size’, Journal of Economic Integration, 12 (2), 359–387.
188. Schiff, M. (1999), ‘Will the real “natural trading partner” please stand up?’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2161, World Bank, Washington, DC.
189. Schiff, M. (2001), ‘Multilateral trade liberalization, political disintegration, and the choice of free trade agreements versus customs unions’, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.
190. Schiff, M. (2002), ‘Regional integration and development in small states’, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.
191. Schiff, M. and L.A. Winters (2003), Regional Integration and Development, New York: Oxford University Press.
192. Schill, M. (1996), Small is Beautiful, Working Paper No. 1668, World Bank, Washington, DC.
193. Schott, J.J. (2002), ‘Trade pacts with big powers are essential for developing countries’, Financial Times, 6 November, p.12.
194. Scollay, R. (1994), ‘Open regionalism and regional trading arrangements’, in G. Yen (ed.), New Directions in Regional Trade Liberalization and Investment Cooperation, Singapore: Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, pp.120–146.
195. Scollay, R. (2000), ‘CER: future developments’, in D. Robertson (ed.), AFTA-CER: A Way Forward?, Melbourne: Melbourne Business School, pp.68–90.
196. Sender, H. (2001), ‘China steps up chip production’, Asian Wall Street Journal, January 10, pp.N1–N2.
197. Serra Puche, J. (1998), ‘Regionalism and the WTO’, paper presented at the World Trade Organization Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland, 50 Years: Looking Back, Looking Forward, on 30 April.
198. Sharer, R. (1999), ‘Trade: an engine of growth for Africa’, Finance and Development, 36 (4), 22–25.
199. Smith, M. and A.J. Venables (1988), ‘Completing the internal market in European Community: some industry simulations’, European Economic Review, 32 (8), 1501–1525.
200. Solonga, I. and L. Alan Winters (1999), ‘How has regionalism in the 1990s affected trade?’, Policy Research Working Paper 2156, World Bank, Washington, DC.
201. Spinanger, D. (2002), ‘RIAs and contingent protection: are anti-dumping measures really an issue?’, paper presented at the conference on The Changing Architecture of the Global Trading System, organized by the World Trade Organization on 26 April, in Geneva.
202. Srinivasan, T.N. and G. Canonero (1993), ‘Preferential trading arrangements: estimating the effects on South Asian countries’, mimeo, Yale University and the World Bank.
203. Srinivasan, T.N. and G. Canonero (1995), ‘Preferential trading arrangements in South Asia: theory, empirics and policy’, mimeo, Yale University and the World Bank.
204. Stiglitz, J. (2002), Globalization and its Discontents, New York: W.W. Norton.
205. Summers, L.H. (1991), ‘Regionalism and the world trading systems’, in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp.295–302.
206. Suppel, R. (2000), Emerging Europe’s EU Accession: The Economics’, London: Morgan Guaranty Trust Company.
207. Tinbergen, J. (1966), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
208. Trachtman, J.P. (2003), ‘Toward open regionalism? Standardization and regional integration under Article XXIV of the GATT’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6 (2), 230–256.
209. Trebilcock, M.J., M.A. Chandler and R. Howse (1990), Trade and Transitions, London: Routledge.
210. UN (United Nations) (2001), World Economic Situation and Prospects 2001, New York: UN.
211. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2000), The World Investment Report 2000, Geneva and New York: UNCTAD.
212. Vamvakidis, A. (1997), ‘International integration and economic growth’, PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, Harvard University.
213. Vamvakidis, A. (1998), ‘Regional integration and economic growth’, World Bank Economic Review, 12 (2), 251–270.
214. Vamvakidis, A. (1999), ‘Regional trade agreements or broad liberalization: which path leads to faster growth?’, IMF Staff Papers, 46 (1), 42–68.
215. Vedrine, H. (2000), ‘A greater Europe by reform’, Financial Times, 7 September, p.14.
216. Venables, A.J. (2002), ‘Winners and losers from regional integration agreements’. Available on the Internet at http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/ajv/research_material.html#regint, accessed April 2003.
217. Venables, A.J. (2004), ‘Regional integration agreements: a force for convergence or divergence?’, Economic Journal.
218. Venables, A.J. and L.A. Winters (2003), ‘Economic integration in the Americas: European perspectives’, unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics.
219. Viner, J. (1950), The Customs Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
220. Wain, B. (2000), ‘Asia-Pacific body loses its way’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 10 November, p.8.
221. WB (World Bank) (2000), Trade Blocs, New York: Oxford University Press.
222. Whalley, J. (2000), ‘Why do countries seek regional trade agreements?’, Working Paper No. 5552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
223. Winters, L.A. (1999), ‘Regionalism for developing countries: assessing costs and benefits’, in J. Burki, G. Perry and S. Calvo (eds), Trade: Towards Open Regionalism, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp.141–185.
224. Winters, L.A. (2000), ‘Regionalism and multilateralism: what do economists have to say?’, DEC Note, Washington, DC: World Bank.
225. Wolf, H. (2000), ‘(Why) do borders matter for trade?’, in G. Hess and E. van Wincoop (eds), International Macroeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.159–186.
226. World Investment Report (2000), New York and Geneva: United Nations.
227. WTO (World Trade Organization) (1995), ‘Regional and the world trading systems’, report, Geneva.
228. WTO (World Trade Organization) (1998), ‘Report of the Committee on Regional Trade Agreements to the General Council’, WT/REG/7, Geneva.
229. WTO (World Trade Organization) (1999), Annual Report 1999, Geneva: WTO.
230. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2001), ‘WTO Ministerial Conference: Briefing Notes’, Geneva. Available on the Internet at http://www.heva.wtoministerial.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/minist01_e/brief_e/brief01.
231. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2001a), ‘Doha Ministerial Communiqué’, published by the WTO on 14 November 2001.
232. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2002a), ‘Regional trade integration under transformation’, background paper prepared by the Trade Policy Review Division of the WTO for the conference on The Changing Architecture of the Global Trading System, organized by the World Trade Organization on 26 April, Geneva.
233. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2002b), Basic Information on Regional Trade Agreements, WT/REG.W/44, Committee on Regional Trade Agreements, Geneva.
234. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2002c), Annual Report 2002, Geneva: WTO.
235. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2003),’Trade liberalization statistics’, available on the WTO website at http://www.gatt.org/July 02.
236. WTO (World Trade Organization) (2003a), ‘A changing landscape of RTAs’, published by the WTO on 14 November 2001.
237. Yamazawa, I. (1998), ‘Progress towards the Bogor target: a quantitative assessment’, report, Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, Japan Committee, Tokyo.
238. Yamazawa, I. (2000), ‘Regional cooperation in a changing global environment: success and failure of East Asia’, paper presented at the UNCTAD X, High-Level Round Table on Trade and Development, in Bangkok, 12 February.
239. Yeats, A. (1998), ‘What can be expected from African regional trade agreements? Some empirical evidence’, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.
240. Yi, S.S. (1997), ‘Stable coalition structures with externalities’, Games and Economic Behavior, 20 (1), 201–31.
241. Zissimos, B. and D. Vines (2000), ‘Is WTO’s Article XXIV a free trade barrier?’, CSGR Working Paper No. 49/00, Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick, February.
242. Zoellick, R.B. (2002), ‘Falling behind on free trade’, New York Times, Section 4, 14 April, p.13.