Green futures for industrial brownfields

The Humane Metropolis: People and Nature in the 21st-Century City

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 154-168

  De Sousa, Christopher A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896213502     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Bartsch, C. 1996. Paying for our industrial past. Commentary (Winter):14-24.
2. Bibby, P., and J. Shepherd. 1999. Refocusing national brownfield housing targets. Town and Country Planning 68(10):302-6.
3. Bolitzer, B., and N. R. Netusil. 2000. The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. Environmental Management 59:185-93.
4. Box, J., and P. Shirley. 1999. Biodiversity, brownfield sites and housing. Town and Country Planning 68(10):306-9.
5. City of Chicago. 2002. Calumet open space reserve plan. Chicago: City of Chicago, Department of Planning and Development.
6. Council for Urban Economic Development. 1999. Brownfields redevelopment: Performance evaluation. Washington, DC: Council for Urban Economic Development.
7. Darlow, G. 2002. Lake Calumet: Where industry and nature meet. The Field 73(4):4-6.
8. De Sousa, C. 2001. Contaminated sites management: The Canadian situation in an international context. Journal of Environmental Management 62(2):131-54.
9. -. 2002. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: an examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 19(4):297-309.
10. -. 2003. Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning 62(4):181-98.
11. Garvin, A., and G. Berens. 1997. Urban parks and open space. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute and Trust for Public Land.
12. Groeneveld, T. 2002. Navigating the waters: Coordination of waterfront brownfields redevelopment. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
13. Harnik, P. 2000. Inside city parks. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute and Trust for Public Land.
14. Harrison, C., and G. Davies. 2002. Conserving biodiversity that matters: Practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. Journal of Environmental Management 65:95-108.
15. Hemson Consulting. 2000. The port area of Toronto: Maintaining a valuable asset. Toronto: Report prepared for Lafarge Canada Inc.
16. Historic Urban Plans. 1978. Milwaukee Wisconsin in 1882. Ithaca, NY: Copied from a lithograph produced in 1882 by Beck & Pauli in the Library of Congress.
17. Hough, M., B. Benson, and J. Evenson. 1997. Greening the Toronto Port Lands. Toronto: Waterfront Regeneration Trust.
18. International Economic Development Council. 2001. Converting brownfields to greenspace. Washington, DC: International Economic Development Council.
19. Kaplan, R. 2001. The nature of the view from home. Environment and Behavior 33(4):507-42.
20. Kirkwood, N., ed. 2001. Manufactured sites. London: E & F Spon.
21. Kuo, F. E., M. Bacaicoa, and W. C. Sullivan. 1998. Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior 30(1):28-59.
22. Kweon, B., W. Sullivan, and A. Wiley. 1998. Green common spaces and the social integration of innercity older adults. Environment and Behavior 30(6):832-58.
23. Lerner, S., and W. Poole. 1999. The economic benefits of parks and open space. Washington, DC: Trust for Public Land.
24. Menomonee Valley Partners. 2003. Menomonee Valley Partners Home Page. Available online at http://www.renewthevalley.org/.
25. Meyer, P., R. Williams, and K. Yount. 1995. Contaminated land: Reclamation, redevelopment, and reuse in the United States and European Union. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
26. Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 1996. Guideline for use at contaminated sites in Ontario. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
27. Simons, R. 1998. Turning brownfields into greenbacks. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
28. Sixteenth Street Community Health Center. 2002. Menomonee River Valley national design competition, executive summary. Milwaukee: Competition sponsored by the Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, Menomonee Valley Partners Inc., the City of Milwaukee, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and Milwaukee County.
29. State of Wisconsin Brownfields Study Group. 2000. Brownfields Study Group final report. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
30. Stroup, R. L. 1997. Superfund: The shortcut that failed. In Breaking the environmental policy gridlock, ed. T. L. Anderson. Stanford, CT: Hoover Institution Press.
31. Thompson, J. W., and K. Sorvig. 2000. Sustainable landscape construction: A guide to green building outdoors. Washington, DC: Island Press.
32. Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Task Force. 2000. Our Toronto waterfront. Toronto: Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Task Force. Available online at http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/waterfront/fung-report.htm.
33. U. S. Conference of Mayors. 2000. Recycling America's land: A national report on brownfields redevelopment,. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Mayors.
34. U. S. National Parks Service Midwest Region. 1998. Calumet Ecological Park feasibility study. Washington, DC: National Park Service. Available online at http://www.lincolnnet.net/environment/feasibility/calumet3.html.
35. Warson, A. 1998. Toronto's waterfront revival. Urban Land (January):54-59.
36. Wenk Associates. 2002. A vision for the Menomonee River Valley. Prepared for the Menomonee River Valley national design competition, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, sponsored by the City of Milwaukee Department of Environmental Health, the Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, and other stakeholders.
37. WRC [Waterfront Revitalization Corporation]. 2002. Priority projects. Available online at http://www.towaterfront.ca.