Property without community: The (frequent) consequence of tax exemptions for non-profit institutions

Private Property in the 21st Century: The Future of an American Ideal

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 125-142

  Krueckeberg, Donald A ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b American Institute of Certified Planners   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896178046     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781008461.00016     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Aaron, H.J. (1992). Commentary. In C.T. Clotfelter (ed.), Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 237-43.
2. Biddle, J.E. (1992). Religious organizations. In C.T. Clotfelter (ed.), Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 92-133.
3. Brody, E. (2002). Legal theories of tax exemption: A sovereignty perspective. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 145-72.
4. Carbone, N.R. and Brody, E. (2002). PILOTs: Hartford and Connecticut. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 233-52.
5. Christman, J. (1994). The Myth of Property: Toward an egalitarian theory of ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Clotfelter, C.T. (1992). Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Colombo, J.D. (1993). Why is Harvard tax-exempt? (And other mysteries of tax exemption for private educational institutions). Arizona Law Review, 35, 841-903.
8. Cordes, J.J., Gantz, M. and Pollak, T. (2002). What is the property-tax exemption worth? In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 81-112.
9. Diamond, S. (2002). Efficiency and benevolence: Philanthropic tax exemptions in 19th century America. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 115-44.
10. Downs, A. (2002). Review of The Homevoter Hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies, by William Fischel. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 456.
11. Federal Reserve System. (2002). Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States: Annual flows and outstandings, 1995-2001. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve System.
12. Fischel, W.A. (2001). The Homevoter Hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Gallagher, J. (2002). The legal structure of property-tax exemption. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 3-22.
14. Glancey, D.B. (2002). PILOTs: Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 211-32.
15. Grimm, R.T., Jr. (2002). Targeting the charitable property-tax exemption to collective goods. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 321-49.
16. Hall, P.D. (2002). Is tax exemption intrinsic of contingent? Tax treatment of voluntary associations, nonprofit organizations, and religious bodies in New Haven, Connecticut, 1750-2000. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 253-98.
17. James, E. (1992). Commentary. In C.T. Clotfelter (ed.), Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 244-55.
18. Kay, D., Brown, W.A. and Allee, D.J. (1989). University and Local Government Fiscal Relations, IHELG Monograph 89-2. Houston, TX: University of Houston Law Center, Institute for Higher Education Law and Governance.
19. Kelly, F. and Wuensch, J. (2000). Assessment of reform in Indiana: One step forward, two steps back. Land Lines: Newsletter of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, (November), 1-3.
20. Leland, P.J. (1994). Responding to a property tax challenge: Lessons learned in Pennsylvania. The Exempt Organization Tax Review, 6, 1359-73.
21. Locke, J. (1993). Two Treatises of Government. (Edited by Mark Goldie.) London: Everyman.
22. Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.
23. Minnesota Taxpayers Association. (2001). 50-state property tax comparison study executive summary: Payable year 2000. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Taxpayers Association in cooperation with The National Taxpayers Conference.
24. Netzer, D. (2002). Local government finance and the economics of property-tax exemption. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 47-80.
25. Pomp, R.D. (2002). The collision between nonprofits and cities over the property tax: Possible solutions. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 383-91.
26. Radin, M.J. (1993). Reinterpreting Property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Salamon, L.M. (1992). Social services. In C.T. Clotfelter (ed.), Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 134-73.
28. Salkever, D.S. and Frank, R.G. (1992). Health services. In C.T. Clotfelter (ed.), Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 24-54.
29. Youngman, J.M. (2002). The politics of the property-tax debate: Political issues. In E. Brody (ed.), Property Tax Exemptions for Charities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp. 23-46.