Lean Product Development: Serious Game and evaluation of the learning outcomes

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 397, Issue PART 1, 2013, Pages 590-597

  Kerga, Endris ^a   Akaberi, Armin ^a   Taisch, Marco ^a   Rossi, Monica ^a   Terzi, Sergio ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Lean Product Development; Serious Game; Set Based Concurrent Engineering

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; MANAGEMENT;

GAME PLAYS; LEAN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; LEAN THINKING; LEARNING OUTCOME; PRODUCT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; SERIOUS GAMES; SET-BASED CONCURRENT ENGINEERINGS; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84896096939     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40352-1_74     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Sobek, D. K., Ward, A. C., Liker, J. K.: Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering. Sloan Management Review 40, 67-83 (1999).
2. Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J., Sobek II, D. K.: The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster. Sloan Management Review 36, 43-61 (1995).
3. Oosterwal, D. P.: The Lean Machine: How Harley-Davidson Drove Top-Line Growth and Profitability with Revolutionary Lean Product Development. American Management Association, New York (2010).
4. Rossi, M., Kerga, E., Taisch, M., Terzi, S.: Lean Product Development: Fact Finding Research in Italy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Metz, France, May 25-27 (2011).
5. Wouters, P., van der Spek, E. D., Oostendorp, H.: Measuring learning in serious games: a case study with structural assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development 59(6), 741-763 (2011).
6. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J. E.: Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation and Gaming 33(4), 441-467 (2002).
7. Ford, D. N., Sobek, D. K.: Adapting Real Options to New Product Development by Modeling the Second Toyota Paradox. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(2), 175-185 (2005).
8. Kennedy, M. N.: Product Development for the Lean Enterprise: Why Toyota system is four times more productive and how you can implement it. The Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge (2008).
9. Liker, J. K., Sobek, D. K., Ward, A. C., Cristiano, J.: Involving Suppliers in Product Development in the United States and Japan: Evidence for Set-Based Concurrent Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43, 165 (1996).
10. Bernstein, J. I.: Design Methods in the Aerospace Industry: Looking for Evidence of Set-Based Practices. Master Thesis, Engineering Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1998).
11. Frye, M. C.: Applying Set Based Methodology in Submarine Design. Master Thesis, System Design and management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2010).