Delft aerospace tunnel-in-the-sky flight tests

AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Kraeger, M ^a   Soijer, Marco W ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

APPROACH TRAJECTORIES; CONTROL ACTIVITIES; FLIGHT EXPERIMENTS; FLIGHT TEST; INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS; PILOT PERFORMANCE; TUNNEL DISPLAYS;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84896050881     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Mulder, M., Cybernetics of a Tunnel-in-the-Sky Display, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 1999.
2. Jones, L. F., Schrader, H. J., and Marshall, J. N., Pictorial Display in Aircraft Navigation and Landing, Proceedings of the I.R.E., 1950, pp. 391-400.
3. Roscoe, S. N., Hasler, S. G., and Dougherty, D. J., Flight By Periscope: Making Takeoffs and Landings; The Influence of Image Magnification, Practice, and Various Conditions of Flight, Human Factors, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1966, pp. 13-40.
4. Kelley, C. R., Manual and Automatic Control. A Theory of Manual Control and its Application to Manual and to Automatic Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1967.
5. Wilckens, V. and Schattenmann, W., Test Results with New Analog Displays for All Weather Landing, AGARD Conference Proceedings Problems of the Cockpit Environment, Vol. CP-55, 1968, pp. 10.1-10.33.
6. Knox, C. E. and Leavitt, J., Description of a Path-in-the-Sky Contact Analog Piloting Display, NASA Technical Memorandum TM-74057, Washington (D.C.), 1977.
7. Grunwald, A. J., Robertson, J. B., and Hatfield, J. J., Experimental Evaluation of a Perspective Tunnel Display for Three-Dimensional Helicopter Approaches, Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1981, pp. 623-631.
8. Roscoe, S. N. and Jensen, R. S., Computer-Animated Predictive Displays for Microwave Landing Approaches, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-11, No. 11, 1981, pp. 760-765.
9. Andre, A. D., Wickens, C. D., Moorman, L., and Boschelli, M. M., Display Formatting Techniques for Improving Situation Awareness in the Aircraft Cockpit, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1991, pp. 205-218.
10. Haskell, I. D. and Wickens, C. D., Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays for Aviation: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1993, pp. 87-109.
11. Parrish, R. V., Busquets, A. M., Williams, S. P., and Nold, D. E., Spatial Awareness Comparisons Between Large-Screen, Integrated Pictorial Displays and Conventional EFIS Displays During Simulated Landing Approaches, NASA Technical Paper TP-3467, Washington (D.C.), 1994.
12. Below, C, von Viebahn, H., and Hammer, M., 4D Flight Guidance Displays, Proceedings of the SPIE Technical Conference Synthetic Vision for Vehicle Guidance and Control. Aerosense, Orlando, Vol. 2463, 1995, pp. 137-145.
13. Regal, D. and Whittington, D., Guidance Symbology for Curved Flight Paths, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium, on Aviation Psychology, Columbus (OH), April 24-27, 1995, 1995, pp. 74-79.
14. O1iver, J. G., Improving Situational Awareness Through the Use of Intuitive Pictorial Displays, Society of Automotive Engineers, Vol. SAE Technical Paper 901829, 1990, pp. 1-6.
15. Barfield, W. and Rosenberg, C, The Effect of Geometric Field of View and Tunnel Design for Perspective Flight-Path Displays, Society of Automotive Engineers, Vol. SAE Technical Paper 921131, 1992, pp. 1-6.
16. Funabiki, K., Tunnel-in-the-Sky Display Enhancing Autopilot Mode Awareness, Conference proceedings of the 1997 CEAS Free Flight Symposium, 1997, pp. 29.1-29.11.
17. Grunwald, A. J., Tunnel Display for Four-Dimensional Fixed-Wing Aircraft Approaches, Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1984, pp. 369-377.
18. Grunwald, A. J., Improved Tunnel Display for Curved Trajectory Following: Experimental Evaluation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1996, pp. 378-384.
19. Dorighi, N. S., Ellis, S. R., and Grunwald, A. J., Evaluation of Perspective Displays on Pilot Spatial Awareness in Low Visibility Curved Approaches, AIAA-91-3727-CP, 1991, pp. 153-158.
20. Funabiki, K., Muraoka, K., Terui, Y., Harigae, M., and Ono, T., In-Flight Evaluation of Tunnel-in-the-Sky Display and Curved Approach Pattern, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, No. AIAA 99-3966, 1999, pp. 1-7.
21. Theunissen, E., Integrated Design of a Man-Machine Interface for 4-D Navigation, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 1997.
22. Kornfeld, R. P., Hansman, R. J., and Deyst, J. J., The Impact of GPS Velocity Based Flight Control on Flight Instrumentation Architecture, MIT Report ICAT-99-5, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (MA), 02139 USA, 1999.
23. Sachs, G. and Sperl, R., Experimental Low Cost 3D-Display for General Aviation Aircraft, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Montreal, Canada, August 6-9, No. AIAA 2001-4195, 2002, pp. 1-10.
24. Mulder, M. and Mulder, J. A., Tunnel Size in a Tunnel-in-the-Sky Display: A Cybernetic Analysis, Proceedings of the Seventh IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Kyoto Japan, September 16-18, 1998, pp. 335-340.
25. Theunissen, E., A Primary Flight Display for Four-Dimensional Guidance and Navigation - Influence of Tunnel Size and Level of Additional Information on Pilot Performance and Control Behaviour, Proceedings of the AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, Monterey (CA), August 9-11, 1993, pp. 140-146.