Effect of addition of two-dimensional ZIF-L nanoflakes on the properties of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 460, Issue , 2014, Pages 9-17

  Low, Ze Xian ^a   Razmjou, Amir ^a   Wang, Kun ^a   Gray, Stephen ^b   Duke, Mikel ^b   Wang, Huanting ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Nanoflake; Polyethersulfone; Ultrafiltration; Zeolitic imidazolate framework

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; LOADING; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TWO DIMENSIONAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER FILTRATION;

CONSTANT PRESSURE FILTRATIONS; CONTACT ANGLE GONIOMETRY; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY; NANOFLAKE; POLYETHERSULFONE ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE; POLYETHERSULFONES; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES; ZEOLITIC IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORKS;

MICROFILTRATION;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYETHERSULFONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZEOLITIC IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORK;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOFOULING; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE GONIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; GONIOMETRY; HYDROPHILICITY; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MEMBRANE RESISTANCE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFLAKE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER PERMEABILITY; WETTABILITY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84895973496     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.026     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baker R. Membrane Technology and Applications 2012, Wiley, Chichester, England.
2. Susanto H., Ulbricht M. Characteristics, performance and stability of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes prepared by phase separation method using different macromolecular additives. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 327:125-135.
3. de Souza Araki M., de Morais Coutinho C., Gonçalves L.A.G., Viotto L.A. Solvent permeability in commercial ultrafiltration polymeric membranes and evaluation of the structural and chemical stability towards hexane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71:13-21.
4. Nunes S.P., Peinemann K.V. Membrane Technology: In the Chemical Industry 2006, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany.
5. Mansouri J., Harrisson S., Chen V. Strategies for controlling biofouling in membrane filtration systems: challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20:4567-4586.
6. Lai C.Y., Groth A., Gray S., Duke M. Enhanced abrasion resistant PVDF/nanoclay hollow fibre composite membranes for water treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 449:146-157.
7. Van der Bruggen B. Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114:630-642.
8. 2 composite membranes. Desalination 2002, 146:35-40.
9. 4 composite ultrafiltration membrane and its behavior in magnetic field. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 284:9-16.
10. 3-particle addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 276:162-167.
11. Vatanpour V., Madaeni S.S., Rajabi L., Zinadini S., Derakhshan A.A. Boehmite nanoparticles as a new nanofiller for preparation of antifouling mixed matrix membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 401-402:132-143.
12. 2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 378:73-84.
13. Huang J., Zhang K., Wang K., Xie Z., Ladewig B., Wang H. Fabrication of polyethersulfone-mesoporous silica nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes with antifouling properties. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 423-424:362-370.
14. Rahimpour A., Jahanshahi M., Khalili S., Mollahosseini A., Zirepour A., Rajaeian B. Novel functionalized carbon nanotubes for improving the surface properties and performance of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. Desalination 2012, 286:99-107.
15. Vatanpour V., Madaeni S.S., Moradian R., Zinadini S., Astinchap B. Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 375:284-294.
16. Hoek E.M.V., Ghosh A.K., Huang X., Liong M., Zink J.I. Physical-chemical properties, separation performance, and fouling resistance of mixed-matrix ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2011, 283:89-99.
17. Han R., Zhang S., Liu C., Wang Y., Jian X. Effect of NaA zeolite particle addition on poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) composite ultrafiltration (UF) membrane performance. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 345:5-12.
18. Al Malek S., Seman A., Johnson D., Hilal N. Formation and characterization of polyethersulfone membranes using different concentrations of polyvinylpyrrolidone. Desalination 2012, 288:31-39.
19. Idris A., Mat Zain N., Noordin M.Y. Synthesis, characterization and performance of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membranes with polyethylene glycol of different molecular weights as additives. Desalination 2007, 207:324-339.
20. Fan Z., Wang Z., Sun N., Wang J., Wang S. Performance improvement of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane by blending with polyaniline nanofibers. J. Memb. Sci. 2008, 320:363-371.
21. 2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane. J. Memb. Sci. 2007, 288:231-238.
22. Koo J. Polymer Nanocomposites: Processing, Characterization, and Applications 2006, McGraw-Hill.
23. Zornoza B., Tellez C., Coronas J., Gascon J., Kapteijn F. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 166:67-78.
24. Phan A., Doonan C.J., Uribe-Romo F.J., Knobler C.B., O[U+05F3]Keeffe M., Yaghi O.M. Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 43:58-67.
25. Banerjee R., Furukawa H., Britt D., Knobler C., O'Keeffe M., Yaghi O.M. Control of pore size and functionality in isoreticular zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their carbon dioxide selective capture properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:3875-3877.
26. Kitagawa S., Noro S.-i., Nakamura T. Pore surface engineering of microporous coordination polymers. Chem. Commun. 2006, 701-707.
27. 2 adsorption. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49:9500-9502.
28. Tam C.M., Tremblay A.Y. Membrane pore characterization-comparison between single and multicomponent solute probe techniques. J. Memb. Sci. 1991, 57:271-287.
29. Hlavacek M., Bouchet F. Constant flowrate blocking laws and an example of their application to dead-end microfiltration of protein solutions. J. Memb. Sci. 1993, 82:285-295.
30. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws-application to power-law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1982, V 60:183-187.
31. Chellam S., Xu W. Blocking laws analysis of dead-end constant flux microfiltration of compressible cakes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 301:248-257.
32. Wilcox C., Dove S., McDavid W., Greer D. UTHSCSA Image Tool 2002, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.
33. Verwey E., Overbeek J. Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids 1948, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
34. Wang Y.-N., Tang C.Y. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:6373-6379.
35. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2001, 188:115-128.
36. M.S.F.C.Adrnlnlstratlon Structure of serum albumin. Lipoproteins, Apolipoproteins, Lipases 1994, 45:153.