A randomised control trial of prompt and feedback devices and their impact on quality of chest compressions-A simulation study

Resuscitation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 553-559

  Yeung, Joyce ^a,b   Davies, Robin ^c   Gao, Fang ^a,b   Perkins, Gavin D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chest compression; Education; Feedback devices; Training

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; COMPRESSION DEPTH; COMPRESSION RATE; COMPRESSION THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPR FEEDBACK DEVICE; CPR MANIKIN; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METRONOME DEVICE; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRESSURE SENSOR FEEDBACK DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESCUE PERSONNEL; RESUSCITATION; SATISFACTION; SIMULATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; THORAX COMPRESSION; ACCELEROMETRY; ASSOCIATION; BODY SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; MANIKIN; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; BODY SIZE; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CUES; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MANIKINS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895927866     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Wik L., Steen P.A., Bircher N.G. Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 1994, 28:195-203.
2. Wik L. Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003, 58:267-269.
3. Abella B., Alvarado J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:305-310.
4. Babbs C.F., Voorhees W.D., Fitzgerald K.R., Holmes H.R., Geddes L.A. Relationship of blood pressure and flow during CPR to chest compression amplitude: evidence for an effective compression threshold. Ann Emerg Med 1983, 12:527-532.
5. Edelson D.P., Abella B.S., Kramer-Johansen J., et al. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006, 71:137-145.
6. Zuercher M., Hilwig R.W., Ranger-Moore J., et al. Leaning during chest compressions impairs cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow in piglet cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1141-1146.
7. Yu T., Weil M.H., Tang W., et al. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 2002, 106:368-372.
8. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
9. Olasveengen T.M., Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Sunde K., Pytte M., Steen P.A. Is CPR quality improving? A retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007, 75:260-266.
10. Perkins G.D., Boyle W., Bridgestock H., et al. Quality of CPR during advanced resuscitation training. Resuscitation 2008, 77:69-74.
11. Wik L., Myklebust H., Auestad B.H., Steen P.A. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation 2002, 52:273-279.
12. Wik L., Myklebust H., Auestad B.H., Steen P.A. Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback. Resuscitation 2005, 66:27-30.
13. Soar J.M., Mancini M.E., Bhanji F., et al. Part 12. Education implementation and teams: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 2010, 81:e288-e330.
14. Yeung J., Meeks R., Edelson D., Gao F., Soar J., Perkins G.D. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 2009, 80:743-751.
15. Milander M.M., Hiscok P.S., Sanders A.B., Kern K.B., Berg R.A., Ewy G.A. Chest compression and ventilation rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the effects of audible tone guidance. Acad Emerg Med 1995, 2:708-713.
16. Boyle A.J., Wilson A.M., Connelly K., McGuigan L., Wilson J., Whitbourn R. Improvement in timing and effectiveness of external cardiac compressions with a new non-invasive device: the CPR-Ezy. Resuscitation 2002, 54:63-67.
17. Perkins G.D., Augre C., Rogers H., Allan M., Thickett D.R. CPREzy: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed. Resuscitation 2005, 64:103-108.
18. Dine C.J., Gersh R.E., Leary M., Riegel B.J., Bellini L.M., Abella B.S. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:2817-2822.
19. Semeraro F., Frisoli A., Loconsole C., et al. Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study. Resuscitation 2013, 84:501-507.
20. Kramer-Johansen J., Edelson D.P., Losert H., Köhler K., Abella B.S. Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation 2007, 74:406-417.
21. Resusci Anne SkillTrainer Manikin description. At. http://www.laerdal.com/gb/doc/62/Resusci-Anne-SkillReporter%23.
22. Sherren P.B., Lewinsohn A., Wijayatilake D.S. Effects of bed height on the performance of chest compressions: clinical application of results. Emerg Med J 2011, 28:171.
23. Noordergraaf G.J., Drinkwaard B.W.P.M., van Berkom P.F.J., et al. The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model. Resuscitation 2006, 69:241-252.
24. CPREzy Frequently asked questions. ; 2011 [accessed 01.06.11]. http://www.cprezy.com/faq.html.
25. Aase S.O., Myklebust H. Compression depth estimation for CPR quality assessment using DSP on accelerometer signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002, 49:263-268.
26. Nolan J.P., Deakin C.D., Soar J., Bottiger B.W., Smith G., European Resuscitation C European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005, 67(Suppl. 1):S39-S86.
27. Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., Wik L., et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006, 71:283-292.
28. Perkins G.D., Kocierz L., Smith S.C., McCulloch R.A., Davies R.P. Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed. Resuscitation 2009, 80:79-82.
29. Gallagher E.J., Lombardi G., Gennis P. Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1995, 274:1922-1925.
30. Van Hoeyweghen R.J., Bossaert L.L., Mullie A., et al. Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR. Belgian Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group. Resuscitation 1993, 26:47-52.
31. Abella B.S., Sandbo N., Vassilatos P., et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005, 111:428-434.
32. Perkins G.D., Lockey A.S. Defibrillation-safety versus efficacy. Resuscitation 2008, 79:1-3.
33. Halperin H.R., Paradis N., Ornato J.P., et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:2214-2220.
34. Cohen T.J., Tucker K.J., Lurie K.G., et al. Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group. JAMA 1992, 267:2916-2923.
35. Nolan J., Smith G., Evans R., et al. The United Kingdom pre-hospital study of active compression-decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 1998, 37:119-125.
36. Hallstrom A., Rea T.D., Sayre M.R., et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006, 295:2620-2628.
37. Perkins G.D., Davies R.P., Quinton S., et al. The effect of real-time CPR feedback and post event debriefing on patient and processes focused outcomes: a cohort study: trial protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19:58.
38. Beckers S.K., Skorning M.H., Fries M., et al. CPREzy improves performance of external chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007, 72:100-107.
39. van Berkom P.F.J., Noordergraaf G.J., Scheffer G.J., Noordergraaf A. Does use of the CPREzy involve more work than CPR without feedback. Resuscitation 2008, 78:66-70.
40. Kern K.B., Sanders A.B., Raife J., Milander M.M., Otto C.W., Ewy G.A. A study of chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med 1992, 152:145-149.
41. Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Milander M., Tellez D., Liu P., Beyda D. Efficacy of audio-prompted rate guidance in improving resuscitator performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on children. Acad Emerg Med 1994, 1:35-40.
42. Oh J.H., Lee S.J., Kim S.E., Lee K.J., Choe J.W., Kim C.W. Effects of audio tone guidance on performance of CPR in simulated cardiac arrest with an advanced airway. Resuscitation 2008, 79:273-277.
43. Chiang W.-C., Chen W.-J., Chen S.-Y., et al. Better adherence to the guidelines during cardiopulmonary resuscitation through the provision of audio-prompts. Resuscitation 2005, 64:297-301.
44. Kern K.B., Stickney R.E., Gallison L., Smith R.E. Metronome improves compression and ventilation rates during CPR on a manikin in a randomized trial. Resuscitation 2010, 81:206-210.
45. Bohn A., Weber T.P., Wecker S., et al. The addition of voice prompts to audiovisual feedback and debriefing does not modify CPR quality or outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest-a prospective, randomized trial. Resuscitation 2011, 82:257-262.
46. Chiang W.C., Chen W.J., Chen S.Y., et al. Better adherence to the guidelines during cardiopulmonary resuscitation through the provision of audio-prompts. Resuscitation 2005, 64:297-301.
47. Fletcher D., Galloway R., Chamberlain D., Pateman J., Bryant G., Newcombe R.G. Basics in advanced life support: a role for download audit and metronomes. Resuscitation 2008, 78:127-134.
48. Havel C., van Tulder R., Schreiber W., et al. Randomized crossover trial comparing physical strain on advanced life support providers during transportation using real-time automated feedback. Acad Emerg Med 2011, 18:860-867.
49. Fischer H., Gruber J., Neuhold S., et al. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study. Resuscitation 2011, 82:902-907.
50. Abella B.S., Edelson D.P., Kim S., et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 2007, 73:54-61.
51. Niles D., Nysaether J., Sutton R., et al. Leaning is common during in-hospital pediatric CPR, and decreased with automated corrective feedback. Resuscitation 2009, 80:553-557.
52. Skorning M., Beckers S.K., Brokmann J.Ch., et al. New visual feedback device improves performance of chest compressions by professionals in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2010, 81:53-58.