Evaluating the hydrological component of the new catchment-scale sediment delivery model LAPSUS-D

Geomorphology

Volumn 212, Issue , 2014, Pages 97-107

  Keesstra, S D ^a   Temme, A J A M ^a   Schoorl, J M ^a   Visser, S M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Daily discharge modeling; Landscape evolution model LAPSUS; LAPSUS D; Meso scale catchments; Sediment yield estimation

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION; PEAK DISCHARGE; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT YIELD; WATER BUDGET;

POLAND;

EID: 84895922481     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe Boden Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung 2005, Hrsg.: Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe in Zusammenarbeit mit den Staatlichen Geologischen Diensten, (438 S.; 41 Abb., 103 Tab., 31 Listen, Hannover). 5. Aufl.
2. Aksoy H., Kavvas M.L. A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena 2005, 64(2-3):247-271.
3. Allen R.G., Pereira L.A., Raes D., Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 1998, FAO, Rome, (293 pp.).
4. Arora B., Mohanty B.P., McGuire J.T. Uncertainty in dual permeability model parameters for structured soils. Water Resources Research 2012, 48:1-17.
5. Berne A., Delrieu G., Creutin J., Obled C. Temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 299:166-179.
6. Beskow S., Mello C.R., Norton L.D., da Silva A.M. Performance of a distributed semi-conceptual hydrological model under tropical watershed conditions. Catena 2011, 86(3):160-171.
7. Beven K.J., Kirkby M.J., Schofield N., Tagg A.F. Testing a physically-based flood forecasting-model (Topmodel) for 3 UK catchments. Journal of Hydrology 1984, 69:1984.
8. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., Jobes T.H., Donigian A.S., Johansen R.C. Hydrological simulation program - Fortran. User's Manual for Release 1996, 11. U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, (678 pp.).
9. Buis E., Temme A.J.A.M., Veldkamp A., Boeken B., Jongmans A.G., van Breemen N., Schoorl J.M. Shrub mound formation and stability on semi-arid slopes in the Northern Negev Desert of Israel: a field and simulation study. Geoderma 2010, 156(3-4):363-371.
10. Claessens L., Knapen A., Mitutu M.G., Poesen J., Deckers J.A. Modelling landslide hazard, soil redistribution and sediment yield of landslides on the Ugandan footslopes of Mount Elgon. Geomorphology 2007, 90:23-35.
11. Claessens L., Schoorl J.M., Verburg P.H., Geraedts L., Veldkamp A. Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land-use change and landscape processes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2009, 129:157-170.
12. Coulthard T.J., Kirkby M.J., Macklin M.G. Modelling geomorphic response to environmental change in an upland catchment. Hydrological Processes 2000, 14:2031-2045.
13. Coulthard T.J., Hicks D.M., Van De Wiel M.J. Cellular modelling of river catchments and reaches: advantages, limitations and prospects. Geomorphology 2007, 90:192-207.
14. Dawes W., Hatton T. Topog_IRM: 1. model description. Technical Memorandum - CSIRO 1993, Division of Water Resources, Australia, (33 pp.).
15. De Roo A.P.J., Hazelhoff L., Heuvelink G.B.M. Estimating the effects of spatial variability of infiltration on the output of a distributed runoff and soil erosion model using Monte Carlo methods. Hydrological Processes 1992, 6:127-143.
16. De Roo A.P.J., Wesseling C.G., Ritsema C.J. LISEM: a single event physically-based hydrologic and soil erosion model for drainage basins: I. Theory, input and output. Hydrological Processes 1996, 108:1107-1117.
17. De Roo A.P.J., Offermans R.J.E., Cremers N.H.D.T. LISEM: a single event physically-based hydrologic and soil erosion model for drainage basins: II. Sensitivity analysis, validation and application. Hydrological Processes 1996, 108:1119-1126.
18. de Vente J., Poesen J. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth-Science Reviews 2005, 71:95-125.
19. Droogers P., Bouma J. Soil survey input in exploratory modeling of sustainable soil management practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1997, 61:1704-1710.
20. Gumiere S.J., Raclot D., Cheviron B., Davy G., Louchart X., Fabre J.-C., Moussa R., Bissonnais Y.L. MHYDAS-erosion: a distributed single-storm water erosion model for agricultural catchments. Hydrological Processes 2011, 25:1717-1728.
21. Higgitt D.L., Lu X.X. Sediment delivery to the three gorges: 1. Catchment controls. Geomorphology 2001, 41:143-156.
22. Holmgren P. Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: an empirical evaluation. Hydrological Processes 1994, 8:327-334.
23. Huisman J.A., Breuer L., Frede H.G. Sensitivity of simulated hydrological fluxes towards changes in soil properties in response to land-use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 2004, 29:749-758.
24. Keesstra S.D. Impact of natural reforestation on floodplain sedimentation in the Dragonja Basin, SW Slovenia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2007, 32:49-65.
25. Keesstra S.D., Bruijnzeel L.A., van Huissteden J. Constructing a sediment budget in a meso-scale catchment using a variety of methods: the Dragonja catchment, SW Slovenia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2009, 32:49-65.
26. Keesstra S.D., van Dam O., Verstraeten G., van Huissteden J. Changing sediment generation due to natural reforestation in the Dragonja catchment, SW Slovenia. Catena 2009, 78:60-71.
27. Kiter, M., Oczos, Z., 1973. Map of agricultural soils of Poland 1:500 000 IUNG Pulawy.
28. Laflen J.M., Lane L.J., Foster G.R. WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1991, 46:34-38.
29. Lesschen J.P., Schoorl J.M., Cammeraat L.H. Modelling runoff and erosion for a semi-arid catchment using a multi-scale approach based on hydrological connectivity. Geomorphology 2009, 109:174-183.
30. Littleboy M., Silburn D.M., Freebairn D.M. Impact of soil-erosion production in cropping systems 1: development and validation of a simulation model. Australian Journal of Soil Research 1992, 30:757-774.
31. Misra R.K., Rose C.W. Application and sensitivity analysis of process-based erosion model GUEST. European Journal of Soil Science 1996, 47:593-604.
32. Morgan R.P.C. A simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model. Catena 2001, 44:305-322.
33. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10:282-290.
34. Newham L.T.H., Letcher R.A., Jakeman A.J., Kobayashi T. A framework for integrated hydrologic, sediment and nutrient export modelling for catchment-scale management. Environmental Modelling and Software 2004, 19:1029-1038.
35. Niehoff D., Fritsch U., Bronstert A. Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 267:80-93.
36. Otto J.-C., Schrott L., Jaboyedoff M., Dikau R. Quantifying sediment storage in and high alpine valley (Turtmanntal, Switzerland). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2009, 34:1726-1742.
37. Refsgaard J.C., Storm B. MIKE SHE. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, 809-846. Water Resources Publications, CO, USA. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
38. Renard K.G., Foster G.R., Weesies G.A., McCool D.K., Yoder D.C. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation. RUSLE. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 703 1997, USDA, Washington, DC, (384 pp.).
39. Römkens M.J.M., Helming K., Prasad S.N. Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes. Catena 2002, 46:103-123.
40. Rowan J.S., Goodwill P., Greco M. Temporal variability in catchment sediment yield determined from repeated bathymetric surveys: Abbeystead Reservoir, U.K. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 1995, 20:199-206.
41. Savenije H.H.G. The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary. Hydrological Processes 2004, 18:1507-1511.
42. Schoorl J.M., Sonneveld M.P.W., Veldkamp A. Three-dimensional landscape process modelling: the effect of DEM resolution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2000, 25:1025-1034.
43. Schoorl J.M., Veldkamp A., Bouma J. Modeling water and soil redistribution in a dynamic landscape context. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2002, 66:1610-1619.
44. SCS Soil conservation service. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4 1972, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., (127 pp.).
45. Seeger M., Errea M.P., Beguería S., Arnáez J., Martí C., García-Ruiz J.M. Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish pyrenees. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 288:299-311.
46. Sheikh V., Visser S.M., Stroosnijder L. A simple model to predict soil moisture: Bridging Event and Continuous Hydrological (BEACH) modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software 2009, 24:542-556.
47. Smithers J.C., Caldecott R.E. Development and verification of hydrograph routing in a daily simulation model. Water SA 1993, 19(3):263-267.
48. Soulsby C., Tetzlaff D., Rodgers P., Dunn S., Waldron S. Runoff processes, stream water residence times and controlling landscape characteristics in a mesoscale catchment: an initial evaluation. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 325:197-221.
49. Temme A.J.A.M., Veldkamp A. Multi-process Late Quaternary landscape evolution modelling reveals lags in climate response over small spatial scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2009, 34:573-589.
50. Temme A.J.A.M., Schoorl J.M., Veldkamp A. Algorithm for dealing with depressions in dynamic landscape evolution models. Computers & Geosciences 2006, 32:452-461.
51. Temme A.J.A.M., Claessens L., Veldkamp A., Schoorl J.M. Evaluating choices in multi-process landscape evolution models. Geomorphology 2011, 125:271-281.
52. Thurow T.L., Blackburn W.H., Taylor C.A. Hydrologic characteristics of vegetation types as affected by livestock grazing systems. Edwards Plateau, Texas. Journal of Range Management 1986, 39:505-509.
53. Tucker G.E., Hancock G.R. Modelling landscape evolution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2010, 35(1):28-50.
54. Van De Wiel M.J., Coulthard T.J., Macklin M.G., Lewin J. Embedding reach-scale fluvial dynamics within the CAESAR cellular automaton landscape evolution model. Geomorphology 2007, 90(3-4):283-301.
55. Van Oost K., Govers G., Desmet P.J.J. Evaluating the effects of landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage. Landscape Ecology 2000, 15:577-589.
56. Vigiak O., van Dijck S.J.E., van Loon E.E., Stroosnijder L. Matching hydrologic response to measured effective hydraulic conductivity. Hydrological Processes 2006, 20:487-504.
57. Visser S.M., Sterk G., Karssenberg D. Modelling water erosion in the Sahel: application of a physically based soil erosion model in a gentle sloping environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2005, 30:1547-1566.
58. Wirtz S., Seeger M., Wagner J.-F., Ries J.B. Experimental validation of some basic assumptions used in physically based soil erosion models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2011, 8:1247-1286.
59. Wirtz S., Seeger M., Ries J.B. Field experiments for understanding and quantification of rill erosion processes. Catena 2012, 91:21-34.
60. Wissmeier L., Uhlenbrook S. Distributed, high-resolution modelling of (18)O signals in a meso-scale catchment. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 332:497-510.
61. Yen B.T., Orange D., Visser S.M., Hoanh C.T., Laissus M., Poortinga M., Toan T.M., Stroosnijder L. Lumped surface and sub-surface runoff for erosion modeling within a small hilly watershed in northern Vietnam. Hydrological Processes 2013, (in press).