Comparative economic analysis of gas turbine-based power generation and combined heat and power systems using biogas fuel

Energy

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 309-318

  Kang, Jun Young ^a   Kang, Do Won ^a   Kim, Tong Seop ^a   Hur, Kwang Beom ^b  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biogas; Combined cycle; Combined heat and power; Economic analysis; Gas turbine; Performance

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; COMBUSTION; COST ESTIMATING; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; GAS TURBINES; INVESTMENTS;

COMBINED CYCLE; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER SYSTEM; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; SEASONAL VARIATION; STRONG DEPENDENCES;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

BIOGAS; BIOMASS POWER; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INVESTMENT; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POWER GENERATION; PROFITABILITY; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SEASONAL VARIATION; TURBINE;

CHANDIPURA VIRUS;

EID: 84895921866     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gupta K.K., Rehman A., Sarviya R.M. Bio-fuels for the gas turbine: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:2946-2955.
2. Franco A., Giannini N. Perspectives for the use of biomass as fuel in combined cycle power plants. Int J Therm Sci 2005, 44:163-177.
3. Bhattacharya A., Manna D., Paul B., Datta A. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: energy and exergy based performance analysis. Energy 2011, 36:2599-2610.
4. Mueller S. Manure's allure: variation of the financial, power systems integrated with anaerobic digester at hog farms across geographic and economic regions. Renew Energy 2007, 32:248-256.
5. Basrawi M.F.B., Yamada T., Nakanishi K., Katsumata H. Analysis of the performances of biogas-fuelled micro gas turbine cogeneration systems (MGT-CGSs) in middle- and small-scale sewage treatment plants: comparison of performances and optimization of MGTs with various electrical power outputs. Energy 2012, 38:291-304.
6. Bruno J.C., Ortega-Lopez V., Coronas A. Integration of absorption cooling systems into micro gas turbine trigeneration systems using biogas: case study of a sewage treatment plant. Appl Energy 2009, 86:837-847.
7. Kang D.W., Kim T.S., Hur K.B., Park J.K. The effect of firing biogas on the performance and operating characteristics of simple and recuperative cycle gas turbine combined heat and power systems. Appl Energy 2012, 93:215-228.
8. Campanari S., Chiesa P., Silva P. Performance assessment of cogeneration systems industrial district applications 2007, ASME paper, GT2007-27659.
9. Konstantakos V., Pilavachi P.A., Polyzakis A., Theofylaktos C. Adecision support model for combined heat and power economic evaluation. Appl Therm Eng 2012, 42:129-135.
10. TeymouriHamzehkolaei F., Sattari S. Technical and economic feasibility study of using micro CHP in the different climate zones of Iran. Energy 2011, 36:4790-4798.
11. Lantz M. The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden - a comparison of different CHP technologies. Appl Energy 2012, 98:502-511.
12. Amiri S., Henning D., Karlsson B.G. Simulation and introduction of a CHP plant in a Swedish biogas system. Renew Energy 2013, 49:242-249.
13. Kim S.Y., Lee S.Y., Ryu J.W., Spitsyn V.E. Development of the 5MW power generation gas turbine engine 2011, ASME paper GT2011-45778.
14. GE-Energy GateCycle ver 6.0 2006.
15. Saravanamuttoo H.I.H., Roger G.F.C., Cohen H. Gas turbine theory 2001, PrenticeHall, Harlow, England. 5th ed.
16. Solar turbines Inc. Steam turbine assisted cogeneration systems (STAC). Available from: , [accessed, December 2013]. http://www.altorfer.com/power/powersystems/solar/.
17. Spencer R.G., Cotton K.C., Cannon C.N. Amethod for predicting the performance of steam turbine-generators: 16,500kW and larger. JEng Power 1963, 85:249-252.
18. Bahadori A., Vuthaluru H.B. Estimation of performance of steam turbines using a simple predictive tool. Appl Therm Eng 2010, 30:1832-1838.
19. Solar turbines Inc. Taurus 65 Gas turbine Generator set. Available from:. [accessed, December 2013]. http://mysolar.cat.com/cda/files/189639/7/ds65pg.pdf/.
20. Solar turbines Inc. Taurus 60 Gas turbine generator set. Available from: , [accessed, December 2013]. http://mysolar.cat.com/cda/files/126904/7/ds60pg.pdf/.
21. Thuesen G.J., Fabrycky W.J. Engineering economy 2001, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA. 9th ed.
22. Gas turbine world 2012 GTW handbook 2012, Pequot Publishing Inc., Fairfield, USA.
23. Simon G. Digester comparison study - technical, economic, and environmental performance of IEUA RP-5 digester and other dairy waste digesters 2003, Public Interest Energy Research Progra, California Energy Commission Report No:500-00-036. Available from:, [accessed, December 2013]. http://www.pierminigrid.org/FinalDeliverables/Project31/Task3.1.6/3.1.6.8_FinalReportApp_A-D.pdf.
24. US Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership Opportunities for and benefits of combined heat and power at wastewater treatment facilities 2007, Available from:, [accessed, December 2013]. http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/sustain/upload/2009_5_13_wwtf_opportunities.pdf.
25. Gas turbine world 2010 GTW handbook 2010, Pequot Publishing Inc., Fairfield, USA.
26. Korea power exchange 2011, [accessed, December 2013]. http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/.
27. Korea District Heating Corp [accessed, December 2013]. http://www.kdhc.co.kr/.
28. US Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power partnership Combined heat and power (CHP) level 1 feasibility analysis 2012, Available from:, [accessed, December 2013]. http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/sample_fa_ethanol.pdf.
29. US Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership Opportunities for combined heat and power at wastewater treatment facilities: market analysis and lesson from the field 2011, Available from:, [accessed, December 2013]. http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/wwtf_opportunities.pdf.
30. Palm R. The economic potential for production of upgraded biogas used as vehicle fuel in Sweden 2010, Chalmers Univ, Technical Report No FRT 2010:03. Available from:, [accessed, December 2013]. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/126342.pdf.