Optimization study of adsorption parameters for removal of phenol on aluminum impregnated fly ash using response surface methodology

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 852-859

  Chaudhary, Neeru ^a   Balomajumder, Chandrajit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Aluminum impregnated fly ash; Optimization; Phenol; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ALUMINUM; FLY ASH; PHENOLS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; ADSORPTION PARAMETERS; CENTRAL COMPOSITE ROTARY DESIGN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; INITIAL CONCENTRATION; OPTIMIZATION STUDIES; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84895921330     PISSN: 18761070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Yan J., Jianping W., Jing B., Daoquan W., Zongding H. Phenol biodegradation by the yeast candida tropicalis in the presence of m-cresol. Biochem Eng J 2006, 29:227-234.
2. Kumaran P., Paruchuri Y.L. Kinetics of phenol biotransformation. Water Res 1996, 31:11-22.
3. Querol X., Moreno N., Umana J.C., Alastuey A., Hernandez E., Lopez-Soler A., et al. Synthesis of zeolites from coal FA: overview. Int J Coal Geol 2002, 50:413-423.
4. Dash R.R., Balomajumder C., Kumar A. Treatment of metal cyanide bearing wastewater by simultaneous adsorption and biodegradation (SAB). J Hazard Mater 2008, 152:387-396.
5. Srivastava V.C., Swamy M.M., Mall I.D., Prasad B., Mishra I.M. Adsorptive removal of phenol by bagasse fly ash and activated carbon: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloids Surf A 2006, 272:89-104.
6. Radhika M., Palanivelu K. Adsorptive removal of chlorophenols from aqueous solution by low cost adsorbent-kinetics and isotherm analysis. J Hazard Mater 2006, B138:116-124.
7. Kamsonlian S., Majumder C.B., Chand S. Process parameter optimization and isothermal modeling: removal of arsenic (V) ion from contaminated water using palm bark (PB) biomass. Int J Eng Res Appl 2012, 2:2335-2339.
8. Gupta N., Balomajumder C., Agrawal V.K. Adsorption of cyanide ions on pressmud: a modeling approach. Chem Eng J 2012, 191:548-556.
9. Akgerman A., Zardkoohi M.J. Adsorption of phenolic compounds on fly ash. J Chem Eng Data 1996, 41:185-187.
10. Mondal P., Mohanty B., Majumder C.B. Removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater using GAC-Cu in batch reactor: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Can J Chem Eng 2011, 89:921-931.
11. Agarwal B., Thakur P.K., Balomajumder C. Use of iron-impregnated granular activated carbon for co-adsorptive removal of phenol and cyanide: insight into equilibrium and kinetics. Chem Eng Commun 2013, 200:1278-1292.
12. Banerjee S.S., Jayaram R.V., Joshi M.V. Removal of nickel (II) and zinc (II) from wastewater using fly ash and impregnated fly ash. Sep Sci Technol 2006, 38:1015-1032.
13. Bureau of Indian Standards IS 1350 (Part I). Methods of Test for Coal and Coke (Proximate Analysis) 1984, Manak Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
14. Baçaoui A., Yaacoubi A., Dahbi A., Bennouna C., Luu R.P.T., Maldonado-Hodar F.J., et al. Optimization of conditions for the preparation of activated carbons from olive-waste cakes. Carbon 2001, 39:425-432.
15. Holan Z.R., Volesky B. Biosorption of Pb and Ni by biomass of marine algae. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994, 43:1001.
16. Zulkali M.M.D., Ahmad A.L., Norulakmal N.H. Oryza sativa L. husk as heavy metal adsorbent: optimization with lead as model solution. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97:21.
17. Cojocaru C., Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface modeling and optimization of copper removal from aqua solutions using polymer assisted ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 2007, 298:56.
18. Tiwari B.K., Muthukumarappan K., Donnell C.P.O., Cullen P.J. Modelling colour degradation of orange juice by ozone treatment using response surface methodology. J Food Eng 2008, 88:553-560.
19. Azargohar R., Dalai A.K. Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: experimental and modeling studies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2005, 85:219-225.
20. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2001, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
21. Clarke G.M., Kempson R.E. Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Experiments 1997, Arnold, London.
22. Cornell J.A. How to Apply Response Surface Methodology 1990, American Society for Quality Control, Wisconsin. 2nd ed.
23. Box G., Draper N. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces 1987, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
24. Zainudin N.F., Lee K.T., Kamaruddin A.H., Bhatia S., Mohamed A.R. Study of adsorbent prepared from oil palm ash (OPA) for flue gas desulfurization. Sep Purif Technol 2005, 45:50-60.
25. Khuri A.I., Cornell J.A. Response Surfaces: Design and Analysis 1987, Marcel Dekker, New York. 5th ed.
26. Kiran R.V., Balomajumder C. Simultaneous adsorptive removal of cyanide and phenol from industrial wastewater: optimization of process parameters. Res J Chem Sci 2011, 1:30-39.
27. Banat F., Sameer A.A., Leema A.M. Chem Eng Technol 2004, 27:80.
28. Annadurai G., Juang R.S., Lee D.J. Factorial design analysis of adsorption of activated carbon on activated carbon incorporated with calcium alginate. Adv Environ Res 2002, 6:191.