Schooling, childhood poverty and international development: Choices and challenges in a longitudinal study

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-29

  Boyden, Jo ^a   James, Zoe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cohort; cross country; ethics; household survey; longitudinal; methodology; mixed methods; school survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895903793     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2013.873524     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alderman, H., Behrman, J. R., Kohler, H. P., Maluccio, J. A., & Watkins, S. C. (2000). Attrition in longitudinal household survey data: Some tests for three developing-country samples (FCND Discussion Paper No. 96). Washington, DC: IFPRI.
2. Barnett, I., Ariana, P., Petrou, S., Penny, M., Duc, Le Thuc, Galab, S., Woldehanna, T., Escobal, J., Plugge, E., & Boyden, J. (2013). Cohort profile: The Young Lives study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 701-708.
3. Brookings. (2011). A global compact on learning: Taking action on education in developing countries. Washington, DC: Centre for Universal Education at Brookings.
4. Bynner, J. (2005). Longitudinal cohort designs. In L. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of social measurement. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
5. Bynner, J., & Joshi, H. (2007). Building the evidence base from longitudinal data. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20, 159-179.
6. Crivello, G., Morrow, V., & Wilson, E. (2013). Young Lives longitudinal qualitative research: A guide for researchers (Young Lives Technical Note 26). Oxford: Young Lives.
7. Cueto, S., & Leon, J. (2012). Psychometric characteristics of cognitive development and achievement instruments in round 3 of Young Lives (Young Lives Technical Note 25). Oxford: Young Lives.
8. Cueto, S., Leon, J., Guerrero, G., & Munox, I. (2009). Psychometric characteristics of cognitive development and achievement instruments in Round 2 of Young Lives (Young Lives Technical Note 15). Oxford: Young Lives.
9. Dearden, K., Crookston, B., Madanat, H., West, J., Penny, M., & Cueto, S. (2013). What difference can fathers make? Early paternal absence compromises Peruvian children's growth. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 9, 143-154.
10. Dercon, S. (2011). Understanding child poverty in developing countries: Measurement and analysis. In J. Boyden, & M. Bourdillon (Eds.), Childhood poverty: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 52-72). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Dercon, S., & Singh, A. (2013). From nutrition to aspirations and self-efficacy: Gender bias over time among children in four countries. World Development, 45, 31-50.
12. Department for International Development (DFID). (2010). Learning for All: DFID's Education Strategy 2010-2015. London: DFID.
13. Escobal, J., & Flores, E. (2008). An assessment of the Young Lives sampling approach in Peru (Young Lives Technical Note No. 3). Oxford: Young Lives.
14. Frost, M., & Little, A. (2014). Children's learning practices in Ethiopia: Observations from primary school classes. Oxford Review of Education, 40.
15. Glewwe, P., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010 (NBER Working Paper No. 17554). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
16. Guerrero, G., León, J., Rosales, E., Zapata, M., Freire, S., Saldarriaga, V., & Cueto, S. (2012). Young Lives school survey in Peru: Design and initial findings (Young Lives Working Paper 92). Oxford: Young Lives.
17. Hill, Z. (2004). Reducing attrition in panel studies in developing countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 493-498.
18. James, Z., & Woodhead, M. (2014). Choosing and changing schools in India's private and government sectors: Young Lives evidence from Andhra Pradesh. Oxford Review of Education, 40.
19. Krutikova, S., Rolleston, C., & Aurino, E. (forthcoming, 2014). Does school make a difference and for whom? A two-country study of the impact of school quality on educational attainment. In J. Boyden, & M. Bourdillon (Eds.), Growing up in poverty: Findings from Young Lives. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
20. Kumra, N. (2008). An assessment of the Young Lives sampling approach in Andhra Pradesh, India (Young Lives Technical Note No. 2). Oxford: Young Lives.
21. Lewin, K. (2007). Improving access, equity and transitions in education: Creating a research agenda. CREATE Pathways to Access Monographs, 1.
22. Morrow, V. (2009). The ethics of social research with children and families in Young Lives: Practical experiences (Working Paper No. 53). Oxford: Young Lives.
23. Morrow, V., & Boyden, J. (2013). The ethics of researching children's well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, I. Frones, F. Casas, & J. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
24. Murray, H. (2012). Is school education breaking the cycle of poverty for children? Factors shaping education inequalities in Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam (Young Lives Policy Paper 6). Oxford: Young Lives.
25. Nguyen, N. P. (2008). An assessment of the Young Lives sampling approach in Vietnam (Young Lives Technical Note No. 4). Oxford: Young Lives.
26. Outes-Leon, I., & Dercon, S. (2008). Survey attrition and attrition bias in Young Lives (Young Lives Technical Note No. 5). Oxford: Young Lives.
27. Outes-Leon, I., & Porter, C. (2013). Catching up from early nutritional deficits? Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Economics and Human Biology, 11, 148-163.
28. Outes-Leon, I., & Sanchez, A. (2008). An assessment of the Young Lives sampling approach in Ethiopia (Young Lives Technical Note No. 1). Oxford: Young Lives.
29. Penny, M., Ore, B., & Madrid, S. (2012). Selection and induction of supervisors for fieldwork. (Young Lives Technical Note No. 24). Oxford: Young Lives.
30. Porter, C., Sanchez, A., & Nair, M. (2012). Surveying siblings: The case for tracking brothers and sisters of Young Lives index children in Round 4 and beyond (Young Lives Technical Note No. 23). Oxford: Young Lives.
31. Rolleston, C., James, Z., & Aurino, E. (2013a). Exploring the effect of educational opportunity and inequality on learning outcomes in Ethiopia, Peru, India and Vietnam. (Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2013). Paris: UNESCO.
32. Rolleston, C., James, Z., Pasquier-Doumer, L., Tam, Tran Ngo Thi Minh, & Duc, Le Thuc. (2013b). Making progress (Report of the Young Lives School Survey in Vietnam). Oxford: Young Lives.
33. Save the Children. (2003). Child protection policy. London: International Save the Children Alliance.
34. Singh, A. (2013). Size and sources of the Private School Premium in test scores in India (Young Lives Working Paper, No. 98). Oxford: Young Lives.
35. UNESCO. (2005). The quality imperative (Education for All Global Monitoring Report). Paris: UNESCO.
36. Wilson, I., Huttly, S. R. A., & Fenn, B. (2006). A case study of sample design for longitudinal research: Young Lives. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 351-365.
37. Woodhead, M., Murray, H., & Dornan, P. (2013a). What inequality means for children. Evidence from Young Lives. Oxford: Young Lives.
38. Woodhead, M., Frost, M., & James, Z. (2013b). Does growth in private schooling contribute to education for all? Evidence from a longitudinal, two-cohort study in Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Educational Development, 33, 65-73.