Anne-Wil Harzing: The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 339-342

  Bensman, Stephen J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895900349     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0388-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic ranking. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72-95.
2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index - A comparison of WoS, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.
3. Bensman, S. J. (2007a). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93-155.
4. Bensman, S.J. (2007b). Garfield and the Impact Factor: The creation, utilization, and validation of a citation measure: Part 2, The probabilistic, statistical, and sociological bases of the measure. Baton Rouge: Unpublished. Available on the Web site of Dr. Eugene Garfield at the following URL: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/bensman/bensmanegif22007.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2011.
5. Bensman, S. J. (2008). Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1097-1117.
6. Bensman, S. J., Smolinsky, L. J., & Pudovkin, A. I. (2010). Mean citation rate per article in mathematics journals: Differences from the scientific model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1440-1463.
7. Burright, M. (2006). Google scholar-science and technology. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Winter, 1-4.
8. Dixon, L., et al. (2010). Finding articles and journals via Google Scholar, journal portals, and link resolvers: Usability study results. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 50(2), 170-181.
9. Harzing, A.-W., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 61-73.
10. Jacsó, P. (2009a). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1468-4527.
11. Jacsó, P. (2009b). Google Scholar's ghost authors. Library Journal, 134(18), 26-27.
12. London School of Economics and Political Science. (2011). Impact of the social sciences: Maximizing the impact of academic research. Available online at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/. Accessed 28 March 2011.
13. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.
14. van Raan, T. (2010). Measure for measure. Nature, 468(7325), 763.