Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 833-849

  Allum, Nick ^a   Sibley, Elissa ^a   Sturgis, Patrick ^b   Stoneman, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

attitudes; genetic and reproductive technologies; genetic testing; religion; scientific literacy

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL GENETICS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; RELIGION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; GENETIC TESTING; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; RELIGION AND SCIENCE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84895881922     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662513492485     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alikani M.The debate surrounding human embryonic stem cell research in the USA.Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007;15 (S2): 7-11
2. Allport GWThe Individual and his Religion: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Macmillan; 1950:
3. Allport GW,Ross JM.Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967;5 (4): 432-443
4. Allum N,Sturgis P,Brunton–Smith I,Tabourazi D.Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta–analysis.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17 (1): 35-54
5. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. AAPOR; 2011:
6. Bauer MW,Allum N,Miller S.What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (1): 79-95
7. Bodmer WThe Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society; 1985:
8. Botoseneanu A,Alexander JA,Banaszak–Holl J.To test or not to test? The role of attitudes, knowledge, and religious involvement among US adults on intent–to–obtain adult genetic testing.Health Education & Behavior. 2011;38 (6): 617-628
9. Brossard D,Nisbet MC.Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2007;19 (1): 24-52
10. Brossard D,Scheufele DA,Kim E,Lewenstein BV.Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18 (5): 546-558
11. Butt S,Clery E,Abeywardana V,Phillips MWellcome Trust Monitor 1: Survey Report. London: Wellcome Trust; 2009:
12. Doolin B,Motion J.Christian lay understandings of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (6): 669-685
13. Durant JBiotechnology in Public. London: Science Museum; 1992:
14. Ehrich K,Williams C,Farsides B.The embryo as moral work object: PGD/IVF staff views and experiences.Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008;30 (5): 772-787
15. Evans G,Durant J.The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain.Public Understanding of Science. 1995;4 (1): 57-74
16. Evans JH.Religious belief, perceptions of human suffering, and support for reproductive genetic technology.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2006;31 (6): 1047-1074
17. Evans JH,Hudson K.Religion and reproductive genetics: Beyond views of embryonic life?.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2007;46 (4): 565-581
18. Feng LR,Maguire–Zeiss KA.Gene therapy in Parkinson’s disease: Rationale and current status.CNS Drugs. 2010;24 (3): 177-192
19. Gaskell G,Stares S,Allansdottir A,Allum N,Castro P,Esmer Y,Fischler C,Jackson J,Kronberger N,Hampel J,Mejlgaard N,Quintanilha A,Rammer A,Revuelta G,Stoneman P,Torgersen H,Wagner W.Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of Change?. 2010;:
20. Gaskell G,Allansdottir A,Allum N,Castro P,Esmer Y,Fischler C,Jackson J,Kronberger N,Hampel J,Mejlgaard N,Quintanilha A,Rammer A,Revuelta G,Stares S,Torgersen H,Wagner W.The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences.Nature Biotechnology. 2011;29:113-114
21. Harrison ESocial Measurement through Social Surveys: An Applied Approach. Bulmer MGibbs JHyman L, ed. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010:89-108.
22. Ho SS,Brossard D,Scheufele DA.Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2008;20 (2): 171-192
23. Hudson K,Scott J,Faden RValues in Conflict: Public Attitudes on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington DC: Genetics & Public Policy Center; 2005:
24. Public Attitudes to Science 2011: Literature Review. Ipsos–MORI Social Research Institute; 2011:
25. Kahan DHandbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk. Roeser SHillerbrand RSandin PPeterson M, ed. London: Springer; 2012:725-760.
26. Kahan D,Braman D,Slovic P,Gastil J,Cohen G.The future of nanotechnology risk perceptions: An experimental investigation of two hypotheses.Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 2008;:08-24
27. Loewenthal KM,MacLeod AK,Cinnirella M.Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among different religious groups in the UK.Personality and Individual Differences. 2002;32 (1): 133-139
28. Lynch J.Stem cells and the embryo: Biorhetoric and scientism in Congressional debate.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18 (3): 309-324
29. McAndrew S,Voas D.Measuring religiosity using surveys.Survey Question Bank: Topic Overview 4. 2011;:
30. MooneyC (2011) The science of why we don’t believe science. Available at: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/denial–science–chris–mooney?page=129/09/2011
31. Science and Engineering Indicators – 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2008:
32. Science and Engineering Indicators – 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2010:
33. Nisbet MC.The competition for worldviews: Values, information, and public support for stem cell research.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2005;17 (1): 90-112
34. Nisbet MC,Goidel RK.Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: Bridging the ethnographic–survey research divide.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (4): 421-440
35. Nisbet MC,Mooney C.Framing science.Science. 2007;316:56
36. Pardo R,Calvo F.Attitudes toward embryo research, worldviews, and the moral status of the embryo frame.Science Communication. 2008;30 (1): 8-47
37. Parens E,Knowles LP.Reprogenetics and public policy: Reflections and recommendations.The Hastings Center Report. 2003;33 (4): S1-S24
38. Popkin JThe Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:
39. Priest SH,Bonfadelli H,Rusanen M.The ‘trust gap’ hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors.Risk Analysis. 2003;23 (4): 751-766
40. Simon RM.Gender differences in knowledge and attitude towards biotechnology.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19 (6): 642-653
41. Singer E,Corning AD,Antonucci T.Attitudes toward genetic testing and fetal diagnosis, 1990–1996.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1999;40 (4): 429-445
42. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (2011) Human life and dignity. Available at (accessed 29 September 2011): http://www.usccb.org/issues–and–action/human–life–and–dignity/
43. Voas D.The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe.European Sociological Review. 2009;25 (2): 155-168
44. Whitmarsh L.Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time.Global Environmental Change. 2011;21 (2): 690-700