The Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment: Current structure and practices

Educational Interpreting: How It Can Succeed

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 186-205

  Schick, Brenda ^a   Williams, Kevin T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895839497     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Bornstein, H., ed. 1990. Manual communication: Implications for education. Washington D. C.: Gallaudet University Press.
2. Commission on the Education of the Deaf. 1988. Toward equality: Education of the Deaf. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
3. Fernald, A. 1989. Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development 60(6):1497-1510.
4. Fernald, A., and G. McRoberts. 1996. Prosodic bootstrapping: A critical analysis of the argument and the evidence. In Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, ed. J. L. Morgan and K. Demuth, 365-88. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
5. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U. S. Code, Ch. 33, Secs. 1400-1491, Pub. L. 10517, 1997.
6. Johnson, R. E., S. K. Liddell, and C. J. Erting. 1989. Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3. Washington, D. C.: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
7. Kantor, R. 1982. Communicative interaction: Mother modification and child acquisition of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 36:233-82.
8. Kemler-Nelson, D. G., K. Hirsh-Pasek, P. W. Jusczyk, and K. Wright-Cassidy. 1989. How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. Journal of Child Language 16(1):55-68.
9. Lucas, C., and C. Valli. 1989. Language contact in the American deaf community. In The sociolinguistics of the deaf community, ed. C. Lucas, 11-40. San Diego: Academic Press.
10. Masataka, N. 1992. Motherese in a signed language. Infant Behavior and Development 15(4):453-60.
11. Mitchell, M. K. 2002. Statewide training of educational interpreters: How is this possible? In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, 83-117. Alexandria, Va.: RID Publications.
12. Moore, D. S., M. J. Spence, and G. S. Katz. 1997. Six-month-olds' categorization of natural infant-directed utterances. Developmental Psychology 33:980-89.
13. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
14. Reilly, J. S., and U. Bellugi. 1996. Competition on the face: Affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23:219-36.
15. Schick, B. 1997. The effects of discourse genre on language complexity in school-aged deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2:234-51.
16. Schick, B., L. Johnson, and K. Williams. 2004. Look who's being left behind: Deaf children with interpreters in the public schools. Paper presented at the Office of Education Personnel Preparation Conference, 24 April, Washington, D. C.
17. Schick, B., and K. T. Williams. 1992. The educational interpreter performance assessment: A tool to evaluate classroom performance. Paper presented at the conference on Issues in Language and Deafness: The Use of Sign Language in Educational Settings: Current Concepts and Controversies, Omaha, Nebraska.
18. Schick, B., K. Williams, and L. Bolster. 2000. Skill levels of educational interpreters working in the public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 4:144-55.
19. Supalla, S. 1992. Equality in educational opportunities: The deaf version. In A free hand: Enfranchising the education of deaf children, eds. M. Walworth, D. F. Moores, and T. J. O'Rourke, 170-81. Silver Spring, Md.: T. J. Publishers.
20. Woodward, J., and T. Allen. 1988. Classroom use of artificial Manual English sign systems by teachers. Sign Language Studies 55:60.