Detecting and visualizing cell phenotype differences from microscopy images using transportbased morphometry

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 3448-3453

  Basu, Saurav ^a   Kolouri, Soheil ^a   Rohde, Gustavo K ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell morphometry; High content screening; Optimal transport

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL POPULATION; CHROMATIN; HEPATOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LIVER CELL; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOMETRICS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CELL MORPHOMETRY; HIGH CONTENT SCREENING; OPTIMAL TRANSPORT;

ALGORITHMS; CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PHENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84895820065     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319779111     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anonymous (2012) The quest for quantitative microscopy. Nat Methods 9(7):627.
2. Yang L, et al. (2009) Virtual microscopy and grid-enabled decision support for largescale analysis of imaged pathology specimens. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 13(4):636-644.
3. Bartels PH, Gahm T, Thompson D (1997) Automated microscopy in diagnostic histopathology: From image processing to automated reasoning. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 8(2):214-223.
4. Demir C, Yener B (2005) Automated cancer diagnosis based on histopathological images: A systematic survey. Technical Report TR-05-09 (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY).
5. Rodenacker K, Bengtsson E (2003) A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Anal Cell Pathol 25(1):1-36.
6. Wang W, Slepcev D, Basu S, Ozolek JA, Rohde GK (2013) A linear optimal transportation framework for quantifying and visualizing variations in sets of images. Int J Comput Vis 101(2):254-269.
7. Wang W, et al. (2011) An optimal transportation approach for nuclear structurebased pathology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(3):621-631.
8. Wang W, Mo Y, Ozolek JA, Rohde GK (2011) Penalized fisher discriminant analysis and its application to image-based morphometry. Pattern Recognit Lett 32(15): 2128-2135.
9. Kolouri S, Basu S, Rohde GK (2014) Software/Data. Available at http://www.andrew. cmu.edu/user/gustavor/software.html. Accessed February 4, 2014.
10. Wang W, Ozolek JA, Rohde GK (2010) Detection and classification of thyroid follicular lesions based on nuclear structure from histopathology images. Cytometry A 77(5):485-494.
11. Carpenter AE, et al. (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7(10):R100.
12. Anderson TW (1963) Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. Ann Math Stat 34(1):122-148.
13. Ljosa V, Sokolnicki KL, Carpenter AE (2012) Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation. Nat Methods 9(7):637.
14. Thermo Scientific (2008) Instructions for the BioImage FKHR Redistribution Assay for High-Content Analysis, product no. R04-008-01 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA).
15. Zink D, Fischer AH, Nickerson JA (2004) Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 4(9):677-687.
16. Turk MA, Pentland AP (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1991 (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA), pp 586-591.
17. Rohde GK, Ribeiro AJS, Dahl KN, Murphy RF (2008) Deformation-based nuclear morphometry: Capturing nuclear shape variation in HeLa cells. Cytometry A 73(4): 341-350.
18. Boddy R, Smith G (2009) Nonâ Parametric Statistics, Statistical Methods in Practice: For Scientists and Technologists (Wiley, New York), pp 129-138.