Reliability of telephone assessments of at-risk criteria of psychosis: A comparison to face-to-face interviews

Schizophrenia Research

Volumn 153, Issue 1-3, 2014, Pages 251-253

  Michel, Chantal ^a   Schimmelmann, Benno G ^a   Kupferschmid, Stephan ^a   Siegwart, Marcel ^a   Schultze Lutter, Frauke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FACE TO FACE INTERVIEW; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOSIS; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TELEPHONE;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84895811556     PISSN: 09209964     EISSN: 15732509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.025     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Crippa J.A., de Lima Osório F., Del-Ben C.M., Filho A.S., da Silva Freitas M.C., Loureiro S.R. Comparability between telephone and face-to-face structured clinical interview for DSM-IV in assessing social anxiety disorder. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 2008, 44(4):241-247.
2. Fusar-Poli P., Borgwardt S., Bechdolf A., Addington J., Riecher-Rössler A., Schultze-Lutter F., Keshavan M., Wood S., Ruhrmann S., Seidman L.J., Valmaggia L., Cannon T., Velthorst E., De Haan L., Cornblatt B., Bonoldi I., Birchwood M., McGlashan T., Carpenter W., McGorry P., Klosterkötter J., McGuire P., Yung A. The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70(1):107-120.
3. Fux L., Walger P., Schimmelmann B.G., Schultze-Lutter F. The Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, child and youth version (SPI-CY): practicability and discriminative validity. Schizophr. Res. 2013, 146(1-3):69-78.
4. Hajebi A., Motevalian A., Amin-Esmaeili M., Hefazi M., Radgoodarzi R., Rahimi-Movaghar A., Sharifi V. Telephone versus face-to-face administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, for diagnosis of psychotic disorders. Compr. Psychiatry 2012, 53(5):579-583.
5. McGlashan T.H., Walsh B., Woods S. The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome. Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-up 2010, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Nelson B., Yuen H.P., Wood S.J., Linn A., Spiliotacopoulos D., Bruxner A., Broussard C., Simmons M., Foley D.L., Brewer W.J., Francey S.M., Amminger P., Thompson A., McGorry P.D., Yung A.R. Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk ("prodromal") for psychosis, the PACE 400 Study. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 70(8):793-802.
7. Rohde P., Lewinsohn P.M., Seeley J.R. Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing axis I and II disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 1997, 154(11):1593-1598.
8. Schultze-Lutter F., Addington J., Ruhrmann S., Klosterkötter J. Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult Version (SPI-A) 2007, s.l.r, Roma. G. Fioriti (Ed.).
9. Schultze-Lutter F., Marshall M., Koch E. Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Child and Youth Version; Extended English Translation (SPI-CY EET) 2012, s.l.r, Roma. G. Fioriti (Ed.).
10. Woods S.W., Addington J., Cadenhead K.S., Cannon T.D., Cornblatt B.A., Heinssen R., Perkins D.O., Seidman L.J., Tsuang M.T., Walker E.F., McGlashan T.H. Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Schizophr. Bull. 2009, 35(5):894-908.