First look at changes in flood hazard in the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project ensemble

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 3257-3261

  Dankers, Rutger ^a   Arnell, Nigel W ^b   Clark, Douglas B ^c   Falloon, Pete D ^a   Fekete, Balázs M ^d   Gosling, Simon N ^e   Heinke, Jens ^f,g   Kim, Hyungjun ^h   Masaki, Yoshimitsu ⁱ   Satoh, Yusuke ^j   Stacke, Tobias ^k   Wada, Yoshihide ^l   Wisser, Dominik ^m,n  

^a MET OFFICE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^d City University of New York   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^f POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^g INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

^h INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^k MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^l UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Climate impacts; Extremes; River flows

Indexed keywords

SNOW;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FLOODING; GREENHOUSE GAS; HAZARD; HYDROLOGY; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIVER; RIVER BASIN; SIMULATION; SPRING;

CLIMATE IMPACTS; EXTREMES; RIVER FLOWS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOODS; FORECASTING; HYDRODYNAMICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RIVERS;

EID: 84895794618     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302078110     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Meehl GA, et al. (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Solomon S, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2012) Managing The Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Field CB, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
3. Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419(6903):224-232.
4. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19(21):5686-5699.
5. Min SK, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470(7334):378-381.
6. Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S, Emori S, Oki T, Kimoto M (2008) Global projections of changing risks of floods and droughts in a changing climate. Hydrol Sci J 53(4): 754-772.
7. Dankers R, Feyen L (2008) Climate change impact on flood hazard in Europe: An assessment based on high-resolution climate simulations. J Geophys Res 113:D19105.
8. Dankers R, Feyen L (2009) Flood hazard in Europe in an ensemble of regional climate scenarios. J Geophys Res 114:D16108.
9. Okazaki A, et al. (2012) Changes in flood risk under global warming estimated using MIROC5 and the Discharge Probability Index. J Meteorol Soc Japan Ser II 90(4):509-524.
10. te Linde AH, Aerts JCJH, Bakker AMR, Kwadijk JCJ (2010) Simulating low-probability peak discharges for the Rhine basin using resampled climate modeling data. Water Resour Res 46(3):W03512.
11. Veijalainen N, Lotsari E, Alho P, Vehviläinen B, Käyhkö J (2010) National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland. J Hydrol (Amst) 391(3-4):333-350.
12. Kay AL, Jones DA (2012) Transient changes in flood frequency and timing in Britain under potential projections of climate change. Int J Climatol 32(4):489-502.
13. Huang S, Hattermann F, Krysanova V, Bronstert A (2013) Projections of climate change impacts on river flood conditions in Germany by combining three different RCMs with a regional eco-hydrological model. Clim Change 116(3-4):631-663.
14. Warszawski L, et al. (2014) Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): Project framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3228-3232.
15. Svensson C, Hannaford J, Kundzewicz ZW, Marsh TJ (2006) Trends in River Floods:Why Is There No Clear Signal in Observations? IAHS-AISH Publication, eds Tchiguirinskaia J, Thein KNN, Hubert P (International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, UK), Vol 305, pp 1-18.
16. Petrow T, Merz B (2009) Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951-2002. J Hydrol (Amst) 371(1-4):129-141.
17. Wada Y, et al. (2013) Multi-model projections and uncertainties of irrigation water demand under climate change. Geophys Res Lett, 10.1002/grl.50686.
18. Schewe J, et al. (2014) Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3245-3250.
19. Haddeland I, et al. (2011) Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: Setup and first results. J Hydrometeorol 12(5):869-884.
20. Ehret U, Zehe E, Wulfmeyer V, Warrach-Sagi K, Liebert J (2012) HESS Opinions "Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?" Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3391-3404.
21. Hagemann S, et al. (2011) Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models. J Hydrometeorol 12(4):556-578.
22. Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S (2009) First estimate of the future global population at risk of flooding. Hydrol Res Lett 3:6-9.
23. te Linde AH, Bubeck P, Dekkers JEC, de Moel H, Aerts JCJH (2011) Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(2):459-473.
24. Feyen L, Dankers R, Bódis K, Salamon P, Barredo J (2012) Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates. Clim Change 112(1):47-62.
25. Mathison C, et al. (2012) Regional projections of North Indian climate for adaptation studies. Sci Total Environ, 10.1175/2011JHM1388.1.
26. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485-498.
27. Moss RH, et al. (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747-756.
28. Weedon GP, et al. (2011) Creation of the WATCH forcing data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century. J Hydrometeorol 12(5):823-848.
29. Hempel S, Frieler K, Warszawski L, Schewe J, Piontek F (2013) A trend-preserving bias correction-the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst Dynam 4:219-236.
30. Rojas R, Feyen L, Dosio A, Bavera D (2011) Improving pan-European hydrological simulation of extreme events through statistical bias correction of RCM-driven climate simulations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(8):2599-2620.
31. Coles S (2001) An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, London).
32. Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25(8-12):1287-1304.