A meta-analysis of randomized trials for repeat revascularization following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 878-880

  Takagi, Hisato ^a   Mizuno, Yusuke ^a   Niwa, Masao ^a   Goto, Shin Nosuke ^a   Umemoto, Takuya ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Off Pump coronary artery bypass grafting; Randomized controlled trial; Repeat revascularization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; ON PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPEAT PROCEDURE; REPEAT REVASCULARIZATION RATE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; REPEAT REVASCULARIZATION; REVIEW; RISK; RISK FACTOR;

META-ANALYSIS; OFF-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPEAT REVASCULARIZATION;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84895793475     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt316     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, Rao V, Borger MA, Karkouti K et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:872-82.
2. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ; Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;102:188-203.
3. Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, Edmonds L, Rosengard BR. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:1409-13.
4. Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2601-16.
5. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Polvani G, Agrifoglio M, Chen YB, Kassem S et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with onpump coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80: 2121-5.
6. Takagi H, Tanabashi T, Kawai N, Kato T, Umemoto T. Off-pump coronary artery bypass sacrifices graft patency: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:e2-e3.
7. Feng ZZ, Shi J, Zhao XW, Xu ZF. Meta-analysis of on-pump and off-pump coronary arterial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:757-65.