Renal tumour invasion index as a novel anatomical classification predicting urological complications after partial nephrectomy

Scandinavian Journal of Urology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 41-51

  Nisen, Harry ^a   Ruutu, Mirja ^a   Glücker, Esko ^b   Visapää, Harri ^a   Taari, Kimmo ^a,c  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b Porvoo Hospital   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anatomical classification; Complications; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE POSITIVE MARGIN; KIDNEY THROMBOSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIRENAL COLLECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE FEVER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RENAL ARTERIAL DISSECTION; RENAL ARTERIAL THROMBOSIS; RENAL TUMOR INVASION INDEX; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; THICKNESS; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; URETER LESION; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; URINARY TRACT HEMORRHAGE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINE RETENTION;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UROLOGIC DISEASES;

EID: 84895490698     PISSN: 21681805     EISSN: 21681813     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2013.797491     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;59:543-52.
2. Medina-Polo J, Romero-Otero J, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Dominguez-Esteban M, Passas-Martinez J, Villacampa- Auba F, et al. Can partial nephrectomy preserve renal function and modify survival in comparison with radical nephrectomy? Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011;45:143-50.
3. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:735-40.
4. Suer E, Burgu B, Gokce MI, Turkolmez K, Beduk Y, Baltaci S. Comparison of radical and partial nephrectomy in terms of renal function: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011;45:24-9.
5. Klarenbach S, Moore RB, Chapman DW, Dong J, Braam B. Adverse renal outcomes in subjects undergoing nephrectomy for renal tumors: a population-based analysis. Eur Urol 2011; 59:333-9.
6. Touijer K, Jacqmin D, Kavoussi LR, Montorsi F, Patard JJ, Rogers CG, et al. The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol 2010;57:214-22.
7. Ljungberg B, Covan N, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma 2012. Available from www.urowb.org/gls/pdf/NEW09-Renal-Cell-Carcinoma- LR.pdf.
8. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;51:1606-15.
9. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786-93.
10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The RENAL nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-53.
11. Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, Park CH, Gill IS. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol 2010;183:1708-13.
12. Waldert M, Waalkes S, Klatte T, Kuczyk MA, Weibl P, Schuller G, et al. External validation of the preoperative anatomical classification for prediction of complications related to nephron-sparing surgery. World J Urol 2010;28: 531-5.
13. Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, Axwijk PH, Can C, Horenblas S, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the RENAL nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011;186: 42-6.
14. Volpe A, Terrone C. Anatomic classification systems of renal tumors: new, useful tools in renal surgical oncology. Eur Urol 2011;60:731-3.
15. Simmons MN, Gill IS. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. J Urol 2007;177:2067-73.
16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
17. Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, et al. Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 2012;61:593-9.
18. Graefen M. The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications. Eur Urol 2010;57:387-9.
19. Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, Buffi N, Lee R, Cestari A, et al. Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2012;61:395-402.
20. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, Canter DJ, Li T, Kutikov A, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2011;60:724-30.
21. Simmons MN. Morphometric characterization of kidney tumors. Curr Opin Urol 2011;21:99-103.