Identifying non-elliptical entity mentions in a coordinated NP with ellipses

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 47, Issue , 2014, Pages 139-152

  Chae, Jeongmin ^a   Jung, Younghee ^a   Lee, Taemin ^a   Jung, Soonyoung ^a   Huh, Chan ^a   Kim, Gilhan ^a   Kim, Hyeoncheol ^a   Oh, Heungbum ^b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ellipsis resolution; Named entity recognition; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; GEOMETRY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING;

BIOMEDICAL DOMAIN; GENIA CORPUS; LINGUISTIC RULES; NAMED ENTITIES; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; NOUN PHRASE; REALISTIC CONDITIONS; TEXT MINING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 3;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BOOK; DNA BINDING; ELLIPSES; GENE PRODUCT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MONOCYTE; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; NOUN PHRASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RECALL; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ELLIPSIS RESOLUTION; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; TEXT MINING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SOFTWARE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84895484578     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tanabe L., Wilbur W.J. Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical text. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(8):1124-1132.
2. Dale R, Mazur P. Handling conjunctions in named entities. In: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing, vol. 4394; 2007. p. 131-42.
3. Buyko E, Tomanek K, Hahn U. Resolution of coordination ellipses in biological named entities using conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference of the Pacific association for computational linguistics; 2007. p. 163-71.
4. Agrawal R, Srikant R. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proc 20th int conf very large data bases, VLDB, vol. 1215; 1994. p. 487-99.
5. Kim J.D., Ohta T., Tateisi Y., Tsujii J. Genia corpus-a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl. 1):180-182.
6. Bada M., Eckert M., Evans D., Garcia K., Shipley K., Sitnikov D., et al. Concept annotation in the craft corpus. BMC Bioinform 2012, 13(1):1-20.
7. Verspoor K., Cohen K., Lanfranchi A., Warner C., Johnson H., Roeder C., et al. A corpus of full-text journal articles is a robust evaluation tool for revealing differences in performance of biomedical natural language processing tools. BMC Bioinform 2012, 13(1):1-26.
8. De Beaugrande R., Dressler W. Introduction to text linguistics 1981, Longman, London.
9. Agarwal R, Boggess L. A simple but useful approach to conjunct identification. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics; 1992. p. 15-21.
10. Okumura A, Muraki K. Symmetric pattern matching analysis for English coordinate structures. In: Proceedings of the fourth conference on applied natural language processing; 1994. p. 41-6.
11. Goldberg M. An unsupervised model for statistically determining coordinate phrase attachment. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics on computational linguistics; 1999. p. 610-14.
12. Chantree F, Kilgarriff A, Roeck AD, Willis A. Disambiguating coordinations using word distribution information. In: Proceedings of recent advances in natural language processing; 2005. p. 21-23.
13. Ogren PV. Improving syntactic coordination resolution using language modeling. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 student research workshop, HLT-SRWS '10, association for computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA; 2010. p. 1-6.
14. Ogren PV. Coordination resolution in biomedical texts. PhD thesis, Boulder, CO, USA, aAI3453768; 2011.
15. Tateisi Y, Yakushiji A, Ohta T, Tsujii J. Syntax Annotation for the GENIA corpus. In: Proceedings of the IJCNLP 2005, companion volume, vol. Companion, Jeju Island, Korea; 2005.
16. Bies A, Kulick S, Mandel M. Parallel entity and treebank annotation. In: Proceedings of the workshop on frontiers in corpus annotations II: pie in the sky, CorpusAnno '05, Association for computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA; 2005. p. 21-28.
17. Finkel J., Dingare S., Manning C.D., Nissim M., Alex B., Grover C. Exploring the boundaries: gene and protein identification in biomedical text. BMC Bioinform 2005, 6(Suppl. 1):S5.
18. Lafferty J, McCallum A, Pereira FCN. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on machine learning; 2001. p. 282-9.
19. Cohen K.B., Verspoor K., Johnson H.L., Roeder C., Ogren P.V., Baumgartner W.A., et al. High-precision biological event extraction: effects of system and of data. Comput Intell 2011, 27(4):681-701.
20. Lindberg D.A., Humphreys B.L., McCray A.T. The unified medical language system. Methods Inf Med 1993, 32(4):281-291.
21. Maglott D., Ostell J., Pruitt K.D., Tatusova T. Entrez gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(Suppl. 1):D54-D58.
22. Bairoch A., Apweiler R., Wu C.H., Barker W.C., Boeckmann B., Ferro S., et al. The universal protein resource (uniprot). Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(suppl 1):D154-D159.
23. Maier W, Hinrichs E, Kübler S, Krivanek J. Annotating coordination in the PENN Treebank. In: Proceedings of the sixth linguistic annotation workshop, LAW VI '12, association for computational linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA; 2012. p. 166-74.
24. Chae J., Jung Y., Lee T., Chae J., Oh H., Jung S. The partial matching method for effective recognizing HLA entities. J Korean Assoc Comput Educ 2011, 14(2):83-94.