Can ultrasound common bile duct diameter predict common bile duct stones in the setting of acute cholecystitis?

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 207, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 432-435

  Boys, Joshua A ^a   Doorly, Michael G ^a   Zehetner, Joerg ^a   Dhanireddy, Kiran K ^a   Senagore, Anthony J ^a,b  

^a UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Central Michigan University College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute cholecystitis; Choledocholithiasis; Common bile duct diameter; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; ULTRASOUND; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT DIAMETER; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLECYSTITIS, ACUTE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895452806     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: 18791883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. A. Yip, and K.H. Lam An evaluation of routine operative cholangiography Aust N Z J Surg 58 1988 391 395
2. I. Faris, J.P. Thomson, and D.J. Grundy et al. Operative cholangiography: a reappraisal based on a review of 400 cholangiograms Br J Surg 62 1975 966 972
3. T.H. Liu, E.T. Consorti, and A. Kawashima et al. Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy Ann Surg 234 2001 33 40
4. P. Paolo, P. Nicoletta, and M. Carla et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of choledocholithiasis Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 61 1990 213 218
5. B.A. Abboud, P.F. Malet, and J.A. Berlin et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis Gastrointest Endosc 44 1996 450
6. K.P. Koo, and R.C. Thirlby Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. What is the optimal timing for operation? Arch Surg 131 1996 540 544 discussion, 544-5
7. V.V. Grubnik, A.I. Tkachenko, and V.V. Ilyashenko et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus open surgery: comparative prospective randomized trial Surg Endosc 26 2012 2165 2171
8. D.J. Martin, D.R. Vernon, and J. Toouli Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2 2006 CD003327
9. N. Alexakis, and S. Connor Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones HPB (Oxford) 14 2012 254 259
10. L. Chang, S. Lo, and B.E. Stabile et al. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 231 2000 82 87
11. D.S. Watkin, D.J. Leaper, and J.M. Haworth et al. Assessment of the common bile duct before cholecystectomy using ultrasound and biochemical measurements: validation based on follow-up Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76 1994 317 319
12. F. Lacaine, M.B. Corlette, and H Bismuth Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones Arch Surg 115 1980 1114 1116