In vitro methods to predict skin irritation

Irritant Dermatitis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 501-508

  Chew, Ai Lean ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895356358     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31294-3_54     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82:377-389
2. Patrick E, Maibach HI. Comparison of the time course, dose response and mediators of chemically induced skin irritation in three species. In: Frosch PJ et al. (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1989; 399-403
3. Kastner W. Irritancy potential of cosmetic ingredients. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977; 28:741-754
4. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and Neutral Red absorption. Toxicol Lett 1985; 24:119-124
5. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assays. J Tissue Culture Methods 1984; 9:7-9
6. Bulich AA, Greene MW, Isenberg DL. Reliability of bacterial compounds and complex effluents. In: Branson DR, Dickson KL (eds) Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM 737.), Philadelphia, 1981; pp 338-347
7. Luepke NP, Kemper FH. The HET-CAM test: an alternative to the Draize eye test. Fundam Chem Toxicol 1986; 24:495-496
8. Parce JW, Owicki JC, Kercso KM et al. Detection of cellaffecting agents with silicon biosensor. Science 1989; 246:243-247
9. Silverman J. Preliminary findings on the use of protozoa (Tetrahymena thermophila) as models for ocular irritation testing rabbits. Lab Anim Sci 1983; 33:56-58
10. OECD. Guidelines for testing chemicals, Section 404, Acute dermal irritation/corrosion. OECD, Paris, 1981
11. OECD. Guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 404, Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion. OECD, Paris, 17 July 1992
12. Young JR, How MJ. Product classification as corrosive or irritant by measuring pH and acid/alkali reserve. In: Rougier A, Goldberg AM, Maibach HI (eds) In vitro skin toxicology: irritation, phototoxicity, sensitization. Mary Ann Liebert, New York, 1994
13. Morrison WL, McAuliffe DJ, Parrish JA, Bloch JJ. In vitro assay for phototoxic chemicals. J Invest Dermatol 1982; 78:460-463
14. Serban GP, Henry SM, Cotty VF et al. In vivo evaluation of skin lotions by electrical capacitance: I. The effect of several lotions on the progression of damage and healing after repeated insult with sodium laurel sulfate. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1981; 32:407-419
15. Gordon VC, Kelly CP, Bergman HC. Evaluation of SKINTEX, an in vitro method for determining dermal irritation. Toxicologist 1990; 10:78
16. Soto RJ, Servi MJ, Gordon VC. Evaluation of an alternative method for ocular irritation. In: Goldberg AM (ed) In vitro toxicology. Mary Ann Liebert, New York, 1989
17. Khaiat A. Evaluation of SKINTEX at Yves Rocher. Presented at 1st European In Vitro Symposium, Paris, June 1990
18. Food and Drug Safety Center Report. Presented at JSAAE, Tokyo, Japan, November 1990
19. Bason M, Gordon VC, Maibach H. Skin irritation in vitro assays. Int J Dermatol 30:623-626
20. Bason M, Harvell J, Gordon V, Maibach H. Evaluation of the SKINTEX system. Presented at the Irritant Contact Dermatitis Symposium, Groningen, Netherlands, 1991
21. Harvell J, Bason M, Gordon V, Maibach H. Evaluation of dermal irritation of pure chemicals. Presented at the In Vitro Workshop, FDA/AAPS Symposium, Washington, DC, December 2, 1991
22. Gordon VC, Acevedo J. SOLATEX-PI, An in vitro method to predict photoirritation. Presented at JSAAE, Japan, November 13, 1991
23. Ponec M. In vitro models to predict skin irritation. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996
24. Botham PA, Earl LK, Fentem JH et al. Alternative methods for skin irritation testing: the current status. ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 1
25. Van der Sandt JJM, van Schoonhoven J, Maas WJM et al. Skin organ culture as an alternative to in vivo dermatotoxicity testing. ATLA 1993; 21:443-449
26. Clothier RH, Hulme L, Ahmed AB, Reeves HL, Smith M, Balls M. In vitro cytotoxicity of 150 chemicals to 3T3-L1 cells, assessed by the FRAME Kenacid Blue method. ATLA 1988; 16:84-95
27. Borenfreund E, Babich H, Martin-Alguacil N. Comparisons of two in vitro cytotoxicity assays - the Neutral Red (NR) and tetrazolium MTT test. Toxicol In vitro 1988; 2:1-6
28. Chan KY. Chemical injury to an in vitro ocular system: differential release of plasminogen activator. Clin Eye Res 1986; 5:357-365
29. Jackson EM, Hume RD, Wallin RF. The agarose diffusion method for ocular irritancy screening: cosmetic products, Part II. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol 1988; 7:187-194
30. Nago S, Stroud JD, Hamada T et al. The effect of sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid on human epidermis: an EM study. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1972; 52:11-23
31. Kanerva L, Lauharanta J. Variable effects of irritants (methylmethacrylate, terphenyls, dithranol and methylglyoxalbisguanylhydrazone) on the fine structure of the epidermis. Arch Toxicol 1986; 9:455
32. Gibson WT, Teall MR. Interactions of C12 surfactants with the skin: changes in enzymes and visible and histological features of rat skin treated with sodium laurel sulfate. Fundam Chem Toxicol 1983; 21:587-593
33. SOT Position paper. Comments on the LD 50 and acute eye and skin irritation test. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1989; 13:621-623
34. Oliver GJA, Pemberton MA, Rhodes C et al. An in vitro model for identifying skin-corrosive chemicals.1, Toxicol in Vitro 1988;2:7-17
35. Bell E, Gay R, Swiderek M et al. Use of fabricated living tissue and organ equivalents as defined higher order systems for the study of pharmacologic responses to test substances. Presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Pharmaceutical Application of Cell and Tissue Culture to Drug Transport, Bandol, France, September 4-9, 1989
36. Helman RG, Hall JW, Kao JV. Acute dermal toxicity: in vivo and in vitro comparisons in mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1986; 7:94-100
37. Geller W, Kobel W, Seifert G. Overview of animal test methods for skin irritation. Fundam Chem Toxicol 1985; 23: 165-168
38. Bloom E, Maibach HI, Tammi R. In vitro models for cutaneous effects of glucocorticoids using human skin organ and cell culture. In: Maibach HI, Lowe NJ (eds) Models in dermatology. Vol. 4 Karger, New York, 1989; pp 12-19
39. Blake-Haskins JC, Scala D, Rhein LD et al. Predicting surfactant irritation from the swelling response of a collagen film. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1986; 37:199-210
40. Choman BR. Determination of the response of skin to chemical agents by an in vitro procedure. J Invest Dermatol 1963; 44:177-182
41. Parce JW, Owicki JC, Kercso KM et al. Detection of cellaffecting agents with a silicon biosensor. Science 1989; 246:243-247
42. Schreiber S, Kilgus O, Payer E et al. Cytokine pattern of Langerhans cells isolated from murine epidermal cell cultures. J Immunol 1992; 149:3524-3534
43. Gerberick GF, Sikorski EE, Ryan CA, Limardi LC. Use of cytokines in dermatotoxicology. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) Dermatotoxicology methods: the laboratory worker's vade mecum. Taylor & Francis, Washington DC, 1997; pp 187-206
44. Bulich AA, Greene MW, Isenberg DL. Reliability of bacterial luminescence assay for determination of the toxicity of pure compounds and complex effluents. In: Branson DR, Kickson KL (eds) Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment, 4th Conference. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM 737), Philadelphia, 1981; 338-437
45. Silverman J. Preliminary findings on the use of protozoa (Tetrahymena thermophila) as models for ocular irritation testing rabbits. Lab Anim Sci 1983; 33:56-58
46. Silverman J, Pennisi S. Evaluation of Tetrahymena thermophila as an in vitro alternative to ocular irritation studies in rabbits. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1987; 6:33-42
47. Prunieras M. Skin and epidermal equivalents: a review. In: Rougier A, Goldberg AM, Maibach HI (eds) In vitro skin toxicology: irritation, phototoxicity, sensitization. Mary Ann Liebert, New York, 1994, pp 97-105
48. Patil SM, Patrick E, Maibach HI. Animal, human and in vitro test methods for predicting skin irritation. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) Dermatotoxicology, 5th edn. Taylor & Francis, Washington DC, 1996; pp 411-436