Scenario-based system testing of software product families with ScenTED;Szenario-basiertes Systemtesten von Software-Produktfamilien mit ScenTED

Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI)

Volumn P-45, Issue , 2004, Pages 169-186

  Kamsties, Erik ^a   Pohl, Klaus ^a   Reis, Sacha ^a   Reuys, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895319873     PISSN: 16175468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. th Intl. Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), Siena, Italy, November 2003.
2. Binder, R.V.; „Testing Object-Oriented Systems: Models, Patterns, and Tools“; Addison-Wesley, 2000.
3. Booch, G.; Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I.; „The Unified Modeling Language User Guide“; Addison-Wesley, 1999.
4. Briand, L.; Labiche, Y.; „A UML-Based Approach to System Testing“; Journal on Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM),Vol. 1, No. 1, 2002.
5. Clemens, P.; Northrop, L.; „Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns“; Addison-Wesley; 2002.
6. Cockburn, A; „Writing Effective Use Cases“; Addison-Wesley, 2001.
7. Halmans, G.; Pohl, K.; „Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers“; Journal on Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), Vol. 2, No. 1, Springer, March 2003.
8. th Intl. Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), Siena, Italy, November 2003.
9. th World Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology (IDPT-2003), Austin, USA, December 2003.
10. McGregor, J.D.; „Testing a Software Product Line“; Technical Report CMU/SEI-2001TR-022, December 2001.
11. Myers, G.J.; „The Art of Software Testing“; Wiley, 1979.
12. Nebut C.; Pickin, S.; Le Traon, Y.; Jézéquel, J.-M.; „Reusable Test Requirements for UML-Modeled Product Lines“; Intl. Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines (REPL'02), Essen, Germany, September 2002.
13. th Intl. Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), Siena, Italy, November 2003.
14. st Intl. Workshop on the Unified Modeling Language (UML 98), Mulhouse, France, June 1998.
15. Reuys, A.; Kamsties, E.; Pohl, K.; Götz, H.; Neumann, J.; Weingärtner, J.; „Testen von Software-Produktvarianten - ein Erfahrungsbericht“, Teilkonferenz zu Software-Produktlinien im Rahmen der Multi-Konferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2004), Essen, März 2004.
16. Reuys, A.; Reis, S.; Kamsties, E.; Pohl, K.; „Derivation of Domain Test Scenarios from Activity Diagrams“; Intl. Workshop on Product Line Engineering The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing (PLEES'03), Erfurt, Germany, September 2003.
17. Riebisch, M; Böllert, K.; Streitferdt, D.; Franczyk, B.; „Extending the UML to Model System Families“; Intl. Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology (IDPT 2000), Dallas, Texas, USA, June 2000.
18. Svahnberg, M.; van Gurp, J.; Bosch, J.; „On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines“; Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 2001.
19. van der Linden, F.; „Software Product Families in Europe: The Esaps & Café Projects”; IEEE Software, Vol. 19, No. 4, July/August 2002.
20. Winter, M.; „Qualitätssicherung für objektorientierte Software - Anforderungsermittlung und Test gegen die Anforderungsspezifikation“; Dissertation, FernUniversität Ha-gen, September 1999.