Orchestrating learning in a one-to-one technology classroom

New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 451-467

  Niramitranon, Jitti ^a   Sharples, Mike ^a   Greenhalgh, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895273491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Anastopoulou S. Sharples M. Wright M. Martin H. Ainsworth S. Benford S. et al. (2008). Learning 21st century science in context with mobile technologies. In B. C. Traxler John. Riordan (Ed.) Mlearn 2008 conference (pp. 12-19).
2. Asensio-Peśrez J. Bote-Lorenzo M. Vega-Gorgojo G. Dimitriadis Y. Gómez-Sánchez E. & Villasclaras-Fernández E. (2008). Adding mash-up based tailorability to VLEs for scripted collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on mash-up personal learning environments(mupple08) (Vol. 388 pp. 14-17).
3. Britain S. (2004). A review of learning design: Concept specifications and tools. JISC report 20
4. Chan T. W. Roschelle J. Hsi S. Kinshuk K. Sharples M. Brown T. et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 1 3-29
5. Dalziel J. (2003). Implementing learning design: The learning activity anagement system (LAMS). In Proceedings of the ascilite 2003 conference Adelaide (p. 25
6. Dalziel J. R. (2006). Lessons from LAMS for IMS learning design. In Sixth international conference on advanced learning technologies (p. 1101-1102).
7. Dillenbourg P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.) Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland
8. Dillenbourg P. & Crivelli Z. (2009). A model of collaborative learning scripts instantiated with mobile technologies. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1(1) 36-48
9. Ferraris C. Martel C. & Vignollet L. (2007). LDL for collaborative activities. In L. Botturi & T. Stubbs (Eds.) Handbook of visual languages in instructional design: Theories and practices (pp. 226-253). Hershey PA: Idea Group. Chapter XII
10. Fischer F. Kollar I. Mandl H. & Haake J. M. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6). Boston MA: Springer US.
11. Giemza A. Weinbrenner S. Engler J. & Hoppe H. U. (2007). Tuple spaces as a flexible integration platform for distributed learning environments. Supporting Learning Flow Through Integrative Tech-nologies 313-320
12. Hernández-Leo D. Villasclaras-Ferñandez E. Jarrín-Abellán I. Asensio-Peśrez J. Dimitriadis Y. Ruiz-Requies I. et al. (2006). COLLAGE a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society 9(1) 58-71
13. Jermann P. & Dillenbourg P. (1999). An analysis of learner arguments in a collective learning environment. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning
14. Kobbe L.,Weinberger A. Dillenbourg P. Harrer A. Hämäläinen R. Häkkinen P. et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning 2(2) 211-224
15. Kollar I. Fischer F. & Hesse F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18(2) 159-185
16. Koper R. & Tattersall C. (2005). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Netherlands: Springer
17. Koschmann T. (1996). CSCL theory and practice of an emerging paradigm: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
18. Laurillard D. Oliver M. Wasson B. & Hoppe U. (2009). Implementing Technology-Enhanced learning. Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products 289-306
19. Liu T. C. Liang J. K. Wang H. Y. Chan T. W. & Wei L. H. (2003). Embedding educlick in classroom to enhance interaction. In Proceedings of international conference on computers in education (ICCE) (p. 117-125).
20. Lowery R. C. (2005). Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: A comparison of commercial products in the higher education market. In Annual meeting of the southwestern social science association and its affiliates march (p. 2326
21. Miao Y. Hoeksema K. Hoppe H. U. & Harrer A. (2005). CSCL scripts: Modelling features and potential use. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on computer support for collaborative learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 423-432). International Society of the Learning Sciences
22. Naismith L. Lonsdale P. Vavoula G. & Sharples M. (2004). Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. A Report for NESTA Futurelab. ISBN: 0-9548594
23. Niramitranon J. Sharples M. & Greenhalgh C. (2006). COML (Classroom orchestration modelling language) and scenarios designer: Toolsets to facilitate collaborative learning in a One-to-One technology classroom. Selected Papers from the Kaleidoscope Convergence Workshop: Amsterdam The Netherlands
24. Niramitranon J. Sharples M. & Greenhalgh C. (2009) (Paper accepted). Designing and orchestrating collaborative learning in a one-to- one classroom. In The 17th international conference on computers in education ICCE 2009 Hongkong
25. Niramitranon J. Sharples M. Greenhalgh C. & Lin C. (2007). SceDer and COML: Toolsets for learning design and facilitation in one-to- one technology classroom. In U. S. Hirashima T.Hoppe (Eds.) ICCE-07 (pp. 385-391). Netherlands: IOS Press
26. Nussbaum M. Alvarez C. McFarlane A. Gomez F. Claro S. & Radovic D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education 52(1) 147-153
27. Pinkwart N. Hoppe H. U. Milrad M. & Perez J. (2003). Educational scenarios for cooperative use of personal digital assistants. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 383-391
28. Roschelle J. & Pea R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL (Vol. 2) Boulder CO.
29. Roschelle J. Rafanan K. Estrella G. Nussbaum M. & Claro S. (2009). From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework. In Proceedings of computer supported collaborative learning practices (pp. 395-403). Rhodes Greece: ISLS
30. Roschelle J. Schank P. Brecht J. Tatar D. & Chaudhury S. R. (2005). From response systems to distributed systems for enhanced collaborative learning. In Proceeding of the 13th international conference on computers in education (ICCE 2005) (pp. 363-370
31. Roschelle J. Tatar D. Chaudbury S. R. Dimitriadis Y. Patton C. DiGiano C. et al. (2007). Ink improvisation and interactive engagement: Learning with tablets. Computer 40(9) 42-48
32. Sharples M. (2000 April). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education 34(3-4) 177-193
33. van Es R. & Koper R. (2006). Testing the pedagogical expressiveness of IMS LD. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 9(1) 229
34. Weinberger A. Ertl B. Fischer F. & Mandl H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science 33(1) 130
35. Zurita G. & Nussbaum M. (2004). Mcscl: Mobile computer supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 42(3) 289-314
36. Zurita G. Nussbaum M. & Shaples M. (2003). Encouraging face-to-face collaborative learning through the use of handheld computers in the classroom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 193-208