Beyond need satisfaction: Empowering and accepting messages from third parties ineffectively restore trust and consequent reconciliation

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 126-140

  Shnabel, Nurit ^a   Nadler, Arie ^a   Dovidio, John F ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895109422     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2002     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: Henry Holt.
2. Benziman, Y. (2009). Forgive and not forget: The ethics of forgiveness. Jerusalem: Van Leer [in Hebrew].
3. Black, D., Baumgartner, M.P. (1983). Toward a theory of the third party. In K. O. Boyum, L. Mather (Eds.), Empirical theories about courts (pp. 84-114). New York: Longman.
4. Blatz, C.W., Schumann, K., Ross, M. (2009) Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219-241.
5. Brookings, J.B., Bolton, B. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis of a measure of intrapersonal empowerment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 292-298.
6. Buckley, K. E., Winkel, R. E., Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14-28.
7. Cushman, F.A., Greene, J.D. (2012). The philosopher in the theater. In M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 33-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Enright, R.D., Freedman, S., Rique, J. (1998). The psychology of interpersonal forgiveness. In R.D. Enright, J. North (Eds.) Exploring forgiveness (pp.46-62). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. Evans, A.M., Revelle, W.(2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585-1593.
10. Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 133-155). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Fisher, R., Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.
12. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
13. Fitzgibbons, R.P. (1998). Anger and the healing power of forgiveness: A psychiatrist' s view. In R.D. Enright, J. North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp.63-74). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
14. Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2003). A human being died that night: A South-African story of forgiveness. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Transforming trauma in the aftermath of gross human rights abuses: Making public spaces intimate through the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In A. Nadler, T.E. Malloy, J.D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 57-75). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Gonzales, M. H., Manning, D. J., Haugen, J. A. (1992). Explaining our sins: Factors influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 958-971.
17. Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J. (2013). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12028
18. Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
19. Hughes, P. M. (1993). What is involved in forgiving? Journal of Value Inquiry, 27, 331-340.
20. Kelley, K., Preacher, K.J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17, 137-152.
21. Knowles, W. (1958). Mediation and the psychology of small groups. Labor Law Review, 9, 780-784.
22. Kolb, D. M. (1987). Who are organizational third parties and what do they do? In M. H. Bazerman, R. J. Lewicki, B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 207-221). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23. Kramer, R.M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
24. Kressel, K., Pruitt, D. G. (1989). Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict. In K. Kressel, D.G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 394-436). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Leunissen, J.M., De Cremer, D., Reinders Folmer, C.P. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 215-222.
26. Maoz, I. (1999). The impact of third-party communications on the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 11-25.
27. Maoz, I. (2012). Threat versus promise framing: The effects of framing concession appeals as threats versus promises in news coverage on support for compromise proposals in conflict. Unpublished manuscript.
28. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
29. McGary, H. (1989). Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 26, 343-350.
30. Monin, B., Miller, D.T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
31. Nadler, A., Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470.
32. Nadler, A., Shnabel, N. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio-emotional paths and the need based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, J.D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-374.
34. Oppenheimer, D.M., Meyvis, T., Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
35. Ross, L. 1995. Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. In K. Arrow, R. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, R. Wilson (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 26-42). New York: Norton.
36. Rubin, J.Z. (1980). Experimental research on third-party intervention in conflict: Toward some generalizations. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 379-391.
37. Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Scheff, T.J. (1994). Bloody revenge: Emotions, nationalism and war. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Schönbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Scobie, E. D., Scobie, G. E. W. (1998). Damaging events: The perceived need for forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 373-401.
41. Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.
42. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
43. Smith, W. P. (1985). Effectiveness of the biased mediator. Negotiation Journal, 1, 363-372.
44. Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Volkan, V. D. (1985). The need to have enemies and allies: A developmental approach. Political Psychology, 6, 219-247.
46. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., Platow, M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 909-930.
47. Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K., Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75-89). New York: Information Age Publishing.