MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1629-1639

  Uyan, Mevlut ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; GIS; Municipal solid waste; Site selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895076730     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2567-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Carrión JA, Estrella AE, Dols FA, Torob MZ, Rodríguez M, Ridao AR (2008) Environmental decision-support systems for evaluating the carrying capacity of land areas: optimal siteselection for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(9): 2358-2380.
2. Cay T, Uyan M (2013) Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Land Use Policy 30: 541-548.
3. Chakraborty S, Banik D (2006) Design of a material handling equipment selection model using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28: 1237-1245.
4. Chang NB, Parvathinathan G, Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87: 139-153.
5. Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Pesevski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic. AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67: 121-131.
6. Eastman JR, Weigen J, Kyem PAK, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61(5): 539-547.
7. Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmodi S (2012) An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical and socio-cultural area. Waste Manag (Oxford) 32: 1528-1538.
8. Farzanmanesh A, Naeeni AG, Abdullah AM (2010) Parking site selection management using fuzzy logic and multi criteria decision making. Environ Asia 3: 109-116.
9. Goorah S, Esmyot M, Boojhawon R (2009) The health impact of nonhazardous solid waste disposal in a community: the case of the Mare Chicose landfill in Mauritius. J Environ Health 72: 48-54.
10. Gorsevski PV, Donevska KR, Mitrovski CD, Frizado JP (2012) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Manag 32: 287-296.
11. Guiqin W, Li Q, Guoxue L, Lijun C (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Manag 90: 2414-2421.
12. Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 9: 251-273.
13. Kontos TD, Komilis DP, Halvadakis CP (2005) Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Manag (Oxford) 25: 818-832.
14. Korucu MK, Erdagi B (2012) A criticism of applications with multi-criteria decision analysis that are used for the site selection for the disposal of municipal solid wastes. Waste Manag (in press).
15. Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For Policy Econ 1(1): 41-52.
16. Longdill PC, Healy TR, Black KP (2008) An integrated GIS approach for sustainable aquaculture management area site selection. Ocean Coast Manag 51(8-9): 612-624.
17. Moeinaddini M, Khorasani N, Danehkar A, Darvishsefat AA, Zienalyan M (2010) Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Manag (Oxford) 30: 912-920.
18. Murphy S (2003) Development and assessment of a spatial decision support system for conservation planning. Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Maine, USA.
19. Pérez OM, Ross LG, Telfer TC, Barquin LMC (2003) Water quality requirements for marine fish cage siteselection in Tenerife (Canary Islands): predictive modelling and analysis using GIS. Aquaculture 224(1-4): 51-68.
20. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
21. Sener S, Sener E, Nas B, Karaguzel R (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manag (Oxford) 30: 2037-2046.
22. Siddiqui M, Everett JM, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122: 515-523.
23. Sumathi VR, Natesan U, Sarkar C (2008) GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Manag (Oxford) 28: 2146-2160.
24. TURKSTAT (2008) Turkish statistical institute, environmental statistics/solid waste statistics of municipalities. http://www. turkstat. gov. tr. Accessed 26 November 2012.
25. Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1): 1-29.
26. Wu F (1998) SimLand: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 12(1): 63-82.
27. Yi{dotless}lmaz E (1999) Analitik hiyerarşi süreci kullanarak çok kriterli karar verme problemlerinin çözümü. T. C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}, Doǧu Akdeniz Ormanci{dotless}li{dotless}k Araşti{dotless}rma Enstitüsü, DOA Dergisi, Yayi{dotless}n No. 127, DOA Yayi{dotless}n No. 16. ISSN 1300-8544, 95-122, Mersin (in Turkish).
28. Zamorano M, Molero E, Hurtado A, Grindlay A, Ramos A (2008) Evaluation of a municipal landfill site in southern Spain with GIS-aided methodology. J Hazard Mater 160: 473-481.
29. Zou X, Li D (2008) A multidisciplinary GIS-based approach for the potential evaluation of land consolidation projects: a model and its application. In: 7th WSEAS International conference on applied computer and applied computational science, China, pp 551-556.
30. Zucca A, Sharifi AM, Fabbri AG (2008) Application of spatial multi-criteria analysis to siteselection for a local park: a case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. J Environ Manag 88(4): 752-769.