In vivo porcine model for practicing retrograde intrarenal surgery

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-67

  Tunc, Lutfi ^a   Resorlu, Berkan ^d   Unsal, Ali ^b   Oguz, Ural ^b   Diri, Akif ^e   Gozen, Ali Serdar ^f   Bedir, Selahattin ^c   Ozgok, Yasar ^c  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Kecioren Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^c GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^d ÇANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^e Aksaray State Hospital   (Turkey)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Porcine model; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Stone fragments

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CYSTOSCOPY; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; MOTOR SKILLS; SWINE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; URETEROSCOPY; UROLOGY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CYSTOSCOPE; CYSTOSCOPY; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPE; GUIDE WIRE; HOLMIUM LASER; IN VIVO STUDY; KIDNEY PELVIS; KIDNEY SURGERY; LITHOTOMY POSITION; LITHOTRIPSY; NONHUMAN; PORCINE MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SWINE; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 84895075388     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: 14230399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000351420     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, et al: A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: The 'resorluunsal stone score'. Urology 2012; 80: 512-518
2. Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, et al: Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective comparative study. BJU Int 2012; 110: 346-349
3. Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, et al: Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1131-1135
4. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, et al: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater-is this the new frontier? J Urol 2008; 179: 981-984
5. Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, et al: A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithoptripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol 2012; 26: 52-57
6. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al: Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: A randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 2010; 75: 534-539
7. Laing KA, Lam TBL, McClinton S, et al: Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy: Results from a systemic review of the literature. Urol Int 2012; 89: 380-386
8. Bach C, Nesar S, Kumar P, et al: The new digital flexible ureteroscopes: 'size does matter'-increased ureteric access sheath use! Urol Int 2012; 89: 408-411
9. Zhang Y, Ou TW, Jia JG, et al: Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory. Urology 2008; 72: 513-516
10. Strohmaier WL, Giesa A: Improved ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 2009; 37: 107-110
11. Lee CL, Anderson JK, Monga M: Residency training in percutaneous renal access: Does it affect urological practice? J Urol 2004; 171: 592-595
12. Paterson RF, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, et al: Percutaneous stone implantation in the pig kidney: A new animal model for lithotripsy research. J Endourol 2002; 16: 543-547
13. Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF: A new approach to urology training: A laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1950-1952
14. Imkamp F, Von Klot C, Nagele U, et al: New ex-vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery. Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37: 388-394
15. Sampaio FJ, Pereira-Sampaio MA, Favorito LA: The pig kidney as an endourologic model: Anatomic contribution. J Endourol 1998; 12: 45-50
16. Schwalb D, Eshghi M, Cord J, et al: The minipig as a practical endourologic model. J Endourol 1989; 3: 85-90