USCOM - Window to the circulation: Utility of supra-sternal Doppler in an elderly anaesthetized patient for a robotic cystectomy

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 83-93

  Critchley, Lester A H ^a   Huang, Li ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Doppler; Robotic surgery; Supra sternal

Indexed keywords

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CYSTECTOMY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESOPHAGUS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84895074457     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9499-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Koo KK, Sun JC, Zhou Q, Guyatt G, Cook DJ, Walter SD, Meade MO. Pulmonary artery catheters: evolving rates and reasons for use. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1613-8.
2. Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:121-34.
3. Chong SW, Peyton PJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia. 2012;67:1266-71.
4. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392-402.
5. Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:748-53.
6. USCOM. USCOM users manual. Sydney: USCOM Ltd.; 2012.
7. Dey I, Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:193-9.
8. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart. 1920;7:353-70.
9. Smith BE, Madigan VM. Non-invasive method for rapid bedside estimation of inotropy: theory and preliminary clinical validation. Br J Anaesth. (Epub) Aug 1, 2013.
10. He SR, Sun X, Zhang C, Jian Z, Sun YX, Zheng ML, Liu YM, Madigan VM, Smith BE. Measurement of systemic oxygen delivery and inotropy in healthy term neonates with the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:289-94.
11. Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, Weyman AE. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:983-8.
12. Cholley BP, Singer M. Esophageal Doppler: noninvasive cardiac output monitor. Echocardiography. 2003;20:763-9.
13. Critchley LA. Differences between Cardio-Q and USCOM Doppler cardiac output readings in high risk surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(Suppl 2):113-114 (Abstract).
14. Huang L, Critchley LA. Comparison of USCOM and CardioQ Doppler cardiac output in high risk surgery. Anaesth Intens Care. 2013;41:(Abstract)(in press).
15. Derrick J. Monitor software Version 1.1.1b for MacIntosh. http://www.anaesthesia.med.usyd.edu.au/resources/datalogging/monitor.html (2013). Accessed 17 May 2013.
16. Wolf JS Jr, Monk TG, McDougall EM, McClennan BL, Clayman RV. The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol. 1995;154:959-63.
17. Critchley LA, Ho AM. Surgical emphysema as a cause of severe hypercapnia during laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38:1094-100.
18. Cattermole GNLP, Tang CO, Smith BE, Graham CA, Rainer TH. A new method to score the quality of USCOM scans. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2009;16:288.
19. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180-92.
20. Perrino AC Jr, Fleming J, LaMantia KR. Transesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: performance during aortic reconstructive surgery. Anesth Analg. 1991;73:705-10.
21. Phillips RA, Hood SG, Jacobson BM, West MJ, Wan L, May CN. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) accuracy and efficacy compared with flow probe and transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): an ovine cardiac output validation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;ID:621496.
22. Huang L, Critchley LA. A study to determine the reliability of supra-sternal Doppler (USCOM) during general anaesthesia: effects of scan quality, flow volume and increasing age. Br J Anaesth. (Epub) Jul 23, 2013.
23. Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:596-604.
24. Singer M. Oesophageal Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:244-8.
25. Lee SW, Khaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Leung TY, Critchley LA. Haemodynamic effects from aortocaval compression at different angles of lateral tilt in non-labouring term pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:950-6.
26. Armstrong S, Fernando R, Columb M, Jones T. Cardiac index in term pregnant women in the sitting, lateral, and supine positions: an observational, crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:318-22.