Accuracy of the all patient refined diagnosis related groups classification system in congenital heart surgery

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 641-650

  Parnell, Aimee S ^a   Shults, Justine ^b,c   Gaynor, J William ^b,c   Leonard, Mary B ^b,c   Dai, Dingwei ^c   Feudtner, Chris ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups; APR DRG; CHS; congenital heart surgery; D TGA; d transposition of the great arteries with or without VSD; day of life 1 admission; DOL1; ECMO; extracorporeal membrane support oxygenation; HLHS; hypoplastic left heart syndrome; ICD 9 CM; Pediatric Hospital Information Systems; PHIS; tetralogy of Fallot; TOF; using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision Clinical Modification; ventricular septal defect; VSD

Indexed keywords

20; 21; 4; ALL PATIENT REFINED DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUPS; APR-DRG; CHS; CONGENITAL HEART SURGERY; D-TGA; D-TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT ARTERIES, WITH OR WITHOUT VSD; DAY OF LIFE 1 ADMISSION; DOL1; ECMO; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE SUPPORT OXYGENATION; HLHS; HYPOPLASTIC LEFT HEART SYNDROME; ICD-9-CM; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PHIS; TETRALOGY OF FALLOT; TOF; USING INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, 9TH REVISION, CLINICAL MODIFICATION; VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT; VSD;

CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; FEMALE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84895066152     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards For Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Consensus Report. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2011/12/National-Voluntary-Consensus- Standards-for-Pediatric-Cardiac-Surgery-A-Consensus-Report. Aspx. Accessed March 2012.
2. S. Bolsin, and P. Barach The role and influence of public reporting of pediatric cardiac care outcome data Prog Pediatr Cardiol 33 2012 99 101
3. M.J. Elliott The role of information in ensuring quality and patient safety Prog Pediatr Cardiol 33 2012 5 10
4. J.P. Jacobs, M.L. Jacobs, and F.G. Lacour-Gayet et al. Stratification of complexity improves the utility and accuracy of outcomes analysis in a Multi-Institutional Congenital Heart Surgery Database: Application of the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) and Aristotle Systems in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database Pediatr Cardiol 30 2009 1117 1130
5. D.M. Shanian, T. Silverstein, A.F. Lovett, R.E. Wolf, and S.L. Normand Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards Circulation 155 2007 1518 1527
6. M.L. Jacobs, J.P. Jacobs, and R.C. Franklin et al. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and pediatric cardiac disease - the perspective of cardiac surgery Cardiol Young 18 Suppl 2 2008 101 115
7. S.M. O'Brien, D.R. Clark, and J.P. Jacobs et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138 2009 1139 1153
8. S.K. Pasquali, E.D. Peterson, and J.P. Jacobs et al. Differential case ascertainment in clinical registry versus administrative data and impact on outcomes assessment in pediatric cardiac operations Ann Thorac Surg 95 2013 195 203
9. R.J. Carroll, Z.D. Mulla, L.D. Hauck, and A. Westbrook Outcomes of patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: does nesiritide make a difference? BMC Cardiovasc Disord 7 2007 37
10. C.G. Gourin, A.A. Forastiere, G. Sanguineti, W.M. Koch, S. Marur, and R.E. Bristow Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of laryngeal cancer surgical care Laryngoscope 121 2011 85 90
11. P.C. Kuo, A.R. Douglas, D. Oleski, D.O. Jacobs, and R.A. Schroeder Determining benchmarks for evaluation and management coding in an academic division of general surgery J Am Coll Surg 199 2004 124 130
12. N. Nante, G. Messina, M. Cecchini, O. Bertetto, F. Moirano, and M. McKee Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment J Epidemiol Community Health 63 2009 203 208
13. A.B. Sedman, V. Bahl, and E. Bunting et al. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups Pediatrics 114 2004 965 969
14. Y. Shen Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA Med Care 41 6 Suppl 2003 II103 II110
15. D. Baram, F. Daroowalla, and R. Garcia et al. Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) risk of mortality score as a severity adjustor in the medical ICU Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med 2 2008 19 25
16. M.F. De Marco, L. Lorenzoni, P. Addari, and N. Nante Evaluation of the capacity of the APR-DRG classification system to predict hospital mortality [in Italian] Epidemiol Prev 26 2002 183 190
17. R. Rutledge, and T. Osler The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization J Trauma 45 1998 791 799