Evaluation of a patient-reported continuity of care model for older adults

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 185-193

  Bentler, Suzanne E ^a   Morgan, Robert O ^b   Virnig, Beth A ^c   Wolinsky, Fredric D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuity of care; Older adults; Patient reports

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELDERLY CARE; ETHNOLOGY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING HOME; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MEDICARE; NURSING HOMES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF REPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84895058794     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0472-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1996). Primary care: America's health in a new era. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
2. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2003). Priority areas for national action: Transforming health care quality. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
3. Ginsburg, P. B., Maxfield, M., O'Malley, A. S., Peikes, D., & Pham, H. H. (2008). Making medical homes work: Moving from concept to practice. In Policy perspective No. 1, December 2008. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
4. AAFP, AAP, ACP, & AOA. (February 2007). Joint principles of the patient centered medical home. Available at the patient-centered primary care collaborative. http://pcpcc.net/content/joint-principles-patient-centered- medical-home. Accessed 15 Feb 2012.
5. Carrier, E., Gourevitch, M. N., & Shah, N. R. (2009). Medical homes: Challenges in translating theory into practice. Medical Care, 47(7), 714-722.
6. O'Malley, A. S., Peikes, D., & Ginsburg, P. B. (2008). Qualifying practices as medical homes. In Policy perspective No. 1, December 2008. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
7. Stanek, M., & Takach, M. (2010). Evaluating the patient-centered medical home: Potential and limitations of claims-based data. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.
8. Scholle, S. H., Torda, P., Peikes, D., Han, E., & Genevro, J. (June 2010). Engaging patients and families in the medical home. Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA290200900019I TO2. AHRQ Publication No. 10-0083-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
9. Bitton, A., Martin, C., & Landon, B. E. (2010). A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(6), 584-592.
10. National Partnership for Women and Families. (2009). Principles for patient- and family-centered care: the medical home from the consumer perspective. Available at http://www.nationalpartnership.org/site/DocServer/ Advocate-Toolkit-Consumer-Principles-3-30-09.pdf?docID=4821. Accessed 31 March 2012.
11. National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2010a). PCMH 2011 public comment - Optional module: Recognition in patient experiences. Available at http://www.ncqa.org/portals/0/publiccomment/pcmh-publi-%20comment-patient-exp- 527FINAL.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2012.
12. Gray, B. M., Weng, W., & Holmboe, E. S. (2012). An assessment of patient-based and practice infrastructure-based measures of the patient-centered medical home: Do we need to ask the patient? Health Services Research, 47(1), 4-21.
13. Saultz, J. W. (2003). Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 1(3), 134-143.
14. Ben-Sira, Z. (1976). The function of the professional's affective behavior in client satisfaction: A revised approach to social interaction theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 17(1), 3-11.
15. Ben-Sira, Z. (1980). Affective and instrumental components in the physician-patient relationship: An additional dimension of interaction theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(2), 170-180.
16. Anderson, G. (2010). Chronic care: Making the case for ongoing care (p. 12). Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
17. Jee, S. H., & Cabana, M. D. (2006). Indices for continuity of care: A systematic review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(2), 158-188. (Pubitemid 43344150)
18. Wei, I. I., Virnig, B. A., John, D. A., & Morgan, R. O. (2006). Using a Spanish surname match to improve identification of Hispanic women in Medicare administrative data. Health Services Research, 41(4), 1469-1481. (Pubitemid 44114609)
19. Morgan, R. O., Teal, C. R., Hasche, J. C., Petersen, L. A., Byrne, M. M., Paterniti, D. A., et al. (2008). Does poorer familiarity with Medicare translate into worse access to health care? JAGS, 56, 2053-2060.
20. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). Amos (Version 20.0) [computer program]. Chicago: SPSS.
21. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
23. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahway, NF: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
25. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., & Gandek, B. (2001). How to score and interpret the single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
26. Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-402). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Robles, J. (1995). Confirmation bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 73-83.
28. Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge.
29. Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 517-529. (Pubitemid 36288927)
30. Reid, R. J., Haggerty, J. L., & McKendry, R. (2002). Defusing the confusion: Concepts and measures of continuity of healthcare. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
31. Haggerty, J. L., Reid, R. J., Freeman, G. K., Starfield, B. H., Adair, C. E., & McKendry, R. (2003). Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. BMJ, 327(7425), 1219.
32. Ridd, M. J., Lewis, G., Peters, T. J., & Salisbury, C. (2011). Patient-Doctor depth-of-relationship scale: Development and validation. The Annals of Family Medicine, 9(6), 538-545.
33. Doescher, M. P., Saver, B. G., Fiscella, K., & Franks, P. (2001). Racial/ethnic inequities in continuity and site of care: Location, location, location. HSR. Health Services Research, 36(6), 78-89.
34. Phillips, K. A., Mayer, M. L., & Aday, L. (2000). Barriers to care among racial/ethnic groups under managed care. Health Affairs, 19(4), 65-75.
35. Flocke, S. A., Stange, K. C., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1997). The impact of insurance type and forced discontinuity on the delivery of primary care. Journal of Family Practice, 45(2), 129-135. (Pubitemid 27368648)
36. Cabana, M. D., & Jee, S. H. (2004). Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? Journal of Family Practice, 53(12), 974-980. (Pubitemid 39612673)
37. Nutting, P. A., Goodwin, M. A., Flocke, S. A., Zyzanski, S. J., & Stange, K. C. (2003). Continuity of primary care: To whom does it matter and when? The Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 149-155.
38. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Expanded 12-month survey with CAHPS patient-centered medical home (PCMH) items. Available at https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/Surveys-Guidance/CG/PCMH.aspx. Accessed 2 April 2012.
39. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration. Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Access to Care: [United States]. 2nd ICPSR release. Baltimore, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
40. Gulliford, M. C., Naithani, S., & Morgan, M. (2006). Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: An experience-based measure. The Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 548-555. (Pubitemid 44916081)