Impact of accelerometer wear time on physical activity data: A NHANES semisimulation data approach

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 278-282

  Herrmann, Stephen D ^a   Barreira, Tiago V ^b   Kang, Minsoo ^c   Ainsworth, Barbara E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; EXERCISE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEASUREMENT; MOTIVATION; NUTRITION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND EXERCISE METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND EXERCISE METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; DATA COLLECTION; EXERCISE; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; NUTRITION SURVEYS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

EID: 84895035517     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: 14730480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091410     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hamilton MT, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, et al. Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2008;2:292-8.
2. Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN. Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? Annu Rev Public Health 2011;32:349-65.
3. Troiano RP. A timely meeting: objective measurement of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:S487-S9.
4. Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, et al. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:1376-81.
5. Levin S, Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, et al. Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. Ann Epidemiol 1999;9:481-8.
6. Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:1167-72.
7. Rowe DA, Kemble CD, Robinson TS, et al. Daily walking in older adults: day-to-day variability and criterion-referenced validity of total daily step counts. J Phys Act Health 2007;4:434-46.
8. Kang M, Rowe DA, Barreira TV, et al. Individual information-centered approach for handling physical activity missing data. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009;80:131-7.
9. Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Murray DM, et al. Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(11 Suppl):S555-62.
10. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531-43.
11. Gabriel KP, McClain JJ, Schmid KK, et al. Issues in accelerometer methodology: the role of epoch length on estimates of physical activity and relationships with health outcomes in overweight, post-menopausal women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:53.
12. Banda JA, Hutto B, Feeney A, et al. Comparing physical activity measures in a diverse group of midlife and older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:2251-7.
13. Mâsse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37(11 Suppl):S544-54.
14. Boarnet MG, Forsyth A, Day K, et al. The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: results of a predictive validity study for the Irvine Minnesota Inventory. Environ and Behav 2011;43:735-75.
15. Forsyth A, Michael Oakes J, Lee B, et al. The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? Transp Res Part D Trans Environ 2009;14:42-9.
16. Slootmaker SM, Schuit AJ, Chinapaw M J M, et al. Disagreement in physical activity assessed by accelerometer and self-report in subgroups of age, gender, education and weight status. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009;6:17.
17. Spittaels H, Verloigne M, Gidlow C, et al. Measuring physical activity-related environmental factors: reliability and predictive validity of the European environmental questionnaire ALPHA. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:48.
18. Evenson KR. Towards an understanding of change in physical activity from pregnancy through postpartum. Psychol Sport Exerc 2011;12:36-45.
19. Alzahrani MA, Ada L, Dean CM. Duration of physical activity is normal but frequency is reduced after stroke: an observational study. Res Q Exerc Sport 2011;57:47-51.
20. Young DR, Jerome GJ, Chen C, et al. Patterns of physical activity among overweight and obese adults. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6:A90.
21. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, et al. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep 2011;22:4-11.
22. Motl RW, Dlugonski D, Suh Y, et al. Accelerometry and its association with objective markers of walking limitations in ambulatory adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1942-7.
23. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:181-8.
24. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:777-81.
25. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:875-81.
26. Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjöström M, et al. Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity monitor during running and skating training in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Med 2000;21:586-92.
27. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, et al. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(9 Suppl):S450-6.
28. Kang M, Zhu W, Tudor-Locke C, et al. Experimental determination of effectiveness of an individual information-centered approach in recovering step-count missing data. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2005;9:233-50.
29. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1502-8.
30. Evenson KR, Terry JW. Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer nonwear time. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009;80:355-62.
31. Kang M, Bassett DR, Barreira TV, et al. How many days are enough? A study of 365 days of pedometer monitoring. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009;80:445-53.
32. Herrmann SD, Barriera T, Kang M, et al. How many hours are enough? Accelerometer wear time may provide bias in daily activity estimates. J Phys Act Health in press.
33. USDHHS. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 2008.
34. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2007;116:1081-93.
35. Colley R, Gorber SC, Tremblay MS. Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity. Health Rep 2010;21:63-9.
36. Jerome GJ, Young DR, Laferriere D, et al. Reliability of RT3 accelerometers among overweight and obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:110-4.
37. Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, et al. The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Review Paper. Sleep 2003;26:342-92.
38. Hofferth SL, Welk GJ, Treuth MS, et al. Validation of a diary measure of children's physical activities. Sociol Methodol 2008;38): 133-54.
39. Sadeh A, Acebo C. The role of actigraphy in sleep medicine. Sleep Med Rev 2002;6:113-24.