How information matters: Networks and public policy innovation

How Information Matters: Networks and Public Policy Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-230

  Hale, Kathleen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895006083     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (261)

1. Agranoff, Robert. 2007. Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 1998. Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(1):67-92.
3. -. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4. Alabama Administrative Office of the Courts. 1998. Alabama drug court association meets. Alabama Court News 6(1):11.
5. -. 2008. Alabama Unified Judicial System FY 2007 annual report and statistics. Montgomery: Alabama Administrative Office of the Courts.
6. ASC (Alabama Sentencing Commission). 2002. Sentencing reform: Initial report to the Alabama Legislature, January 7, 2002. Montgomery: ASC.
7. -. 2003 Recommendations for reform of Alabama's criminal justice system, 2004 report: A rational approach to sentence reform. Montgomery: ASC.
8. -. 2004. Recommendations for reform of Alabama's criminal justice system, 2004 report: A rational approach to sentence reform. Montgomery: ASC.
9. -. 2007. 2007 Report, collaborative success: Alabama implements sentencing standards. Montgomery: ASC.
10. -. 2008. 2008 report, sentencing standards implementation: Emphasis on data quality, collection and analysis. Montgomery: ASC.
11. Anheier, Helmut K., Stefan Toepler, and S. Wojciech Sokolowski. 1997. The implications of government funding for nonprofit organizations: Three propositions. International Journal of Public Sector Management 10(3):190-213.
12. Austin, James E. 2000. The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Balla, Steven J. 2001. Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research 29(3):221-45.
14. Bean, Philip. 2002. Drug courts, the judge and the rehabilitative ideal. In Drug courts in theory and in practice, edited by James L. Nolan Jr., 235-54. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
15. Beatty, Phillip, Amanda Petteruti, and Jason Ziedenberg. 2007. The vortex: The concentrated racial impact of drug imprisonment and the characteristics of punitive counties. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
16. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89(3):634-47.
17. Bedrick, Brooke, and Jerome H. Skolnick. 1999. From "treatment" to "justice" in Oakland, California. In The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation, Drugs, Health and Social Policy Series, Vol. 1, edited by W. Clinton Terry III, 43-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Belenko, Steven. 1998. Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review 1(1):1-42.
19. -. 1999a. Diverting drug offenders to treatment courts. In Case studies in judicial innovation, Drugs, Health and Social Policy Series, Vol. 1, edited by W. Clinton Terry III, 108-38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. -. 1999b. Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(1):1-58.
21. Berman, Evan M. 2006. Performance and productivity in public and nonprofit organizations, 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
22. Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt, with Sarah Glazer. 2005. Good courts: A case for problem-solving justice. New York: New Press.
23. Bernard, H. Russell. 2000. Social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. State lottery policy adoptions as policy innovation: An event history analysis of living-will laws. American Political Science Review. 84(2):395-415.
25. -. 1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 169-200. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science 41(4):327-48.
27. -. 2001. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the United States. ICPSR study 1208. Available at http://icspr.umich.edu.
28. Bhati, Avinash Singh, John K. Roman, and Aaron Chalfin. 2008. To treat or not to treat: Evidence on the prospects of expanding treatment to drug-involved offenders. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
29. Boldt, Richard. 1998. Rehabilitative punishment and the drug court treatment movement. Washington University Law Quarterly 76(4):1205-1306.
30. Boris, Elizabeth T. 2006. Nonprofit organizations in a democracy: Varied roles and responsibilities. In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 257-76. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
31. Boyum, David A., and Mark A. R. Kleiman. 2002. Substance abuse policy from a crime-control perspective. In Crime: Public policies for crime control, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia, 351-82. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
32. Braddock, David L., Richard E. Hemp, and Mary C. Richards. 2008. The state of the state in developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
33. Brooks, Arthur C. 2000. Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits? Public Administration Review 60(3):211-18.
34. -. 2004. Can nonprofit management help answer public management's "big questions"? Public Administration Review 62(3):259-66.
35. Bureau of Justice Assistance. 2005. Drug court discretionary grant program: FY 2005 resource guide for drug court applicants. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
36. Burgess, Philip M. 1975. Capacity building and the elements of public management. Public Administration Review 35(6):705-16.
37. California Secretary of State. 2008a. General election; Election night results. Sacramento: California Secretary of State. Available at http://vote.sos.ca.gov.
38. -. 2008b. Prop 5: Nonviolent drug offenses-sentencing, parole and rehabilitation-Initiative statute. Sacramento: California Secretary of State.
39. Camp, Robert C. 1995. Business process benchmarking: Finding and implementing best practices. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
40. Carey, Shannon M., and Michael W. Finigan. 2007. Indiana drug courts: Vigo County drug court process, outcome and cost evaluation. Portland: NPC Research.
41. Carey, Shannon M., Michael W. Finigan, and Kimberly Pukstas. 2008. Exploring the key components of drug courts: A comparative study of 18 adult drug courts on practices, outcomes, and costs. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
42. Carman, Joanne G. 2001. Community foundations: A growing resource for community development. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12(1) (Fall 2001):7-24.
43. -. 2007. Evaluation practice among community-based organizations. American Journal of Evaluation 28(1):60-75.
44. -. 2009. Nonprofits, funders and evaluation: Accountability in action. American Review of Public Administration 39(4):374-90.
45. Casey, Pamela M., and David B. Rottman. 2003. Problem-solving courts: Models and trends. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
46. Casey, Pamela M., David B. Rottman, and Chantal G. Bromage. 2007. Problemsolving justice toolkit. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
47. Cayer, N. Joseph. 2004. Public personnel administration, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
48. Chait, Richard P., Thomas P. Holland, and Barbara E. Taylor. 1996. Improving the performance of governing boards. Phoenix: Oryz Press.
49. Cheesman, Fred L., II, and Dawn Marie Rubio. 2004. Tennessee technical assistance project: Performance measures for Tennessee drug courts final report. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
50. Cigler, Beverly A. 1999. Pre-conditions for the emergence of multi-community collaborative organizations. Policy Studies Review 16(1):86-102.
51. Cissner, Amanda B., and Michael Rempel. 2005. The state of drug court research: Moving beyond "do they work?" New York: Center for Court Innovation.
52. Conlan, Timothy. 1998. From new federalism to devolution: Twenty-five years of intergovernmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
53. Conroy, Theresa. 2002. Let's hear it for the ex-drug offenders! Philadelphia Daily News, January 4.
54. Cooper, Caroline S. 1997. Drug courts: 1997 Overview of operational characteristics and implementation issues, Volume one: Preliminary Report. Washington, DC: American University Office of Justice Programs.
55. Derthick, Martha. 1970. The influence of federal grants: Public assistance in Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Deschenes, Elizabeth Piper, with Robert Mimura, Ralph Rogers, Beverly Marksbury, Mack Jenkins, and Rochelle Newble. 2000. Countywide approaches to drug court program implementation: A comparison of Los Angeles and Orange counties, California. National Drug Court Institute Review 3:57-99.
57. Deschenes, Elizabeth Piper, and Rebecca D. Peterson. 1999. Experimenting with the drug court model: Implementation and change. In The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation, Drugs, Health and Social Policy Series, Vol. 1, edited by W. Clinton Terry III, 139-65. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1835/1945. Democracy in America, the Henry Reeve text as revised by Francis Bowen. 2 vols. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Orig. pub. 1835.
59. De Vita, Carol J. 1999. Nonprofits and devolution: What do we know? In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 213-33. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
60. De Vita, Carol J., and Eric C. Twombly. 2006. Nonprofits and federalism. In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 257-76. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
61. Di Mascio, William M., with Marc Mauer, Kathleen Di Julia, and Karen Davidson. 1997. Seeking justice: Crime and punishment in America. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
62. Dowie, Mark. 2001. American foundations: An investigative history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Downs, George W., Jr. 1976. Bureaucracy, innovation and public policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
64. Downs, George W., Jr., and Lawrence B. Mohr. 1976. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(4):700-714.
65. Edwards, Erika. 2004. Drug court prevents overdoses in South Boston. Boston: Join Together Project, School of Public Health, Boston University.
66. Edwards, Leonard P. 2004. Remarks of Judge Leonard P. Edwards at the presentation of the William H. Rehnquist Award for Excellence. Journal of the Center for Families, Children and the Courts 5:169-80.
67. Eyestone, Robert. 1977. Confusion, diffusion and innovation. American Political Science Review 71(2):441-47.
68. Federal Bureau of Investigation, U. S. Department of Justice. 2006. Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, computer file, 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
69. First Judicial District of Pennsylvania. 2001. Drug treatment court recognized by Justice Dept. The Courterly 3(2):6.
70. Flango, Victor E., and David B. Rottman. 1992. Measuring trial court consolidation. Justice System Journal 16(4):65-74.
71. Fluellen, Reginald, and Jennifer Trone. 2000. Issue brief: Do drug courts save jail and prison beds? New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
72. Fox, Aubrey, and Robert V. Wolf. 2004. The future of drug courts: How states are mainstreaming the drug court model. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
73. Frederickson, David G., and H. George Frederickson 2006. Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
74. Friedson, Eliot. 2001. Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
75. Gargan, John J. 1981. Consideration of local government capacity. Public Administration Review 41(6):649-58.
76. Gebelein, Richard S. 2000. The rebirth of rehabilitation: Problems and perils of drug courts. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
77. Glaeser, Edward L., and Bruce Sacerdote. 1999. Why is there more crime in cities? Journal of Political Economy 107(6, part 2):S225-S258.
78. Glick, Henry R. 1981. Innovation in state judicial administration: Effects on court management and organization. American Politics Quarterly 9(1):49-69.
79. Goldkamp, John S. 1999. The origin of the drug treatment court in Miami. In The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation, Drugs, Health and Social Policy Series, Vol. 1, edited by W. Clinton Terry III, 19-42. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. -. 2003. The impact of drug courts. Criminology and Public Policy 2(2):197-206.
81. Goldsmith, Stephen, and William D. Eggers. 2004. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
82. Gore, Al. 1993. National performance review. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
83. Gray, Virginia. 1973. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review 67(4):1174-85.
84. Green, Judith, and Kevin Pranis. 2005. Alabama prison crisis: A Justice Strategies policy report commissioned by the Drug Policy Alliance. Washington, DC: Justice Strategies.
85. Guydish, Joseph, Ellen Wolfe, Barbara Tiajim, and William J. Woods. 2001. Drug court effectiveness: A review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 33(4):369-78.
86. Hall, Peter Dobkin. 1992. Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism and nonprofit organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
87. Hammack, David C. 1998. Making the nonprofit sector in the United States: A reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Harmon, Michael M., and Richard T. Mayer. 1986. Organization theory for public administration. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.
89. Harrell, Adele, John Roman, and Emily Sack. 2001. Drug court services for female offenders, 1996-1999: Evaluation of the Brooklyn treatment court. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
90. Hart, Peter, and Associates. 2002. Changing public attitudes toward the criminal justice system, February 2002. New York: Open Society Institute.
91. Hartney, Christopher, and Susan Marchionna. 2009. Attitudes of U. S. voters toward nonserious offenders and alternatives to incarceration. Oakland: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
92. Hatry, Harry P., Jake Cowan, and Michael Hendricks. 2004. Analyzing outcome information: Getting the most from data. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
93. Heck, Cary, and Aaron Roussell. 2007. State administration of drug courts: Exploring issues of authority, funding and legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review 18(4):418-33.
94. Hennessey, James J. 2001. Drug courts in operation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 33(4):1-10.
95. Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1996. A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the U. S. American Journal of Political Science 40(3):851-71.
96. -. 2003. Racial ethnic diversity and states' public policies: Social policies as context for welfare policies. In Race and the politics of welfare reform, edited by Sanford Schram, Joe Soss, and Richard Fording, 298-319. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
97. Hodgkinson, Virginia A., and Murray S. Weitzman. 1996. Nonprofit almanac 1996/1997. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
98. Hoefer, Richard. 2000. Accountability in action? Program evaluation in nonprofit human service agencies. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11(2):167-77.
99. Hoffman, Morris B. 2000. The drug court scandal. North Carolina Law Review 78:1437-1527.
100. -. 2002. The Denver drug court and its unintended consequences. In Drug courts in theory and in practice, edited by James L. Nolan Jr., 67-87. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
101. Honadle, Beth Walter. 1981. A capacity-building framework: A search for concept and purpose. Public Administration Review 41(5):575-80.
102. Hora, Peggy F., William G. Schma, and Jonathan Terrence A. Rosenthal. 1999. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review 74(2):439-537.
103. Huddleston, C. West, III, Karen Freeman-Wilson, and Donna L. Boone. 2004. Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
104. Huddleston, C. West, III, Douglas B. Marlowe, and Rachel Casebolt. 2008. Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
105. Hula, Richard, Cynthia Jackson-Elmore, and Laura Reese. 2007. Mixing God's work and the public business: A framework for the analysis of faith-based service delivery. Review of Policy Research 24(1):67-89.
106. IJC (Indiana Judicial Center). 2007a. Drug court certification checklist. Indianapolis: Indiana Judicial Center.
107. -. 2007b. Indiana Drug Courts: A summary of evaluation findings in five adult programs. Indianapolis: Indiana Judicial Center.
108. -. 2008. Application for initial certification as a drug court. Indianapolis: Indiana Judicial Center.
109. Judicial Conference of Indiana. 2008. Drug court rules. Indianapolis: Indiana Judicial Center.
110. Judicial Council of Georgia Standing Committee on Drug Courts. 2008a. FY2009 grant application and budget for start-up and operational programs. Atlanta: Judicial Council of Georgia Standing Committee on Drug Courts. Provided July 10, 2008, by e-mail to the author by Jane Martin, associate director, Division of Children, Families, and the Courts, Administrative Office of the Courts, Judicial Council of Georgia.
111. -. 2008b. Judicial Council of Georgia Standing Committee on Drug Courts Treatment Standards. Atlanta: Administrative Office of the Courts, Judicial Council of Georgia.
112. Karberg, Jennifer C., and Doris J. James. 2005. Substance dependence, abuse and treatment of jail inmates, 2002. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U. S. Department of Justice.
113. Kettl, Donald F. 1995. Building lasting reform: Enduring questions, missing answers. In Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform, edited by Donald F. Kettl and John J. Di Julio, 8-83. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
114. -. 2002. The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twentyfirst century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
115. -. 2005. The worst is yet to come: Lessons from September 11 and Hurricane Katrina. Fels Government Research Service Report 05-01. Philadelphia: Fels Institute of Government, University of Pennsylvania.
116. Kickert, Walter J. M., Eric-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koppenjan. 1999. Introduction: A management perspective on policy networks. In Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector, 2nd ed., edited by Walter J. M. Kickert, Erik-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koppenjan, 1-13. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
117. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analysis: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44(2):347-61.
118. King, Ryan S., and Marc Mauer. 2002. Distorted priorities: Drug offenders in state prisons. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project.
119. King, Ryan S., and Jill Pasquarella. 2009. Drug courts: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project.
120. Klinger, Donald E., and John Nalbandian. 2003. Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
121. Krisberg, Barry, and Susan Marchionna. 2006. Attitudes of U. S. voters toward prisoner rehabilitation and reentry policies. Oakland: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
122. Latimer, Jeff, Kelly Morton-Bourgon, and Jo-Anne Chrétien. 2006. A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: Do they reduce recidivism? Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, Government of Canada.
123. Leone, Matthew, Belinda Rodgers McCarthy, and Bernard McCarthy. 2007. Community-Based Corrections. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
124. Lester, James P., James L. Franke, Ann O'M. Bowman, and Kenneth Kramer. 1983. Hazardous wastes, politics and public policy: A comparative state analysis. Western Political Quarterly 36(2):257-85.
125. Letts, Christine, William P. Ryan, and Allen Grossman. 1999. High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
126. Light, Paul C. 1998. Sustaining innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
127. -. 2000. Making nonprofits work: A report on the tides of nonprofit management reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
128. -. 2004. Sustaining nonprofit performance: The case for capacity building and the evidence to support it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
129. Mandell, Myrna. 1994. Managing interdependencies through program structures: A revised paradigm. American Journal of Public Administration 24(1):99-121.
130. -. 1999. Community collaborations: Working through network structures. Policy Studies Review 16(1):42-64.
131. Marion, Nancy. 2002. Community corrections in Ohio: Cost savings and program effectiveness. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
132. Marlowe, Douglas B., David S. De Matteo, and David S. Festinger. 2003. A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter 16(1):113-28.
133. Marlowe, Douglas B., David S. Festinger, Patricia A. Lee, Karen L. Dugosh, and Kathleen M. Benasutti. 2006. Matching judicial supervision to clients' risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency 52(1):52-76.
134. Marlowe, Douglas B., Cary Heck, C. West Huddleston, III, and Rachel Casebolt. 2006. A national research agenda for drug courts: Plotting the course for second-generation scientific inquiry. Drug Court Review 5(2) (Special Research Edition):1-32.
135. Mauer, Mark. 1999. The race to incarcerate. New York: New Press and Sentencing Project.
136. McGuire, Michael. 2002. Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review 62(5):599-609.
137. Meier, Kenneth J. 1994. The politics of sin: Drugs, alcohol and public policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
138. Milward, H. Brinton, and Keith Provan. 1998a. Measuring network structure. Public Administration Review 76(2):387-407.
139. -. 1998b. Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2):203-21.
140. Mintrom, Michael. 2000. Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
141. Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari. 1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reform. Journal of Politics 60(1):126-48.
142. Missouri Association of Drug Court Professionals. 2008. MADCP board members. Jefferson City: Missouri Association of Drug Court Professionals.
143. Missouri Drug Courts Coordinating Commission. 2008. Drug court facts. Jefferson City: Drug Courts Coordinating Commission, Supreme Court of Missouri.
144. Missouri Office of the State Courts Administrator. 1998. Missouri resource manual for the development and implementation of drug courts. Jefferson City: Division of Court Programs and Research, Office of State Courts Administrator.
145. -. 2008. Summary of drug court site visit. Jefferson City: Division of Court Programs and Research, Office of State Courts Administrator.
146. Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly 54(1):103-24.
147. Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science 39(3):599-627.
148. Mossberger, Karen. 2000. The politics of ideas and the spread of the enterprise zones. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
149. Mossberger, Karen, and Kathleen Hale. 2002. Polydiffusion in intergovernmental programs: Information diffusion in school-to-work programs. American Review of Public Administration 32(4):398-422.
150. Mumola, Christopher J., and Jennifer C. Karberg. 2006. Drug use and dependence: State and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U. S. Department of Justice.
151. NACDL (National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers). 2009. America's problem-solving courts: The criminal costs of treatment and the case for reform. Washington, DC: NACDL.
152. NADCP (National Association of Drug Court Professionals). 1997. Defining drug courts: The key components. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
153. -. 2004. Defining drug courts: The key components. Published under Grant 96-DC-MX-K001, Drug Courts Program Office, Office of Justice Programs. Alexandria, VA: NADCP.
154. -. 2008. Position statement on the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act (NORA). Alexandria, VA: NADCP.
155. -. Various years. NADCP News. Alexandria, VA: NADCP.
156. National Center for State Courts. Various years. Annual report (1988-2005). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
157. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. 2009. The model court effect: Proven strategies in systems' change. Reno: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
158. National District Attorneys Association. 2005. Drug prosecution and prevention programs: A descriptive overview. Alexandria, VA: National District Attorneys Association.
159. Noble, Mary C., and Connie Reed. 1999. Kentucky drug courts: Court supervision of a drug treatment program. The Advocate 21(2):6.
160. Nolan, James L., Jr. 2001. Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
161. -. 2002. Drug courts in theory and in practice. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
162. NORA Campaign. 2008. Response to the NADCP position paper on NORA (Prop. 5). Los Angeles and Sacramento: Campaign for New Drug Policies and Drug Policy Alliance Network.
163. Office of Justice Programs. 2000. Summary of drug court activity by state and county. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
164. -. 2001a. Background information on state court administrative office activities in support of local drug court programs, May 2001. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
165. -. 2001b. Court rules enacted for state and local courts relating to drug courts, May 2001. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
166. -. 2003. State level activity relating to drug court programs as of December 15, 2003. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
167. -. 2004a. Statutes enacted in state legislatures and tribal councils relating to drug courts as of May 1, 2004. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
168. -. 2004b. Summary of drug court activity by state and county. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
169. -. 2004c. Summary of drug court activity by state and county. Personal communication between the author and Caroline Cooper and electronic transmission of data files by Elizabeth Janovski from the Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, July 22.
170. -. 2006. Frequently asked questions series: State-level approaches and experiences in developing MIS systems for local drug court programs. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project at American University, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice.
171. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
172. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1988. Strategies for intergovernmental management: Implementing programs in intergovernmental management. International Journal of Public Administration 11(4):417-41.
173. -. 1997. Implications for democracy in a networked bureaucratic world. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7(3):443-59.
174. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2004. Desperately seeking Selznick: Co-optation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Administration Review 64(6):681-93.
175. Ott, J. Steven. 2001. Perspectives on organizational governance: Some effects on government-nonprofit relations. In The nature of the nonprofit sector, edited by J. Steven Ott, 288-96. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
176. Page, Stephen. 2004. Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review 64(5):591-606.
177. Peters, Jeremy W. 2009. Albany reaches deal to repeal '70s drug laws. New York Times, March 26.
178. Peters, Roger H., and Mary R. Murrin. 2000. Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior 27(1):72-96.
179. Pew Center on the States. 2008. One in 100: Behind bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
180. -. 2009. One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
181. Philadelphia, City of. 2006. Resolution No. 060348 proclaiming the month of May, 2006 as "National Drug Treatment Court Month" in the City of Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Council of the City of Philadelphia.
182. Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
183. Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1):1-33.
184. -. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61(4):414-23.
185. Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
186. Radin, Beryl. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
187. -. 2006. Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
188. Rainey, Hal G. 2003. Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
189. Rainey, Hal G., and Paula Steinbauer. 1999. Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(1):1-32.
190. Reilly, Dennis A., and Atoundra Pierre-Lawson. 2008. Ensuring sustainability for drug courts: An overview of funding strategies. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute of National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
191. Rhodes, Ronald A. W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44(3):652-67.
192. -. 1997. Foreword to Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector, 2nd ed., edited by Walter J. M. Kickert, Erik-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koopenjan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
193. Riccio, James, Howard S. Bloom, and Carolyn J. Hill. 2000. Management, organizational characteristics and performance: The case of welfare-to-work programs. In Governance and performance: New perspectives, edited by Carolyn Heinrich and Laurence E. Lynn Jr., 166-98. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
194. Rittel, Horst W. J., and Melvin Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2):155-69.
195. Roderick, Melissa, Brian A. Jacob, and Anthony S. Bryk. 2000. Evaluating Chicago's efforts to end social promotion. In Governance and performance: New perspectives, edited by Carolyn Heinrich and Laurence E. Lynn Jr., 34-67. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
196. Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of innovation, 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
197. Roman, John, Wendy Townsend, and Avinash Singh Bhati. 2003. National estimates of drug court recidivism. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U. S. Department of Justice.
198. Rosenthal, John Terrence A. 2002. Therapeutic jurisprudence and drug treatment courts. In Drug courts in theory and in practice, edited by James L. Nolan Jr., 145-71. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
199. Rottman, David B., and William E. Hewitt. 1996. Trial court structure and performance. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
200. Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
201. Salamon, Lester M. 1995. Partners in public service: Governmental relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
202. -. 2002. The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. In The state of nonprofit America, edited by Lester M. Salamon, 3-61. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
203. Sampson, Robert J., and John H. Laub. 2005. Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
204. Savage, Robert L. 1985. Diffusion research traditions and the spread of policy innovations in a federal system. Publius, The Journal of Federalism 15(4):1-27.
205. Schutt, Russell K. 1999. Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
206. Shaffer, Deborah K., Shelley J. Listwan, Edward J. Latessa, and Christopher T. Lowenkamp. 2008. Examining the differential impact of drug court services by court type: Findings from Ohio. Drug Court Review 6(1):33-66.
207. Sherman, Lawrence W. 2002. Fair and effective policing. In Crime: Public policies for crime control, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia, 383-412. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
208. Simon, Herbert A. 1986. Theories of bounded rationality. In Decision and organization, 2nd ed., edited by C. B. McGuire and Roy Radner, 161-76. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
209. Smith, David Horton. 1973. The impact of the volunteer sector on society. In The nature of the nonprofit sector, edited by J. Steven Ott, 79-87. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
210. Smith, Stephen Rathgeb. 2006. Government financing of nonprofit activity. In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 219-56. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
211. Smith, Stephen Rathgeb, and Michael Lipsky. 1995. Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
212. Sosin, Michael R., Stephen Rathgeb Smith, Timothy Hilton, and Lucy P. Jordan. 2009. Temporary crisis and priority changes: The case of state substance abuse systems. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, advance access published online August 27, Doi 10.1093/jopart/mup022.
213. Squire, Peverill. 1992. Legislative professionalism and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(1):69-79.
214. Stake, Robert E. 1995. The logic of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
215. Steen, Sara. 2002. West coast drug courts: Getting offenders morally involved in the criminal justice process. In Drug courts in theory and in practice, edited by James L. Nolan Jr., 50-66. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
216. Steuerle, C. Eugene, and Virginia A. Hodgkinson. 2006. Meeting social needs: Comparing independent sector and government resources. In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 81-106. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
217. Stimson, James. 1985. Regression in space and time: A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science 29(4):914-47.
218. Stone, Deborah. 1997. The policy paradox: The art of political decision making, 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
219. Sullivan, John. L. 1973. Political correlates of social, economic and religious diversity in the American states. Journal of Politics 35(1):70-84.
220. Supreme Court of Florida. 2006. Administrative Order No. AOSC06-51. Tallahassee: Supreme Court of Florida.
221. Supreme Court Task Force on Treatment-Based Drug Courts 2004a. Critical performance indicators and data elements for adult drug courts in Florida. Tallahassee: Office of the State Courts Administrator, State Courts System of Florida.
222. -. 2004b. Critical performance indicators and data elements for juvenile drug courts in Florida. Tallahassee: Office of the State Courts Administrator, State Courts System of Florida.
223. -. 2004c. Critical performance indicators and data elements for dependency drug courts in Florida. Tallahassee: Office of the State Courts Administrator, State Courts System of Florida.
224. -. 2004d. Report on Florida's Drug Courts. Tallahassee: Office of the State Courts Administrator, State Courts System of Florida.
225. Tauber, Jeffery. 1998. The future of drug court: Comprehensive drug court systems. National Drug Court Institute Review 1(1):86-101.
226. Tennessee Office of Criminal Justice Programs. 2004. Tennessee Mentor Drug Court Program. Nashville: Office of Criminal Justice Programs, Department of Finance and Administration.
227. -. 2005. 2004/2005 Tennessee drug court annual report. Nashville: Office of Criminal Justice Programs, Department of Finance and Administration.
228. -. 2007. 2006/2007 Tennessee drug court annual report. Nashville: Office of Criminal Justice Programs, Department of Finance and Administration.
229. -. 2008. The Tennessee Office of Criminal Justice Programs Announces a Drug Court Certification Program. Nashville: Office of Criminal Justice Programs, Department of Finance and Administration.
230. Terry, W. Clinton, III. 1999. Broward County's dedicated drug treatment court: From postadjudication to diversion. In The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation, edited by W. Clinton Terry III, 77-107. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
231. Tittle, Charles R., and David A. Ward. 1993. The interaction of age with the correlates and causes of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9(1):3-45.
232. Tolbert, Caroline J., Karen Mossberger, and Ramona McNeal. 2008. Institutions, policy innovation and e-government in the American states. Public Administration Review 68(3):549-63.
233. Tonry, Michael. 1998. Intermediate sanctions in sentencing guidelines. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 23:199-253.
234. Townsend, Wendy A. 2004. Systems changes associated with criminal justice treatment networks. Public Administration Review 64(5):607-17.
235. Turner, Susan, and Joan Petersilia. 1996. Work release in Washington: Effects on recidivism and correctional costs. Prison Journal 76(2):138-64.
236. University of Alabama. 2008. MIDAS: Alabama's DUI tracking system. Tuscaloosa: CARE Research and Development Laboratory, University of Alabama. Available at http://care.cs.ua.edu/projects-midas.aspx.
237. University of Missouri at Columbia School of Social Work. 2001. Composite Report on the Ten Key Components in Selected Missouri Drug Court Programs, February 2001. Columbia: School of Social Work, University of Missouri at Columbia. Available at www.courts.mo.gov/.
238. U. S. Bureau of the Census. Various years. Statistical Abstract of the United States (1988-2005). Available at www.census.gov.
239. U. S. General Accounting Office. 1997. Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Report to the Committee on the Judiciary, U. S. Senate, and the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives. July 1997. GAO/GCD-97-106. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
240. -. 2002. Drug Courts: Better DOJ data collection and evaluation efforts needed to measure impact of drug court programs-Report to congressional requesters, April. GAO-02-434. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
241. U. S. Government Accountability Office. 2005. Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes-Report to the Congressional Committees, February. GAO-05-218. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
242. U. S. Sentencing Commission. 2007. Analysis of the impact of the Crack Cocaine Amendment if made retroactive, October 3, 2007. Washington, DC: U. S. Sentencing Commission.
243. -. 2008a. U. S. Sentencing Commission preliminary crack cocaine retroactivity data report. Washington, DC: U. S. Sentencing Commission.
244. -. 2008b. U. S. Sentencing Commission 2008 annual report. Washington, DC: U. S. Sentencing Commission.
245. Van Til, Jon. 2000. Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
246. Votey, Harold L., Jr., and Llad Philips. 2003. Crime, youth and the labor market: Are we any closer to answers? In Crime control and social justice: The delicate balance, edited by Darnell F. Hawkins, Samuel L. Myers Jr., and Randolph N. Stone, 67-92. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
247. Walker, Jack L. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63(3):880-99.
248. Weiss, Carol H. 1983. Ideology interests and information: The basis of policy positions. In Ethics, the social sciences and policy analysis, edited by Daniel Callahan and Bruce Jennings, 213-45. New York: Plenum Press.
249. Weiss, Janet. A. 2002. Public information. In The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, edited by Lester M. Salamon, 217-54. New York: Oxford University Press.
250. Welsh, Brandon C., and David P. Farrington. 2000. Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs. In Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 27, edited by Michael Tonry, 1-79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
251. Wexler, David B. 2004. Therapeutic jurisprudence: It's not just for problem-solving courts and calendars anymore-Trends. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
252. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1972. The self-evaluating organization. Public Administration Review 32(5):509-20.
253. Wilson, James Q. 1983. Thinking about crime, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
254. -. 1990. Drugs and crime. In Drugs and crime, Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 26, edited by Michael Tonry and James Q. Wilson, 521-43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
255. -. 2002. Crime and public policy. In Crime: Public policies for crime control, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia, 253-90. Oakland: ICS Press.
256. Wool, Jon, and Don Stemen. 2004. Changing fortunes or changing attitudes? Sentencing and corrections reform in 2003. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
257. Wright, Deil S. 1988. Understanding intergovernmental relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
258. Yin, Robert K. 2002. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
259. Yin, Robert K., and Gregory D. Andranovich. 1986. Increasing states' use of federal statistics about mental health organizations. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corporation.
260. -. 1987. Getting research used in the natural hazards field: The role of professional associations. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corporation.
261. Young, Dennis R. 2006. Complementary, supplementary or adversarial? Nonprofit-government relations. In Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 37-80. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.