Taking Ontology Seriously in Political Science and Political Theory: A Reply to Mayhew

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 743-744

  White, Stephen K ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894926089     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: 15375935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096500061941     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Ball, Terence. 1987. “Is There Progress in Political Science?” In Idioms of Inquiry: Critique and Renewal in Political Science, ed. Terence Ball. New York: State University of New York Press.
2. Campbell, David. Forthcoming. “International Engagements: The Politics of North American International Relations Theory.” Political Theory.
3. Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics. Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Fay, Brian, and J. Donald Moon. 1977. “What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7(3): 209–227.
5. Moon M., J. Donald. 1975. “The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives.” In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Taylor, Charles. 1995. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. White, Stephen K. 2000. Sustaining Affirmation: The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Contemporary Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.